盲僧对阵 迷失之牙
盲僧 vs 迷失之牙在LoL版本26.10中是a decisive对线。迷失之牙以80.0%胜率(+60.0%)击败盲僧，基于5场比赛。迷失之牙 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到盲僧 vs 迷失之牙对线的最佳盲僧出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
盲僧 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 盲僧 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
迷失之牙(20.0%)Who Wins the 盲僧 vs 迷失之牙 Matchup?
盲僧对战迷失之牙对决摘要
盲僧对战迷失之牙在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据5场近期比赛的分析，迷失之牙以80.0%的胜率获胜，相比盲僧的20.0%，给予迷失之牙 60.0个百分点的优势。 迷失之牙在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使盲僧玩家难以找到有利窗口，因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，迷失之牙领先0.6s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 迷失之牙在这场对决中有强大优势。盲僧玩家应该防守性地游戏，优先在塔下安全发育，并寻找由打野压力或迷失之牙过度前压创造的机会。避免长时间换血，等待团战，那里的位置和协调更重要。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
盲僧对战迷失之牙对线阶段分析
迷失之牙在对线阶段对阵盲僧时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。迷失之牙在伤害, 金币收入 和 控制技能方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 盲僧 Build Against 迷失之牙
铁板靴是对抗迷失之牙的最佳鞋子选择，提供盲僧在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 盲僧对抗迷失之牙表现最好的核心装备是星蚀, 焚天 和 无穷饥渴。这一组合给盲僧提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为盲僧对战迷失之牙对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
盲僧0.0%迷失之牙100.0%盲僧33.3%迷失之牙66.7%迷失之牙以令人印象深刻的100.0%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先盲僧 100.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着迷失之牙可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
迷失之牙在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有66.7%胜率——比盲僧高33.3点。长时间游戏强烈有利于迷失之牙，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
迷失之牙在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势，使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。盲僧玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人，而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 盲僧 Runes Against 迷失之牙
精密
坚决
精密和坚决符文设置给盲僧在这场困难对决中与迷失之牙竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.10版本盲僧对线数据。下表显示盲僧对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括盲僧最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.90% | 316 | 0.9 | 654 | 12,526 | 51.0% | 52.7% | |
| 49.00% | 300 | 0.8 | 685 | 12,510 | 50.4% | 48.1% | |
| 50.71% | 280 | 0.8 | 648 | 12,678 | 50.4% | 51.0% | |
| 46.64% | 268 | 0.9 | 671 | 12,518 | 47.4% | 46.0% | |
| 42.86% | 252 | 0.8 | 629 | 12,439 | 43.4% | 42.5% | |
| 53.82% | 249 | 0.8 | 623 | 12,581 | 60.5% | 48.1% | |
| 50.69% | 217 | 0.8 | 653 | 12,176 | 47.3% | 53.2% | |
| 47.12% | 191 | 0.9 | 633 | 11,788 | 42.4% | 51.5% | |
| 43.72% | 183 | 0.9 | 637 | 12,912 | 44.9% | 42.9% | |
| 42.31% | 156 | 0.8 | 633 | 12,118 | 47.6% | 38.7% | |
| 44.16% | 154 | 0.8 | 708 | 11,660 | 47.5% | 40.5% | |
| 46.90% | 145 | 0.8 | 634 | 12,826 | 47.5% | 46.4% | |
| 46.04% | 139 | 0.9 | 628 | 12,745 | 44.6% | 47.0% | |
| 49.24% | 132 | 0.8 | 675 | 12,266 | 51.0% | 48.1% | |
| 62.39% | 117 | 0.8 | 702 | 13,472 | 68.8% | 58.0% | |
| 41.74% | 115 | 0.8 | 613 | 11,834 | 37.5% | 45.8% | |
| 39.09% | 110 | 0.9 | 666 | 12,248 | 41.1% | 37.0% | |
| 38.32% | 107 | 1.1 | 609 | 12,376 | 33.3% | 41.2% | |
| 53.27% | 107 | 0.9 | 662 | 12,292 | 54.5% | 51.9% | |
| 45.54% | 101 | 0.9 | 621 | 12,084 | 44.9% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 0.9 | 663 | 11,726 | 54.0% | 46.0% | |
| 55.67% | 97 | 1.1 | 716 | 13,159 | 54.8% | 56.4% | |
| 44.21% | 95 | 0.8 | 652 | 11,769 | 49.0% | 38.6% | |
| 50.54% | 93 | 0.8 | 697 | 11,498 | 57.1% | 43.2% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 1.0 | 698 | 12,806 | 51.1% | 46.7% | |
| 44.32% | 88 | 1.1 | 624 | 11,769 | 46.3% | 42.5% | |
| 54.22% | 83 | 1.2 | 654 | 12,270 | 55.3% | 53.3% | |
| 48.15% | 81 | 0.9 | 638 | 12,154 | 52.3% | 43.2% | |
| 47.50% | 80 | 0.8 | 676 | 12,743 | 48.5% | 46.8% | |
| 49.35% | 77 | 0.8 | 702 | 12,061 | 51.4% | 47.6% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 1.0 | 655 | 13,032 | 53.6% | 51.1% | |
| 48.61% | 72 | 0.8 | 692 | 12,151 | 56.7% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 65 | 0.9 | 733 | 12,527 | 64.3% | 46.0% | |
| 49.15% | 59 | 0.9 | 658 | 14,088 | 44.4% | 51.2% | |
| 54.24% | 59 | 0.9 | 636 | 12,150 | 50.0% | 57.6% | |
| 41.38% | 58 | 1.1 | 651 | 11,975 | 53.6% | 30.0% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 1.6 | 677 | 12,935 | 47.8% | 56.3% | |
| 40.38% | 52 | 2.3 | 653 | 12,403 | 44.4% | 38.2% | |
| 42.00% | 50 | 0.8 | 661 | 13,828 | 33.3% | 46.9% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 0.7 | 692 | 11,734 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 0.9 | 744 | 12,688 | 55.0% | 44.4% | |
| 34.04% | 47 | 1.0 | 571 | 12,661 | 44.4% | 27.6% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 0.8 | 580 | 10,700 | 55.0% | 52.2% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.5 | 655 | 11,915 | 60.9% | 42.9% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 0.9 | 684 | 12,644 | 52.9% | 64.7% | |
| 31.25% | 32 | 2.2 | 634 | 11,927 | 25.0% | 35.0% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 0.9 | 684 | 11,372 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 0.8 | 684 | 12,321 | 63.6% | 57.9% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 1.8 | 768 | 10,331 | 52.9% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 0.9 | 628 | 10,842 | 31.3% | 58.3% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 2.5 | 659 | 10,261 | 37.5% | 41.7% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 2.1 | 716 | 13,625 | 63.6% | 25.0% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 0.8 | 626 | 11,697 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 1.2 | 702 | 13,658 | 42.9% | 31.6% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 2.8 | 760 | 13,633 | 83.3% | 36.8% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 1.3 | 608 | 12,090 | 66.7% | 15.4% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.2 | 601 | 10,972 | 46.1% | 54.5% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.4 | 634 | 12,662 | 58.3% | 66.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.7 | 659 | 13,678 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 1.2 | 643 | 11,043 | 38.5% | 70.0% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.3 | 697 | 11,123 | 27.3% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 2.2 | 757 | 10,294 | 69.2% | 22.2% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 2.6 | 750 | 11,113 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.2 | 698 | 12,536 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.4 | 590 | 10,595 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.6 | 605 | 12,432 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 0.7 | 693 | 12,364 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 1.3 | 651 | 11,904 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 1.6 | 638 | 10,251 | 60.0% | 77.8% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.3 | 496 | 9,454 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.0 | 868 | 13,042 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 3.6 | 675 | 11,315 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.6 | 783 | 10,987 | 55.6% | 25.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.0 | 703 | 12,775 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.4 | 580 | 11,810 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 18.18% | 11 | 1.6 | 493 | 10,126 | 33.3% | 12.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 586 | 12,279 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 3.7 | 599 | 7,130 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 583 | 9,947 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 700 | 9,456 | 16.7% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 801 | 13,737 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.5 | 991 | 12,776 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 718 | 12,240 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 0.8 | 608 | 13,538 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.0 | 584 | 12,712 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.2 | 884 | 13,026 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.7 | 1,015 | 14,855 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.2 | 966 | 13,502 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.7 | 795 | 14,660 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 527 | 11,402 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 985 | 13,222 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 626 | 10,563 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 5.7 | 712 | 13,386 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 3.5 | 792 | 9,633 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 4.3 | 552 | 6,752 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.7 | 624 | 8,794 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.6 | 448 | 9,673 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 703 | 12,375 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.0 | 901 | 12,529 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.4 | 815 | 11,484 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.7 | 663 | 12,993 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.7 | 659 | 11,845 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 893 | 12,899 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 907 | 10,538 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 1,062 | 12,372 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.2 | 835 | 16,576 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 689 | 10,671 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 829 | 14,021 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.2 | 980 | 12,405 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 631 | 12,380 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 793 | 12,860 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 785 | 12,100 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 467 | 8,465 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 534 | 8,585 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 398 | 8,834 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
盲僧 vs 迷失之牙 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，盲僧对迷失之牙表现如何？
迷失之牙以80.0%的胜率赢得盲僧 vs 迷失之牙的对决，而盲僧为20.0%，相差60.0个百分点。该数据基于26.10版本的5场近期排位赛。
在前期，盲僧对迷失之牙表现如何？
在前期，迷失之牙对盲僧占有优势，胜率为100.0%对0.0%。迷失之牙玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，盲僧对迷失之牙表现如何？
在后期，迷失之牙以66.7%对33.3%的胜率主导盲僧 vs 迷失之牙的对决。迷失之牙在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得盲僧 vs 迷失之牙的对决？
迷失之牙在英雄联盟26.10版本中以80.0%的胜率赢得对盲僧的对决。60.0个百分点的优势意味着根据5场分析的比赛，迷失之牙在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗迷失之牙的最佳盲僧出装是什么？
对抗迷失之牙的最佳盲僧出装包括星蚀, 焚天, 无穷饥渴 with 铁板靴。 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗迷失之牙的最佳盲僧符文是什么？
对抗迷失之牙的最佳盲僧符文使用精密主系和坚决副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 盲僧 vs 迷失之牙 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
盲僧克制迷失之牙吗？
不，盲僧对抗迷失之牙时表现吃力，胜率仅为20.0%。迷失之牙在这个对决中占优。盲僧玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少迷失之牙的领先优势。
如何用盲僧对战迷失之牙？
当盲僧对战迷失之牙时，谨慎游戏并避开迷失之牙的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 迷失之牙 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。