Kazanma Oranına Göre En İyi TFT Takım Kompozisyonları

Bu tablo, en yüksek kazanma oranlarına sahip TFT takım kompozisyonlarını göstererek dereceli yükseliş için en başarılı komboları belirlemenize yardımcı olur. En iyi double-up şampiyonlu Set 17 kompozisyonları: Atılgan (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg), Sinsi (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), N.O.V.A. (97.8% WR, 1.8 avg). Atılgan/N.O.V.A. 99.26% kazanma oranı ve 1.71 ortalama sıralama ile lider. Sinsi 97.86% kazanma oranı ile takip ediyor. Gerçek zamanlı performans istatistikleriyle 100 double-up şampiyonlu kompozisyon analiz ediliyor.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 106.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 79.3% and average placement of 3.05 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Atılgan/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Sinsi/Micingil at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Ulvi Düellocu at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Atılgan/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Master Yi
  • Sinsi/Micingil (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bard
  • N.O.V.A./Ulvi Düellocu (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Parti Patisi/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Parti Patisi/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Atılgan/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Sinsi/Micingil: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Ulvi Düellocu: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikacı/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Parti Patisi/Sonsuz Karanlık follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Doğruluğu korumamıza yardım edin! Yanlış istatistikler, eksik veriler veya herhangi bir sorun fark ederseniz, geri bildiriminiz tüm topluluk için veri kalitemizi doğrudan iyileştirir.

Sorun Bildir

TFT Takım Kompları - Set 17 SSS

TFT Set 17'da en iyi TFT dizilimi nedir?

TFT Set 17'da en iyi TFT dizilimi Atılgan/N.O.V.A., Master Yi ana taşıyıcı olarak, %99.3 kazanma oranı ve 1.71 ortalama sıralama ile. Bu dizilim sıralama tırmanması için etkilidir ve sürekli olarak ilk 4'e girer.

Atılgan/N.O.V.A. dizilimi nasıl oynanır?

Atılgan/N.O.V.A. oynamak için Master Yi'ı ana taşıyıcınız olarak inşa etmeye odaklanın. Erken dönemde Master Yi ve destek birimlerini arayın, taşıyıcınızla sinerji yapan eşyaları önceliklendirin ve 7-8. seviyede güç zirvesine ulaşmayı hedefleyin. Bu dizilimin seçim oranı %0.1, nispeten yarışılmayan bir seçenek yapıyor.

TFT Set 17'da tırmanmak için hangi dizilimler iyi?

TFT Set 17'da istikrarlı LP kazanımı için Parti Patisi/N.O.V.A. 1.62 ile en iyi ortalama sıralamayı sunar. Diğer güvenilir seçenekler Sinsi/Micingil (ort. 1.66) ve Atılgan/N.O.V.A. (ort. 1.71). İstikrarlı dizilimler alt 4 bitişleri minimize eder ve sabit tırmanma sağlar.

En kolay TFT dizilimi nedir?

Atılgan/N.O.V.A. daha kolay tırmanma arayan oyuncular için harika bir seçenek. %99.3 kazanma oranı ama sadece %0.1 seçim oranıyla yarışılma ihtimaliniz düşük, oyunu daha kolay gezinebilir kılıyor. Düşük yarışma, pivotları zorlamadan birimlerinizi doğal olarak bulabileceğiniz anlamına gelir.

TFT Set 17'da dizilimi zorlamak vs esnek olmak ne zaman gerekir?

TFT Set 17'da Replikacı/N.O.V.A.'ın seçim oranı %1.9, yani yoğun yarışılıyor. Başkalarının gittiğini görürseniz, Atılgan/N.O.V.A. gibi alternatiflere pivot etmeyi düşünün. Erken birimleri ve eşyaları bulduğunuzda veya yarışılmadığında zorlayın. 2+ oyuncu aynı birimler için yarıştığında esnek olun.

TFT Set 17'da en yüksek kazanma oranlarına sahip dizilimler hangileri?

Kazanma oranı en yüksek 3 dizilim: 1) Atılgan/N.O.V.A. (%99.3), 2) Sinsi/Micingil (97.9%) ve 3) N.O.V.A./Ulvi Düellocu (97.8%). Bunlar dereceli maçlarda LP'yi maksimize etmek için en güçlü dizilimlerdir.

TFT dizilimleri için kazanma oranı neden önemli?

Kazanma oranı bir dizilimin ne sıklıkla ilk 4'e girdiğini gösterir, bu da derecelide LP kazandırır. Atılgan/N.O.V.A. (%99.3) gibi yüksek kazanma oranlı dizilimler birçok oyunda istikrarlı şekilde iyi performans gösterir. Ancak seçim oranını da düşünün—birden fazla oyuncu zorlarsa yoğun yarışılan dizilimler oyunlarınızda düşük performans gösterebilir.