时间刺客对阵 狂暴之心
时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心在LoL版本26.9中是a decisive对线。时间刺客以57.1%胜率(+14.3%)击败狂暴之心，基于7场比赛。时间刺客 wins the early laning phase while 狂暴之心 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心对线的最佳时间刺客出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
时间刺客 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 时间刺客 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
狂暴之心(57.1%)Who Wins the 时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心 Matchup?
时间刺客对战狂暴之心对决摘要
时间刺客对战狂暴之心在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据7场近期比赛的分析，时间刺客以57.1%的胜率获胜，相比狂暴之心的42.9%，给予时间刺客 14.3个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：时间刺客控制早期对线阶段，但狂暴之心在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——时间刺客需要在狂暴之心达到强势期之前压制优势，而狂暴之心应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在续航方面，时间刺客领先513 HP/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 时间刺客玩家可以自信地选择对抗狂暴之心并从1级开始激进地游戏。尽早通过有利的换血建立线上统治权，并尽可能将狂暴之心从补刀中挤走。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
时间刺客对战狂暴之心对线阶段分析
时间刺客在对线阶段对阵狂暴之心时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。时间刺客在补刀, 伤害, 金币收入 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 时间刺客 Build Against 狂暴之心
法师之靴是对抗狂暴之心的最佳鞋子选择，提供时间刺客在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 时间刺客对抗狂暴之心表现最好的核心装备是影焰, 中娅沙漏 和 灭世者的死亡之帽。这一组合给时间刺客提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装在2场比赛中达到稳固的50.0%胜率，证明它是面对狂暴之心时可靠的装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为时间刺客对战狂暴之心对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
时间刺客100.0%狂暴之心0.0%时间刺客40.0%狂暴之心60.0%时间刺客以令人印象深刻的100.0%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先狂暴之心 100.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着时间刺客可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
狂暴之心在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有60.0%胜率——比时间刺客高20.0点。长时间游戏强烈有利于狂暴之心，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
这场对决有戏剧性的力量转变：时间刺客必须积极压制早期优势并在狂暴之心达到成长节点之前结束游戏。如果狂暴之心在不太落后的情况下度过对线阶段，对决将倾向于他们。龙和峡谷先锋控制至关重要——确保早期目标的队伍可以滚雪球或争取时间成长。
Best 时间刺客 Runes Against 狂暴之心
坚决
巫术
使用坚决主系配巫术副系允许时间刺客压制对狂暴之心的优势，放大使这场对决有利的优势。
英雄联盟26.9版本时间刺客对线数据。下表显示时间刺客对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括时间刺客最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.50% | 88 | 6.5 | 864 | 12,211 | 68.8% | 58.9% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 6.3 | 728 | 11,490 | 41.5% | 54.4% | |
| 44.30% | 79 | 4.5 | 812 | 12,046 | 33.3% | 51.0% | |
| 43.59% | 78 | 6.4 | 794 | 11,455 | 40.0% | 47.4% | |
| 40.26% | 77 | 3.9 | 750 | 12,022 | 40.0% | 40.5% | |
| 46.67% | 75 | 5.5 | 783 | 11,865 | 54.3% | 40.0% | |
| 43.84% | 73 | 1.4 | 698 | 12,973 | 40.0% | 47.4% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 6.4 | 933 | 12,348 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 50.75% | 67 | 1.3 | 755 | 13,726 | 42.3% | 56.1% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 1.1 | 664 | 12,766 | 59.4% | 42.4% | |
| 58.06% | 62 | 1.2 | 767 | 13,806 | 52.2% | 61.5% | |
| 60.00% | 60 | 1.3 | 787 | 13,536 | 63.6% | 57.9% | |
| 57.89% | 57 | 2.1 | 823 | 12,814 | 64.3% | 51.7% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 6.4 | 845 | 12,244 | 59.3% | 46.4% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 1.2 | 622 | 12,163 | 48.0% | 53.6% | |
| 39.22% | 51 | 6.4 | 815 | 11,419 | 40.7% | 37.5% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 5.4 | 880 | 12,724 | 54.5% | 34.5% | |
| 52.94% | 51 | 3.9 | 773 | 13,033 | 50.0% | 55.2% | |
| 60.00% | 50 | 6.4 | 886 | 13,070 | 58.8% | 60.6% | |
| 50.00% | 50 | 1.4 | 750 | 13,660 | 47.6% | 51.7% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.3 | 684 | 12,436 | 54.2% | 40.0% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 2.9 | 742 | 13,099 | 50.0% | 53.1% | |
| 40.43% | 47 | 1.1 | 654 | 12,936 | 35.3% | 43.3% | |
| 40.43% | 47 | 5.9 | 821 | 11,350 | 54.5% | 28.0% | |
| 36.36% | 44 | 1.4 | 691 | 12,897 | 26.3% | 44.0% | |
| 68.18% | 44 | 1.4 | 738 | 13,195 | 68.4% | 68.0% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 5.4 | 732 | 12,022 | 21.4% | 56.0% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 1.1 | 689 | 12,382 | 38.9% | 61.9% | |
| 63.16% | 38 | 6.7 | 911 | 13,078 | 61.1% | 65.0% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 6.2 | 691 | 10,830 | 56.3% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.7 | 776 | 12,356 | 53.9% | 47.8% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 6.1 | 814 | 12,421 | 69.2% | 59.1% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.1 | 772 | 13,487 | 57.1% | 35.0% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 6.2 | 775 | 11,240 | 63.2% | 53.9% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 6.5 | 725 | 12,274 | 30.8% | 38.9% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 5.0 | 812 | 12,514 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 1.1 | 666 | 13,954 | 66.7% | 32.0% | |
| 70.00% | 30 | 6.2 | 930 | 12,434 | 83.3% | 61.1% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 2.0 | 796 | 12,955 | 23.1% | 64.7% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 6.0 | 863 | 12,224 | 46.1% | 35.3% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 6.5 | 842 | 12,408 | 50.0% | 68.8% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.3 | 712 | 12,273 | 45.5% | 47.1% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 6.1 | 918 | 11,477 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 67.86% | 28 | 1.7 | 727 | 13,974 | 66.7% | 68.8% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 5.2 | 871 | 13,032 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 5.3 | 806 | 11,273 | 70.6% | 44.4% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.4 | 892 | 12,804 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.0 | 615 | 11,943 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.1 | 725 | 11,069 | 58.3% | 38.5% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 6.8 | 944 | 12,140 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 1.5 | 840 | 14,211 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.5 | 834 | 12,862 | 40.0% | 57.1% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.2 | 735 | 13,239 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 6.4 | 758 | 11,440 | 38.5% | 40.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 1.0 | 596 | 11,830 | 45.5% | 58.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.1 | 703 | 13,248 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 1.1 | 748 | 13,817 | 55.6% | 61.5% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.5 | 685 | 9,472 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.9 | 626 | 10,389 | 45.5% | 55.6% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 5.9 | 790 | 11,656 | 55.6% | 81.8% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 1,055 | 13,175 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 3.1 | 782 | 9,950 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 3.5 | 771 | 12,961 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 0.8 | 575 | 12,503 | 20.0% | 46.1% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 0.9 | 715 | 12,434 | 33.3% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.8 | 597 | 11,890 | 75.0% | 30.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 879 | 13,760 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.4 | 603 | 9,094 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 4.8 | 626 | 11,771 | 57.1% | 55.6% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.9 | 947 | 11,742 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.6 | 600 | 11,911 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 0.9 | 668 | 10,658 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.3 | 812 | 12,591 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.0 | 826 | 10,036 | 83.3% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.4 | 626 | 12,374 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 1.4 | 792 | 13,620 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.8 | 775 | 15,472 | 66.7% | 30.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.4 | 831 | 13,370 | 83.3% | 83.3% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 3.4 | 740 | 12,470 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.2 | 698 | 12,271 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 3.2 | 681 | 13,138 | 20.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.4 | 852 | 13,377 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.5 | 950 | 12,406 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.5 | 857 | 11,909 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.0 | 845 | 9,932 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 907 | 12,051 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.2 | 1,002 | 13,472 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 4.1 | 981 | 12,436 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.5 | 792 | 11,905 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.0 | 650 | 12,685 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.8 | 825 | 12,401 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.6 | 628 | 10,222 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.2 | 595 | 12,374 | 16.7% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.0 | 720 | 14,034 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 3.3 | 956 | 15,020 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 3.5 | 866 | 13,627 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 669 | 11,675 | 20.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 924 | 12,481 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 738 | 12,428 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.7 | 836 | 14,487 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.2 | 629 | 11,143 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 1,006 | 12,380 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.2 | 654 | 13,879 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 900 | 13,722 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 684 | 11,490 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 820 | 14,214 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 640 | 11,574 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 819 | 11,060 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 879 | 13,189 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 704 | 12,318 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，时间刺客对狂暴之心表现如何？
时间刺客以57.1%的胜率赢得时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心的对决，而狂暴之心为42.9%，相差14.3个百分点。该数据基于26.9版本的7场近期排位赛。
在前期，时间刺客对狂暴之心表现如何？
在前期，时间刺客对狂暴之心占有优势，胜率为100.0%对0.0%。时间刺客玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，时间刺客对狂暴之心表现如何？
在后期，狂暴之心以60.0%对40.0%的胜率主导时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心的对决。狂暴之心在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心的对决？
时间刺客在英雄联盟26.9版本中以57.1%的胜率赢得对狂暴之心的对决。14.3个百分点的优势意味着根据7场分析的比赛，时间刺客在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗狂暴之心的最佳时间刺客出装是什么？
对抗狂暴之心的最佳时间刺客出装包括影焰, 中娅沙漏, 灭世者的死亡之帽 with 法师之靴。This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗狂暴之心的最佳时间刺客符文是什么？
对抗狂暴之心的最佳时间刺客符文使用坚决主系和巫术副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 时间刺客 vs 狂暴之心 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
时间刺客克制狂暴之心吗？
是的，时间刺客对狂暴之心有利，胜率为57.1%。根据当前26.9版本数据，时间刺客在线上strongly counters狂暴之心。
如何用时间刺客对战狂暴之心？
当时间刺客对战狂暴之心时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。