异画师对阵 时间刺客
异画师 vs 时间刺客在LoL版本26.11中是a decisive对线。时间刺客以56.0%胜率(+12.0%)击败异画师，基于50场比赛。时间刺客 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到异画师 vs 时间刺客对线的最佳异画师出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
异画师对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看异画师对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
异画师 vs 时间刺客对线谁赢？
异画师对战时间刺客对决摘要
异画师对战时间刺客在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据50场近期比赛的分析，时间刺客以56.0%的胜率获胜，相比异画师的44.0%，给予时间刺客 12.0个百分点的优势。 时间刺客在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使异画师玩家难以找到有利窗口，因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在续航方面，时间刺客领先696 HP/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 时间刺客在这场对决中有强大优势。异画师玩家应该防守性地游戏，优先在塔下安全发育，并寻找由打野压力或时间刺客过度前压创造的机会。避免长时间换血，等待团战，那里的位置和协调更重要。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
异画师对战时间刺客对线阶段分析
异画师在对线阶段对阵时间刺客时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。异画师在补刀, 伤害 和 控制技能方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 异画师 Build Against 时间刺客
灵能使之靴是对抗时间刺客的最佳鞋子选择，提供异画师在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 异画师对抗时间刺客表现最好的核心装备是兰德里的折磨, 影焰 和 虚空之杖。这一组合给异画师提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为异画师对战时间刺客对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
异画师44.0%
时间刺客56.0%异画师44.0%时间刺客56.0%时间刺客以令人印象深刻的56.0%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先异画师 12.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着时间刺客可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
时间刺客在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有56.0%胜率——比异画师高12.0点。长时间游戏强烈有利于时间刺客，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
时间刺客在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势，使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。异画师玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人，而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 异画师 Runes Against 时间刺客
巫术
精密
巫术和精密符文设置给异画师在这场困难对决中与时间刺客竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.11版本异画师对线数据。下表显示异画师对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括异画师最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.47% | 158 | 6.6 | 928 | 11,277 | 48.5% | 46.7% | |
| 56.90% | 116 | 6.6 | 1,016 | 12,036 | 56.3% | 57.4% | |
| 45.71% | 105 | 6.4 | 965 | 11,894 | 56.1% | 39.1% | |
| 54.90% | 102 | 5.4 | 816 | 11,196 | 57.1% | 52.8% | |
| 43.00% | 100 | 6.0 | 839 | 11,002 | 42.9% | 43.1% | |
| 57.14% | 98 | 6.5 | 1,069 | 12,830 | 55.9% | 57.8% | |
| 42.86% | 91 | 6.2 | 872 | 11,591 | 40.0% | 45.1% | |
| 54.44% | 90 | 6.7 | 1,001 | 12,240 | 54.3% | 54.5% | |
| 47.67% | 86 | 6.5 | 1,033 | 12,399 | 37.5% | 53.7% | |
| 46.91% | 81 | 6.4 | 984 | 11,587 | 43.6% | 50.0% | |
| 40.28% | 72 | 6.3 | 892 | 11,652 | 45.2% | 36.6% | |
| 42.42% | 66 | 6.6 | 981 | 13,500 | 73.7% | 29.8% | |
| 32.81% | 64 | 6.3 | 824 | 10,449 | 31.0% | 34.3% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 6.4 | 972 | 11,273 | 47.8% | 51.2% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 6.1 | 812 | 11,147 | 59.1% | 50.0% | |
| 51.72% | 58 | 6.3 | 1,127 | 10,982 | 53.6% | 50.0% | |
| 45.61% | 57 | 6.3 | 1,022 | 10,809 | 41.9% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 55 | 6.3 | 990 | 12,041 | 66.7% | 55.9% | |
| 40.74% | 54 | 6.3 | 868 | 11,129 | 40.0% | 41.4% | |
| 48.15% | 54 | 6.5 | 975 | 12,324 | 57.1% | 42.4% | |
| 43.40% | 53 | 5.1 | 865 | 10,520 | 39.1% | 46.7% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.7 | 958 | 10,901 | 44.0% | 44.0% | |
| 39.58% | 48 | 6.5 | 1,098 | 11,923 | 46.1% | 37.1% | |
| 58.70% | 46 | 6.9 | 1,054 | 12,070 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 33.33% | 45 | 6.2 | 931 | 10,980 | 27.8% | 37.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.6 | 921 | 13,310 | 60.0% | 48.0% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 6.4 | 977 | 12,479 | 41.2% | 53.9% | |
| 37.21% | 43 | 6.5 | 944 | 13,095 | 19.1% | 54.5% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 6.6 | 857 | 10,653 | 57.9% | 31.8% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 6.4 | 954 | 11,527 | 53.3% | 46.1% | |
| 35.00% | 40 | 5.8 | 932 | 10,466 | 22.2% | 45.5% | |
| 60.00% | 40 | 6.6 | 1,020 | 11,188 | 57.9% | 61.9% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 6.7 | 1,016 | 11,935 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 6.6 | 878 | 10,830 | 47.4% | 38.9% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 7.0 | 1,074 | 13,446 | 53.3% | 63.6% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 2.9 | 829 | 10,095 | 69.2% | 47.8% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.6 | 1,009 | 11,188 | 57.1% | 47.6% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 6.6 | 1,159 | 11,874 | 31.6% | 60.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.5 | 1,096 | 13,178 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 4.1 | 911 | 11,134 | 40.0% | 65.2% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 4.6 | 910 | 11,702 | 85.7% | 34.6% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 6.7 | 1,006 | 11,542 | 70.6% | 60.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.3 | 936 | 12,112 | 62.5% | 47.8% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 6.8 | 953 | 11,886 | 46.7% | 60.0% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.3 | 899 | 10,728 | 38.5% | 70.6% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.9 | 903 | 10,829 | 38.5% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 3.6 | 808 | 10,657 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.3 | 915 | 12,415 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 7.2 | 1,163 | 12,467 | 70.0% | 42.9% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.4 | 921 | 12,438 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 7.2 | 890 | 12,291 | 61.5% | 44.4% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 2.0 | 842 | 9,650 | 78.6% | 25.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.8 | 726 | 9,379 | 36.4% | 45.5% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 2.4 | 922 | 10,833 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 4.5 | 1,053 | 11,577 | 50.0% | 35.7% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 6.5 | 928 | 11,439 | 57.1% | 85.7% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.5 | 934 | 12,569 | 55.6% | 36.4% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 7.3 | 1,023 | 12,579 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 6.5 | 829 | 11,211 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.8 | 917 | 11,040 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.1 | 870 | 11,952 | 25.0% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.8 | 1,068 | 12,374 | 60.0% | 27.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.7 | 797 | 11,178 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 2.6 | 863 | 10,979 | 40.0% | 30.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.0 | 1,001 | 10,739 | 62.5% | 57.1% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 6.9 | 995 | 12,445 | 62.5% | 42.9% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.2 | 921 | 11,314 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 2.2 | 728 | 9,682 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 7.4 | 1,078 | 14,789 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.4 | 963 | 14,676 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.7 | 791 | 9,880 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 7.1 | 1,096 | 13,142 | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.8 | 774 | 9,372 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 6.4 | 1,185 | 13,278 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.8 | 927 | 11,100 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.0 | 943 | 12,303 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.8 | 856 | 13,224 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.6 | 1,005 | 13,529 | 75.0% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 1,119 | 9,994 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 1,003 | 12,874 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 7.5 | 1,062 | 13,173 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.2 | 872 | 10,539 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 2.6 | 679 | 10,854 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.2 | 923 | 14,340 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.8 | 769 | 8,646 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 1,115 | 13,556 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 576 | 7,869 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.2 | 915 | 11,326 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.6 | 930 | 9,182 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.2 | 1,048 | 10,557 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 8.1 | 975 | 14,006 | 80.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.5 | 636 | 7,993 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 936 | 9,583 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.9 | 826 | 7,816 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.9 | 871 | 11,393 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.4 | 1,063 | 13,645 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.6 | 824 | 10,471 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.3 | 835 | 10,621 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.3 | 1,077 | 12,914 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.7 | 1,018 | 13,335 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.7 | 969 | 9,767 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 5.3 | 873 | 9,981 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.0 | 1,133 | 13,546 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 720 | 9,159 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.2 | 717 | 8,787 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.3 | 662 | 11,767 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.5 | 964 | 14,148 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.0 | 1,155 | 14,903 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.7 | 1,013 | 8,468 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 3.3 | 795 | 10,290 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.1 | 1,011 | 11,687 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 1,331 | 13,578 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 883 | 11,860 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 907 | 10,653 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 858 | 12,456 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 646 | 9,754 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 890 | 10,508 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
异画师 vs 时间刺客 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，异画师对时间刺客表现如何？
时间刺客以56.0%的胜率赢得异画师 vs 时间刺客的对决，而异画师为44.0%，相差12.0个百分点。该数据基于26.11版本的50场近期排位赛。
在前期，异画师对时间刺客表现如何？
在前期，时间刺客对异画师占有优势，胜率为56.0%对44.0%。时间刺客玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，异画师对时间刺客表现如何？
在后期，时间刺客以56.0%对44.0%的胜率主导异画师 vs 时间刺客的对决。时间刺客在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得异画师 vs 时间刺客的对决？
时间刺客在英雄联盟26.11版本中以56.0%的胜率赢得对异画师的对决。12.0个百分点的优势意味着根据50场分析的比赛，时间刺客在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗时间刺客的最佳异画师出装是什么？
对抗时间刺客的最佳异画师出装包括兰德里的折磨, 影焰, 虚空之杖 with 灵能使之靴。 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗时间刺客的最佳异画师符文是什么？
对抗时间刺客的最佳异画师符文使用巫术主系和精密副系。This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the 异画师 vs 时间刺客 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
异画师克制时间刺客吗？
不，异画师对抗时间刺客时表现吃力，胜率仅为44.0%。时间刺客在这个对决中占优。异画师玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少时间刺客的领先优势。
如何用异画师对战时间刺客？
当异画师对战时间刺客时，谨慎游戏并避开时间刺客的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 时间刺客 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。