放逐之刃对阵 猩红收割者
放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者在LoL版本26.11中是a moderate对线。猩红收割者以51.7%胜率(+3.4%)击败放逐之刃，基于29场比赛。放逐之刃 wins the early laning phase while 猩红收割者 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者对线的最佳放逐之刃出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
放逐之刃对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看放逐之刃对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者对线谁赢？
放逐之刃对战猩红收割者对决摘要
放逐之刃对战猩红收割者在英雄联盟排位赛中是中等程度的对决。根据29场近期比赛的分析，猩红收割者以51.7%的胜率获胜，相比放逐之刃的48.3%，给予猩红收割者 3.4个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：放逐之刃控制早期对线阶段，但猩红收割者在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——放逐之刃需要在猩红收割者达到强势期之前压制优势，而猩红收割者应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，放逐之刃领先0.9s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 虽然猩红收割者略占优势，但放逐之刃绝对可以通过聪明的换血模式和波浪管理赢得这条线。专注于围绕你的冷却时间进行游戏，只在必要时放弃补刀，并利用猩红收割者的失误。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
放逐之刃对战猩红收割者对线阶段分析
猩红收割者在对线阶段对阵放逐之刃时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。猩红收割者在补刀, 伤害 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 放逐之刃 Build Against 猩红收割者
不朽之路是对抗猩红收割者的最佳鞋子选择，提供放逐之刃在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 放逐之刃对抗猩红收割者表现最好的核心装备是公理圆弧, 死亡之舞 和 无穷饥渴。这一组合给放逐之刃提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在4场比赛中达到75.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗猩红收割者的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为放逐之刃对战猩红收割者对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
放逐之刃61.5%
猩红收割者38.5%放逐之刃37.5%猩红收割者62.5%放逐之刃以令人印象深刻的61.5%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先猩红收割者 23.1个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着放逐之刃可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
猩红收割者在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有62.5%胜率——比放逐之刃高25.0点。长时间游戏强烈有利于猩红收割者，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
这场对决有戏剧性的力量转变：放逐之刃必须积极压制早期优势并在猩红收割者达到成长节点之前结束游戏。如果猩红收割者在不太落后的情况下度过对线阶段，对决将倾向于他们。龙和峡谷先锋控制至关重要——确保早期目标的队伍可以滚雪球或争取时间成长。
Best 放逐之刃 Runes Against 猩红收割者
精密
启迪
精密和启迪符文设置给放逐之刃在这场困难对决中与猩红收割者竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.11版本放逐之刃对线数据。下表显示放逐之刃对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括放逐之刃最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.10% | 133 | 6.4 | 652 | 11,902 | 31.0% | 45.3% | |
| 42.99% | 107 | 6.5 | 587 | 11,583 | 36.4% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 6.5 | 754 | 12,311 | 46.9% | 52.9% | |
| 44.44% | 99 | 6.2 | 673 | 12,842 | 41.7% | 46.0% | |
| 44.90% | 98 | 6.3 | 784 | 11,969 | 50.0% | 40.4% | |
| 48.31% | 89 | 6.3 | 683 | 10,900 | 49.0% | 47.5% | |
| 48.19% | 83 | 6.1 | 772 | 12,248 | 48.6% | 47.9% | |
| 47.95% | 73 | 6.6 | 786 | 13,066 | 56.3% | 41.5% | |
| 50.72% | 69 | 6.4 | 674 | 11,069 | 47.4% | 54.8% | |
| 60.00% | 65 | 6.7 | 780 | 12,662 | 56.7% | 62.9% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 6.9 | 923 | 12,190 | 52.0% | 36.4% | |
| 51.72% | 58 | 6.6 | 716 | 12,989 | 54.2% | 50.0% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 6.8 | 1,027 | 12,851 | 42.3% | 60.0% | |
| 58.93% | 56 | 6.3 | 718 | 13,085 | 60.0% | 58.1% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 6.4 | 726 | 11,852 | 48.1% | 57.1% | |
| 40.00% | 55 | 6.1 | 656 | 12,329 | 25.0% | 48.6% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 6.5 | 757 | 12,243 | 52.0% | 51.7% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 6.4 | 691 | 11,380 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 6.1 | 573 | 11,435 | 20.8% | 65.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 6.6 | 638 | 12,310 | 37.5% | 53.9% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 6.2 | 638 | 10,749 | 29.2% | 58.3% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 6.6 | 810 | 13,027 | 54.2% | 41.7% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 6.6 | 733 | 11,572 | 48.0% | 73.9% | |
| 37.50% | 48 | 6.7 | 788 | 12,487 | 35.0% | 39.3% | |
| 61.70% | 47 | 6.5 | 765 | 12,118 | 77.3% | 48.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 6.4 | 728 | 12,495 | 47.1% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 44 | 6.5 | 770 | 12,294 | 58.3% | 70.0% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 7.0 | 765 | 12,249 | 40.9% | 66.7% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 6.4 | 777 | 12,408 | 47.1% | 36.0% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 6.0 | 643 | 12,687 | 50.0% | 54.2% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.8 | 921 | 14,205 | 65.0% | 47.1% | |
| 58.33% | 36 | 6.5 | 744 | 11,634 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 6.3 | 639 | 12,348 | 53.9% | 59.1% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 5.9 | 598 | 11,224 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.9 | 701 | 11,887 | 38.5% | 63.2% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.9 | 815 | 12,135 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 38.71% | 31 | 6.3 | 574 | 10,530 | 21.4% | 52.9% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 6.7 | 675 | 12,075 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.2 | 609 | 11,313 | 44.4% | 61.5% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 6.3 | 590 | 11,841 | 46.1% | 29.4% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 6.3 | 707 | 11,048 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 6.5 | 711 | 12,529 | 35.7% | 60.0% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 6.7 | 857 | 13,247 | 61.5% | 37.5% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 6.1 | 581 | 11,691 | 37.5% | 46.1% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 6.3 | 710 | 12,417 | 78.6% | 41.7% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 6.6 | 641 | 10,755 | 58.8% | 55.6% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 6.4 | 889 | 13,062 | 61.5% | 69.2% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 5.9 | 807 | 14,823 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 3.9 | 659 | 12,904 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 6.4 | 737 | 13,022 | 41.7% | 38.5% | |
| 72.00% | 25 | 6.5 | 822 | 12,210 | 53.9% | 91.7% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 6.8 | 658 | 13,056 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.2 | 858 | 13,148 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 6.7 | 821 | 12,197 | 46.7% | 22.2% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 5.8 | 649 | 11,520 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 5.8 | 649 | 13,247 | 55.6% | 64.3% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 6.3 | 720 | 10,944 | 53.9% | 80.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 6.0 | 713 | 11,787 | 37.5% | 64.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.5 | 663 | 13,310 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.2 | 841 | 12,376 | 45.5% | 54.5% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.4 | 760 | 15,319 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 720 | 10,188 | 10.0% | 40.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 6.3 | 780 | 11,446 | 38.5% | 66.7% | |
| 26.32% | 19 | 6.2 | 645 | 10,926 | 25.0% | 27.3% | |
| 78.95% | 19 | 6.6 | 825 | 12,909 | 100.0% | 63.6% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 6.9 | 916 | 14,745 | 60.0% | 64.3% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.2 | 818 | 12,014 | 46.1% | 40.0% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 4.2 | 665 | 12,527 | 62.5% | 22.2% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.1 | 641 | 11,625 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.3 | 604 | 10,281 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 4.8 | 864 | 14,027 | 83.3% | 55.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 4.9 | 696 | 12,694 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.0 | 498 | 9,727 | 30.0% | 60.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 6.2 | 616 | 12,310 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 6.5 | 752 | 11,830 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 7.0 | 843 | 13,856 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 6.9 | 558 | 11,587 | 50.0% | 12.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.0 | 746 | 12,393 | 60.0% | 44.4% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.3 | 737 | 14,415 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.7 | 771 | 14,257 | 80.0% | 44.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.2 | 726 | 12,350 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.4 | 722 | 13,500 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.4 | 842 | 13,131 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 4.1 | 693 | 11,221 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.5 | 759 | 13,380 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 6.4 | 779 | 12,606 | 40.0% | 14.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 572 | 11,427 | 28.6% | 60.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.5 | 676 | 15,369 | 40.0% | 83.3% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 7.0 | 688 | 15,635 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 648 | 11,863 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 7.1 | 803 | 12,760 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 656 | 14,493 | 66.7% | 85.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 915 | 13,962 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.5 | 594 | 13,423 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.1 | 716 | 13,714 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.5 | 582 | 11,086 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 785 | 15,019 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.7 | 859 | 12,726 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 4.4 | 667 | 12,694 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.3 | 956 | 12,833 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 495 | 8,006 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 704 | 12,675 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.5 | 784 | 14,590 | 66.7% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 491 | 10,946 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.2 | 638 | 15,590 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.3 | 726 | 12,235 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.6 | 688 | 12,994 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.5 | 549 | 9,648 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 817 | 14,998 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 550 | 12,201 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.6 | 739 | 11,299 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 792 | 12,811 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.6 | 767 | 13,105 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 764 | 15,282 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，放逐之刃对猩红收割者表现如何？
猩红收割者以51.7%的胜率赢得放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者的对决，而放逐之刃为48.3%，相差3.4个百分点。该数据基于26.11版本的29场近期排位赛。
在前期，放逐之刃对猩红收割者表现如何？
在前期，放逐之刃对猩红收割者占有优势，胜率为61.5%对38.5%。放逐之刃玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，放逐之刃对猩红收割者表现如何？
在后期，猩红收割者以62.5%对37.5%的胜率主导放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者的对决。猩红收割者在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者的对决？
猩红收割者在英雄联盟26.11版本中以51.7%的胜率赢得对放逐之刃的对决。3.4个百分点的优势意味着根据29场分析的比赛，猩红收割者在这个线上对决中moderately占优。
对抗猩红收割者的最佳放逐之刃出装是什么？
对抗猩红收割者的最佳放逐之刃出装包括公理圆弧, 死亡之舞, 无穷饥渴 with 不朽之路。This build achieves a 75.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗猩红收割者的最佳放逐之刃符文是什么？
对抗猩红收割者的最佳放逐之刃符文使用精密主系和启迪副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 放逐之刃 vs 猩红收割者 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
放逐之刃克制猩红收割者吗？
不，放逐之刃对抗猩红收割者时表现吃力，胜率仅为48.3%。猩红收割者在这个对决中占优。放逐之刃玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少猩红收割者的领先优势。
如何用放逐之刃对战猩红收割者？
当放逐之刃对战猩红收割者时，谨慎游戏并避开猩红收割者的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 猩红收割者 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。