含羞蓓蕾对阵 恶魔小丑
含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑在LoL版本26.4中是a very close对线。含羞蓓蕾以50.0%胜率(+0.0%)击败恶魔小丑，基于116场比赛。恶魔小丑 wins the early laning phase while 含羞蓓蕾 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑对线的最佳含羞蓓蕾出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
含羞蓓蕾 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 含羞蓓蕾 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
恶魔小丑(50.0%)Who Wins the 含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑 Matchup?
含羞蓓蕾对战恶魔小丑对决摘要
含羞蓓蕾对战恶魔小丑在英雄联盟排位赛中是本质上是五五开的对决。根据116场近期比赛的分析，含羞蓓蕾以50.0%的胜率获胜，相比恶魔小丑的50.0%，给予含羞蓓蕾 0.0个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：恶魔小丑控制早期对线阶段，但含羞蓓蕾在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——恶魔小丑需要在含羞蓓蕾达到强势期之前压制优势，而含羞蓓蕾应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在续航方面，含羞蓓蕾领先685 HP/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 含羞蓓蕾有统计优势，但差距足够接近，尊重恶魔小丑的优势很重要。在冷却时间有利时换血，追踪敌方打野，并朝着你最强的装备节点构建，将轻微优势转化为决定性领先。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
含羞蓓蕾对战恶魔小丑对线阶段分析
含羞蓓蕾在对线阶段对阵恶魔小丑时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的5个。含羞蓓蕾在补刀, 伤害, 金币收入, 控制技能 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 含羞蓓蕾 Build Against 恶魔小丑
明朗之靴是对抗恶魔小丑的最佳鞋子选择，提供含羞蓓蕾在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 含羞蓓蕾对抗恶魔小丑表现最好的核心装备是放血者的诅咒, 兰德里的折磨 和 裂隙制造者。这一组合给含羞蓓蕾提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在4场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗恶魔小丑的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为含羞蓓蕾对战恶魔小丑对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
含羞蓓蕾47.7%恶魔小丑52.3%含羞蓓蕾51.4%恶魔小丑48.6%在早期对线阶段（前15分钟），恶魔小丑有显著的52.3%胜率，超过含羞蓓蕾 4.5个百分点。恶魔小丑玩家应该通过激进换血、兵线优先权和早期与打野的协调来压制这一优势。
在后期（25分钟以上），含羞蓓蕾以51.4%胜率接管，领先恶魔小丑 2.8个百分点。含羞蓓蕾在团战和目标争夺中成长更有效。
力量动态随着游戏进行而变化——恶魔小丑早期有优势，但含羞蓓蕾逐渐接管。然而，差距足够小，任何英雄都可以在任何阶段用正确的操作获胜。专注于在有优势时利用它们，而不是等待特定的游戏阶段。
Best 含羞蓓蕾 Runes Against 恶魔小丑
精密
启迪
精密主系配启迪副系的组合帮助含羞蓓蕾在这场激烈竞争的对决中最大化潜力，提供正确的进攻和防守工具组合来超越恶魔小丑。
英雄联盟26.4版本含羞蓓蕾对线数据。下表显示含羞蓓蕾对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括含羞蓓蕾最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.23% | 216 | 1.1 | 722 | 12,150 | 50.5% | 50.0% | |
| 45.35% | 173 | 1.2 | 743 | 13,179 | 46.4% | 44.7% | |
| 44.91% | 167 | 1.1 | 823 | 13,063 | 48.4% | 42.9% | |
| 47.14% | 140 | 1.2 | 782 | 13,088 | 42.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.52% | 135 | 1.1 | 714 | 12,759 | 42.6% | 47.5% | |
| 51.11% | 135 | 1.1 | 788 | 12,911 | 51.9% | 50.6% | |
| 47.37% | 133 | 1.4 | 931 | 11,963 | 54.5% | 40.3% | |
| 50.00% | 122 | 1.1 | 759 | 12,469 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 49.17% | 121 | 1.1 | 812 | 12,665 | 51.7% | 46.8% | |
| 47.90% | 120 | 1.2 | 825 | 12,549 | 48.0% | 47.8% | |
| 50.00% | 116 | 1.3 | 772 | 13,387 | 47.7% | 51.4% | |
| 54.55% | 110 | 1.5 | 799 | 12,120 | 47.9% | 59.7% | |
| 53.77% | 106 | 1.2 | 776 | 12,504 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 48.00% | 101 | 1.3 | 854 | 12,905 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 49.45% | 91 | 1.3 | 793 | 13,196 | 45.0% | 52.9% | |
| 50.56% | 90 | 1.4 | 768 | 12,531 | 43.9% | 56.3% | |
| 52.87% | 87 | 1.3 | 770 | 12,738 | 44.7% | 59.2% | |
| 52.56% | 78 | 1.2 | 787 | 12,711 | 55.9% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 76 | 1.1 | 751 | 12,309 | 47.2% | 46.1% | |
| 50.67% | 76 | 1.1 | 780 | 12,018 | 54.3% | 47.5% | |
| 54.79% | 75 | 1.2 | 793 | 12,440 | 44.7% | 65.7% | |
| 52.11% | 73 | 1.8 | 734 | 13,367 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 50.68% | 73 | 1.1 | 865 | 12,696 | 45.2% | 54.8% | |
| 62.32% | 70 | 1.2 | 760 | 12,988 | 66.7% | 59.0% | |
| 54.69% | 65 | 1.1 | 692 | 12,182 | 53.1% | 56.3% | |
| 54.69% | 64 | 1.3 | 881 | 12,918 | 55.6% | 54.0% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 1.3 | 864 | 12,774 | 62.5% | 47.1% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 1.2 | 952 | 13,021 | 50.0% | 48.4% | |
| 50.91% | 55 | 1.0 | 684 | 11,888 | 50.0% | 51.6% | |
| 56.00% | 52 | 1.1 | 842 | 14,672 | 46.1% | 59.5% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 1.2 | 794 | 13,313 | 55.6% | 42.4% | |
| 40.00% | 50 | 1.3 | 743 | 12,570 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 53.19% | 47 | 1.4 | 695 | 12,982 | 42.9% | 61.5% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 1.2 | 738 | 12,974 | 47.1% | 42.9% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 1.2 | 821 | 13,418 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 61.36% | 44 | 1.5 | 758 | 13,235 | 61.9% | 60.9% | |
| 39.53% | 44 | 1.1 | 768 | 12,513 | 39.1% | 40.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 2.1 | 838 | 11,779 | 45.0% | 52.4% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 1.5 | 932 | 13,040 | 53.3% | 48.0% | |
| 61.54% | 39 | 1.3 | 696 | 12,856 | 64.3% | 60.0% | |
| 52.63% | 39 | 1.3 | 787 | 12,827 | 52.6% | 52.6% | |
| 63.16% | 38 | 2.0 | 925 | 13,822 | 84.6% | 52.0% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.2 | 851 | 12,002 | 58.8% | 55.6% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.4 | 700 | 10,419 | 39.1% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.1 | 794 | 11,416 | 53.3% | 52.6% | |
| 60.61% | 33 | 1.4 | 860 | 14,084 | 83.3% | 47.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.2 | 757 | 14,197 | 75.0% | 45.8% | |
| 34.48% | 31 | 1.1 | 707 | 12,517 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 2.3 | 757 | 11,596 | 33.3% | 53.3% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 1.9 | 788 | 11,830 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.1 | 691 | 12,617 | 22.2% | 78.6% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 2.5 | 728 | 11,459 | 50.0% | 36.4% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 2.1 | 845 | 12,397 | 45.5% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 811 | 12,843 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 19 | 2.1 | 806 | 12,035 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 1.1 | 777 | 12,248 | 25.0% | 36.4% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 1.7 | 774 | 13,913 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 2.0 | 910 | 13,092 | 83.3% | 54.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.7 | 949 | 13,228 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 88.24% | 17 | 2.4 | 901 | 13,107 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 16 | 1.1 | 666 | 12,325 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.3 | 805 | 14,621 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.2 | 870 | 12,866 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.6 | 1,005 | 13,014 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 72.73% | 12 | 0.9 | 760 | 12,906 | 50.0% | 85.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 3.9 | 733 | 10,885 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.1 | 764 | 14,005 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 0.8 | 632 | 9,281 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 745 | 11,221 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 891 | 13,573 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.4 | 890 | 11,593 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.4 | 800 | 11,668 | 100.0% | 42.9% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.4 | 845 | 14,023 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 9 | 2.7 | 1,033 | 12,232 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.8 | 942 | 12,798 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.3 | 697 | 10,589 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.2 | 885 | 7,880 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.5 | 751 | 11,250 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.8 | 979 | 10,946 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.7 | 905 | 11,499 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 590 | 11,810 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.3 | 660 | 10,262 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.6 | 706 | 13,163 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 456 | 7,052 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 757 | 10,552 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 978 | 15,256 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 998 | 11,517 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.8 | 625 | 10,094 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，含羞蓓蕾对恶魔小丑表现如何？
含羞蓓蕾以50.0%的胜率赢得含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑的对决，而恶魔小丑为50.0%，相差0.0个百分点。该数据基于26.4版本的116场近期排位赛。
在前期，含羞蓓蕾对恶魔小丑表现如何？
在前期，恶魔小丑对含羞蓓蕾占有优势，胜率为52.3%对47.7%。恶魔小丑玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，含羞蓓蕾对恶魔小丑表现如何？
在后期，含羞蓓蕾以51.4%对48.6%的胜率主导含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑的对决。含羞蓓蕾在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑的对决？
含羞蓓蕾在英雄联盟26.4版本中以50.0%的胜率赢得对恶魔小丑的对决。0.0个百分点的优势意味着根据116场分析的比赛，含羞蓓蕾在这个线上对决中slightly占优。
对抗恶魔小丑的最佳含羞蓓蕾出装是什么？
对抗恶魔小丑的最佳含羞蓓蕾出装包括放血者的诅咒, 兰德里的折磨, 裂隙制造者 with 明朗之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗恶魔小丑的最佳含羞蓓蕾符文是什么？
对抗恶魔小丑的最佳含羞蓓蕾符文使用精密主系和启迪副系。This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the 含羞蓓蕾 vs 恶魔小丑 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
含羞蓓蕾克制恶魔小丑吗？
是的，含羞蓓蕾对恶魔小丑有利，胜率为50.0%。根据当前26.4版本数据，含羞蓓蕾在线上slightly edges out恶魔小丑。
如何用含羞蓓蕾对战恶魔小丑？
当含羞蓓蕾对战恶魔小丑时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform 恶魔小丑. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。