不祥之刃对阵 时间刺客
不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客在LoL版本26.11中是a very close对线。时间刺客以50.9%胜率(+1.8%)击败不祥之刃，基于110场比赛。不祥之刃 wins the early laning phase while 时间刺客 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客对线的最佳不祥之刃出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
不祥之刃对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看不祥之刃对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客对线谁赢？
不祥之刃对战时间刺客对决摘要
不祥之刃对战时间刺客在英雄联盟排位赛中是非常接近的对决。根据110场近期比赛的分析，时间刺客以50.9%的胜率获胜，相比不祥之刃的49.1%，给予时间刺客 1.8个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：不祥之刃控制早期对线阶段，但时间刺客在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——不祥之刃需要在时间刺客达到强势期之前压制优势，而时间刺客应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，时间刺客领先0.5s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 虽然时间刺客略占优势，但不祥之刃绝对可以通过聪明的换血模式和波浪管理赢得这条线。专注于围绕你的冷却时间进行游戏，只在必要时放弃补刀，并利用时间刺客的失误。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
不祥之刃对战时间刺客对线阶段分析
时间刺客在对线阶段对阵不祥之刃时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。时间刺客在补刀, 金币收入, 控制技能 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 不祥之刃 Build Against 时间刺客
灵能使之靴是对抗时间刺客的最佳鞋子选择，提供不祥之刃在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 不祥之刃对抗时间刺客表现最好的核心装备是影焰, 巫妖之祸 和 梅贾的窃魂卷。这一组合给不祥之刃提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在3场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗时间刺客的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为不祥之刃对战时间刺客对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
不祥之刃50.0%
时间刺客50.0%不祥之刃48.2%时间刺客51.8%前期（前15分钟）是不祥之刃和时间刺客之间的抛硬币，不祥之刃以微弱的50.0%胜率优势领先（+0.0%）。个人技术和打野位置在早期对线阶段比英雄优势更重要。
在后期（25分钟以上），时间刺客以51.8%胜率接管，领先不祥之刃 3.6个百分点。时间刺客在团战和目标争夺中成长更有效。
力量动态随着游戏进行而变化——不祥之刃早期有优势，但时间刺客逐渐接管。然而，差距足够小，任何英雄都可以在任何阶段用正确的操作获胜。专注于在有优势时利用它们，而不是等待特定的游戏阶段。
Best 不祥之刃 Runes Against 时间刺客
主宰
精密
主宰主系配精密副系的组合帮助不祥之刃在这场激烈竞争的对决中最大化潜力，提供正确的进攻和防守工具组合来超越时间刺客。
英雄联盟26.11版本不祥之刃对线数据。下表显示不祥之刃对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括不祥之刃最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.70% | 215 | 5.9 | 889 | 12,115 | 52.7% | 49.2% | |
| 48.96% | 192 | 6.0 | 854 | 12,472 | 57.8% | 41.2% | |
| 47.20% | 161 | 6.0 | 962 | 12,567 | 50.8% | 44.8% | |
| 48.73% | 158 | 6.0 | 863 | 11,912 | 50.6% | 46.8% | |
| 46.00% | 150 | 5.7 | 936 | 12,633 | 49.2% | 43.8% | |
| 55.03% | 149 | 6.0 | 948 | 12,656 | 62.9% | 49.4% | |
| 38.97% | 136 | 5.7 | 886 | 11,218 | 32.9% | 47.4% | |
| 44.62% | 130 | 5.8 | 823 | 12,102 | 50.8% | 38.8% | |
| 44.09% | 127 | 5.9 | 876 | 12,073 | 43.1% | 44.9% | |
| 50.79% | 126 | 5.9 | 1,000 | 11,858 | 50.6% | 51.0% | |
| 55.37% | 121 | 5.6 | 909 | 12,448 | 56.4% | 54.5% | |
| 49.09% | 110 | 5.8 | 962 | 12,188 | 50.0% | 48.2% | |
| 51.40% | 107 | 6.0 | 895 | 12,621 | 50.0% | 52.5% | |
| 50.98% | 102 | 5.7 | 964 | 11,399 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 48.48% | 99 | 5.9 | 887 | 12,399 | 46.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 91 | 5.8 | 848 | 12,376 | 65.8% | 45.3% | |
| 56.18% | 89 | 5.8 | 1,020 | 12,048 | 57.8% | 54.5% | |
| 49.41% | 85 | 5.6 | 839 | 10,661 | 45.1% | 55.9% | |
| 55.29% | 85 | 6.4 | 975 | 12,716 | 58.5% | 52.3% | |
| 48.78% | 82 | 5.8 | 972 | 12,233 | 44.4% | 52.2% | |
| 59.72% | 72 | 5.6 | 971 | 13,022 | 54.8% | 63.4% | |
| 61.97% | 71 | 5.7 | 954 | 12,003 | 58.8% | 64.9% | |
| 44.93% | 69 | 5.6 | 830 | 11,012 | 45.7% | 44.1% | |
| 39.13% | 69 | 5.7 | 844 | 11,369 | 43.8% | 35.1% | |
| 38.24% | 68 | 6.0 | 954 | 12,225 | 37.5% | 38.9% | |
| 59.68% | 62 | 5.8 | 1,009 | 13,594 | 61.5% | 58.3% | |
| 43.55% | 62 | 6.0 | 848 | 11,102 | 38.2% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 57 | 5.7 | 884 | 12,206 | 59.4% | 44.0% | |
| 62.50% | 56 | 6.2 | 933 | 12,707 | 75.0% | 53.1% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 6.2 | 968 | 12,199 | 43.8% | 54.2% | |
| 50.91% | 55 | 6.2 | 997 | 11,941 | 48.4% | 54.2% | |
| 42.31% | 52 | 6.0 | 964 | 12,035 | 56.5% | 31.0% | |
| 58.00% | 50 | 5.9 | 1,044 | 13,932 | 70.6% | 51.5% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 5.8 | 956 | 11,528 | 34.4% | 61.1% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 5.5 | 899 | 12,553 | 40.0% | 37.0% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 5.8 | 898 | 12,104 | 50.0% | 64.0% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 6.0 | 981 | 12,597 | 47.6% | 54.5% | |
| 46.51% | 43 | 6.1 | 1,079 | 12,712 | 56.3% | 40.7% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 5.9 | 925 | 12,494 | 58.8% | 45.8% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 5.7 | 965 | 12,716 | 35.0% | 52.9% | |
| 31.25% | 32 | 6.1 | 910 | 11,813 | 26.3% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 5.9 | 845 | 11,799 | 33.3% | 64.7% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 5.8 | 956 | 12,622 | 46.1% | 61.1% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 5.7 | 941 | 11,929 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 5.9 | 1,048 | 13,760 | 85.7% | 35.7% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 6.2 | 970 | 14,607 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.5 | 740 | 11,264 | 30.0% | 70.6% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 5.6 | 744 | 10,872 | 33.3% | 35.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.3 | 1,046 | 12,561 | 36.4% | 69.2% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.5 | 826 | 10,361 | 46.7% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 5.6 | 970 | 13,725 | 27.3% | 53.9% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.9 | 934 | 12,020 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.3 | 947 | 13,833 | 75.0% | 38.5% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 5.5 | 978 | 14,202 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 840 | 12,593 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 914 | 13,004 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 834 | 12,355 | 37.5% | 58.3% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.8 | 937 | 13,224 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 26.32% | 19 | 5.9 | 886 | 10,531 | 27.3% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 5.5 | 818 | 12,254 | 22.2% | 66.7% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 5.6 | 882 | 12,838 | 28.6% | 40.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 5.5 | 833 | 10,591 | 25.0% | 37.5% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.0 | 1,033 | 12,799 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,171 | 15,732 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.6 | 1,148 | 14,140 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.9 | 1,031 | 13,271 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.0 | 756 | 11,371 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.3 | 939 | 12,294 | 71.4% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.1 | 771 | 11,408 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.3 | 1,229 | 11,907 | 25.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.9 | 861 | 11,175 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.2 | 801 | 13,301 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 1,103 | 14,079 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 737 | 11,169 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 969 | 10,759 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.1 | 944 | 14,876 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 957 | 12,122 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 987 | 11,183 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 932 | 13,248 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.2 | 986 | 15,518 | 50.0% | 85.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.2 | 1,025 | 14,456 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 1,093 | 12,094 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 5.7 | 586 | 9,011 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 1,159 | 15,199 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 552 | 7,264 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.5 | 1,050 | 14,547 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 870 | 10,243 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.4 | 1,064 | 13,831 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.6 | 1,296 | 11,826 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 990 | 11,819 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 819 | 9,081 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.9 | 1,124 | 14,169 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 793 | 10,190 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 5.2 | 832 | 16,245 | 0.0% | 14.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.3 | 785 | 11,282 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.1 | 1,353 | 12,978 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 920 | 12,603 | 20.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.9 | 1,147 | 12,786 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 698 | 8,898 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 1,634 | 12,698 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 1,344 | 14,948 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 892 | 13,372 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 935 | 11,327 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 1,126 | 9,516 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，不祥之刃对时间刺客表现如何？
时间刺客以50.9%的胜率赢得不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客的对决，而不祥之刃为49.1%，相差1.8个百分点。该数据基于26.11版本的110场近期排位赛。
在前期，不祥之刃对时间刺客表现如何？
在前期，不祥之刃对时间刺客占有优势，胜率为50.0%对50.0%。不祥之刃玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，不祥之刃对时间刺客表现如何？
在后期，时间刺客以51.8%对48.2%的胜率主导不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客的对决。时间刺客在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客的对决？
时间刺客在英雄联盟26.11版本中以50.9%的胜率赢得对不祥之刃的对决。1.8个百分点的优势意味着根据110场分析的比赛，时间刺客在这个线上对决中slightly占优。
对抗时间刺客的最佳不祥之刃出装是什么？
对抗时间刺客的最佳不祥之刃出装包括影焰, 巫妖之祸, 梅贾的窃魂卷 with 灵能使之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗时间刺客的最佳不祥之刃符文是什么？
对抗时间刺客的最佳不祥之刃符文使用主宰主系和精密副系。This rune setup achieves a 54.5% win rate in the 不祥之刃 vs 时间刺客 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
不祥之刃克制时间刺客吗？
不，不祥之刃对抗时间刺客时表现吃力，胜率仅为49.1%。时间刺客在这个对决中占优。不祥之刃玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少时间刺客的领先优势。
如何用不祥之刃对战时间刺客？
当不祥之刃对战时间刺客时，谨慎游戏并避开时间刺客的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 时间刺客 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。