瘟疫之源对阵 残月之肃
瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃在LoL版本26.7中是a decisive对线。瘟疫之源以57.1%胜率(+14.3%)击败残月之肃，基于63场比赛。瘟疫之源 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃对线的最佳瘟疫之源出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
瘟疫之源 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 瘟疫之源 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
残月之肃(57.1%)Who Wins the 瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃 Matchup?
瘟疫之源对战残月之肃对决摘要
瘟疫之源对战残月之肃在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据63场近期比赛的分析，瘟疫之源以57.1%的胜率获胜，相比残月之肃的42.9%，给予瘟疫之源 14.3个百分点的优势。 瘟疫之源在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使残月之肃玩家难以找到有利窗口，因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，残月之肃领先0.2s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 瘟疫之源玩家可以自信地选择对抗残月之肃并从1级开始激进地游戏。尽早通过有利的换血建立线上统治权，并尽可能将残月之肃从补刀中挤走。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
瘟疫之源对战残月之肃对线阶段分析
残月之肃在对线阶段对阵瘟疫之源时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。残月之肃在补刀, 控制技能 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Early Game vs Late Game
瘟疫之源63.3%残月之肃36.7%瘟疫之源51.5%残月之肃48.5%瘟疫之源以令人印象深刻的63.3%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先残月之肃 26.7个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着瘟疫之源可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
在后期（25分钟以上），瘟疫之源以51.5%胜率接管，领先残月之肃 3.0个百分点。瘟疫之源在团战和目标争夺中成长更有效。
瘟疫之源在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势，使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。残月之肃玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人，而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 瘟疫之源 Runes Against 残月之肃
精密
巫术
使用精密主系配巫术副系允许瘟疫之源压制对残月之肃的优势，放大使这场对决有利的优势。
英雄联盟26.7版本瘟疫之源对线数据。下表显示瘟疫之源对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括瘟疫之源最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.64% | 274 | 5.6 | 902 | 13,884 | 38.1% | 58.3% | |
| 47.13% | 261 | 5.8 | 946 | 14,018 | 36.8% | 55.6% | |
| 54.85% | 237 | 5.6 | 924 | 14,025 | 51.5% | 57.4% | |
| 53.95% | 228 | 5.9 | 992 | 14,314 | 53.6% | 54.2% | |
| 52.20% | 205 | 5.8 | 953 | 13,986 | 46.3% | 56.1% | |
| 52.82% | 195 | 6.0 | 978 | 14,699 | 51.3% | 53.8% | |
| 45.32% | 139 | 5.9 | 947 | 13,746 | 37.0% | 54.5% | |
| 53.28% | 137 | 5.9 | 1,025 | 15,045 | 47.6% | 58.1% | |
| 48.70% | 115 | 5.9 | 972 | 14,843 | 38.5% | 57.1% | |
| 57.61% | 92 | 6.1 | 983 | 14,913 | 51.2% | 62.8% | |
| 46.05% | 76 | 5.7 | 885 | 14,002 | 39.4% | 51.2% | |
| 42.11% | 76 | 5.9 | 933 | 13,642 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.48% | 71 | 5.9 | 954 | 14,217 | 46.9% | 46.1% | |
| 57.14% | 63 | 6.0 | 947 | 13,888 | 63.3% | 51.5% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 5.8 | 967 | 14,575 | 46.4% | 51.4% | |
| 62.30% | 61 | 6.0 | 918 | 14,157 | 50.0% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 5.8 | 915 | 13,515 | 45.0% | 53.6% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 5.5 | 980 | 15,009 | 46.7% | 57.6% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 5.9 | 989 | 15,367 | 63.6% | 53.6% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 6.0 | 909 | 13,610 | 53.3% | 31.8% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 5.4 | 933 | 14,785 | 28.6% | 60.7% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 6.0 | 879 | 13,540 | 23.1% | 42.9% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 5.8 | 1,102 | 15,870 | 33.3% | 68.4% | |
| 62.07% | 29 | 5.6 | 983 | 14,556 | 42.9% | 80.0% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 6.2 | 1,126 | 15,187 | 57.1% | 45.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 5.3 | 688 | 12,219 | 22.2% | 64.7% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 4.4 | 915 | 12,514 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 5.8 | 808 | 10,982 | 46.7% | 62.5% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 6.4 | 905 | 13,528 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 22 | 6.2 | 841 | 13,308 | 33.3% | 23.1% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 5.4 | 1,018 | 15,447 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 22.22% | 18 | 5.0 | 720 | 12,243 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.5 | 863 | 10,841 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 4.4 | 784 | 11,530 | 83.3% | 33.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 6.2 | 925 | 14,331 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 5.1 | 862 | 14,883 | 80.0% | 83.3% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 6.7 | 1,005 | 13,740 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.0 | 639 | 10,802 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 823 | 12,174 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 1,013 | 13,112 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 708 | 12,550 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.2 | 701 | 8,964 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 2.3 | 885 | 12,819 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.3 | 843 | 14,507 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.3 | 797 | 13,719 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.5 | 955 | 12,128 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.0 | 973 | 14,314 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.7 | 822 | 8,922 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 680 | 11,362 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.5 | 1,218 | 13,927 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.2 | 959 | 11,619 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 5.6 | 819 | 11,975 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.5 | 420 | 9,412 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 680 | 11,965 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 743 | 12,453 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 2.1 | 609 | 12,069 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.8 | 817 | 11,164 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.0 | 637 | 10,347 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.2 | 1,022 | 14,810 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 847 | 12,845 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 895 | 13,794 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.2 | 1,119 | 13,760 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 789 | 11,888 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 1,112 | 17,856 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.1 | 705 | 13,205 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 957 | 16,837 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 1,229 | 13,742 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，瘟疫之源对残月之肃表现如何？
瘟疫之源以57.1%的胜率赢得瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃的对决，而残月之肃为42.9%，相差14.3个百分点。该数据基于26.7版本的63场近期排位赛。
在前期，瘟疫之源对残月之肃表现如何？
在前期，瘟疫之源对残月之肃占有优势，胜率为63.3%对36.7%。瘟疫之源玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，瘟疫之源对残月之肃表现如何？
在后期，瘟疫之源以51.5%对48.5%的胜率主导瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃的对决。瘟疫之源在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃的对决？
瘟疫之源在英雄联盟26.7版本中以57.1%的胜率赢得对残月之肃的对决。14.3个百分点的优势意味着根据63场分析的比赛，瘟疫之源在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗残月之肃的最佳瘟疫之源出装是什么？
对抗残月之肃的最佳瘟疫之源出装包括optimized core items。 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗残月之肃的最佳瘟疫之源符文是什么？
对抗残月之肃的最佳瘟疫之源符文使用精密主系和巫术副系。This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the 瘟疫之源 vs 残月之肃 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
瘟疫之源克制残月之肃吗？
是的，瘟疫之源对残月之肃有利，胜率为57.1%。根据当前26.7版本数据，瘟疫之源在线上strongly counters残月之肃。
如何用瘟疫之源对战残月之肃？
当瘟疫之源对战残月之肃时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。