
邪恶小法师对阵 不羁之悦
邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦在LoL版本26.14中是a decisive对线。不羁之悦以60.0%胜率(+20.0%)击败邪恶小法师,基于5场比赛。不羁之悦 wins the early laning phase while 邪恶小法师 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦对线的最佳邪恶小法师出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
邪恶小法师对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看邪恶小法师对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文,以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦对线谁赢?

邪恶小法师对战不羁之悦对决摘要
邪恶小法师对战不羁之悦在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据5场近期比赛的分析,不羁之悦以60.0%的胜率获胜,相比邪恶小法师的40.0%,给予不羁之悦 20.0个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用:不羁之悦控制早期对线阶段,但邪恶小法师在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——不羁之悦需要在邪恶小法师达到强势期之前压制优势,而邪恶小法师应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面,邪恶小法师领先0.6s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 不羁之悦在这场对决中有强大优势。邪恶小法师玩家应该防守性地游戏,优先在塔下安全发育,并寻找由打野压力或不羁之悦过度前压创造的机会。避免长时间换血,等待团战,那里的位置和协调更重要。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
邪恶小法师对战不羁之悦对线阶段分析
不羁之悦在对线阶段对阵邪恶小法师时更有优势,赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。不羁之悦在补刀, 金币收入 和 续航方面有优势,使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Early Game vs Late Game
不羁之悦以令人印象深刻的100.0%胜率主导前期(前15分钟)——领先邪恶小法师 100.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着不羁之悦可以从1级开始决定线上节奏,控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
后期(25分钟以上)同样平衡,邪恶小法师以50.0%胜率——仅领先不羁之悦 0.0点。团战执行和宏观游戏决定这一阶段的胜者,而非英雄对决优势。
力量动态随着游戏进行而变化——不羁之悦早期有优势,但邪恶小法师逐渐接管。然而,差距足够小,任何英雄都可以在任何阶段用正确的操作获胜。专注于在有优势时利用它们,而不是等待特定的游戏阶段。
Best 邪恶小法师 Runes Against 不羁之悦
启迪和巫术符文设置给邪恶小法师在这场困难对决中与不羁之悦竞争的最佳工具,用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.14版本邪恶小法师对线数据。下表显示邪恶小法师对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析,包括邪恶小法师最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.31% | 207 | 6.6 | 886 | 12,494 | 48.7% | 48.1% | |
| 53.19% | 188 | 5.7 | 835 | 11,603 | 42.6% | 59.2% | |
| 55.08% | 187 | 6.6 | 922 | 12,110 | 56.8% | 54.0% | |
| 50.00% | 176 | 6.2 | 885 | 11,410 | 44.1% | 53.7% | |
| 55.17% | 174 | 6.5 | 849 | 11,633 | 57.4% | 53.8% | |
| 53.85% | 143 | 5.8 | 1,048 | 11,759 | 46.5% | 58.8% | |
| 48.89% | 135 | 6.1 | 920 | 11,964 | 41.2% | 53.6% | |
| 62.60% | 123 | 6.3 | 994 | 12,319 | 57.5% | 65.8% | |
| 64.04% | 114 | 6.3 | 905 | 11,770 | 62.5% | 65.2% | |
| 44.25% | 113 | 6.3 | 926 | 12,675 | 41.0% | 46.0% | |
| 42.99% | 107 | 6.2 | 964 | 11,626 | 37.8% | 46.8% | |
| 48.11% | 106 | 6.4 | 840 | 11,601 | 51.3% | 46.3% | |
| 53.00% | 100 | 6.3 | 867 | 11,926 | 51.5% | 53.7% | |
| 57.58% | 99 | 6.1 | 975 | 13,340 | 43.3% | 63.8% | |
| 54.64% | 97 | 6.5 | 956 | 12,442 | 51.4% | 56.5% | |
| 57.29% | 96 | 6.3 | 976 | 12,591 | 61.8% | 54.8% | |
| 45.56% | 90 | 6.7 | 892 | 12,181 | 57.5% | 36.0% | |
| 48.86% | 88 | 6.6 | 901 | 13,107 | 48.4% | 49.1% | |
| 48.24% | 85 | 6.4 | 935 | 13,755 | 52.0% | 46.7% | |
| 52.56% | 78 | 6.6 | 854 | 11,853 | 59.3% | 49.0% | |
| 52.24% | 67 | 6.4 | 917 | 11,506 | 54.8% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 4.4 | 685 | 10,523 | 31.8% | 59.5% | |
| 46.03% | 63 | 6.6 | 982 | 12,132 | 42.1% | 47.7% | |
| 53.23% | 62 | 6.4 | 950 | 13,711 | 42.9% | 58.5% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 6.0 | 838 | 11,352 | 38.1% | 46.1% | |
| 44.07% | 59 | 5.2 | 864 | 12,485 | 35.3% | 47.6% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 6.0 | 738 | 10,421 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 7.0 | 928 | 12,369 | 41.7% | 54.5% | |
| 34.55% | 55 | 6.4 | 858 | 11,384 | 32.0% | 36.7% | |
| 40.38% | 52 | 6.7 | 967 | 12,244 | 52.9% | 34.3% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 6.5 | 954 | 13,015 | 57.9% | 60.6% | |
| 60.78% | 51 | 6.3 | 894 | 14,155 | 63.2% | 59.4% | |
| 64.00% | 50 | 6.6 | 923 | 12,721 | 50.0% | 76.9% | |
| 58.00% | 50 | 6.8 | 1,080 | 12,998 | 47.6% | 65.5% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 6.2 | 907 | 12,714 | 50.0% | 39.4% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 6.4 | 835 | 11,887 | 47.1% | 59.4% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 6.5 | 966 | 12,182 | 71.4% | 48.1% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 6.8 | 832 | 12,440 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 63.04% | 46 | 6.9 | 975 | 11,086 | 47.6% | 76.0% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 6.3 | 1,150 | 12,527 | 53.3% | 56.7% | |
| 68.29% | 41 | 6.6 | 979 | 13,644 | 64.3% | 70.4% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 6.7 | 946 | 13,979 | 71.4% | 40.7% | |
| 41.03% | 39 | 5.0 | 780 | 11,608 | 47.1% | 36.4% | |
| 57.89% | 38 | 6.6 | 954 | 14,263 | 42.9% | 61.3% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 6.7 | 924 | 12,955 | 57.1% | 54.2% | |
| 65.79% | 38 | 6.6 | 910 | 12,322 | 61.5% | 68.0% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.7 | 733 | 10,032 | 61.1% | 41.2% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 6.7 | 892 | 12,271 | 71.4% | 47.6% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.4 | 918 | 12,994 | 54.5% | 56.5% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 6.1 | 932 | 10,928 | 42.9% | 70.0% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 6.5 | 871 | 10,570 | 43.8% | 35.3% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 5.4 | 880 | 12,749 | 44.4% | 54.5% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 4.8 | 736 | 10,875 | 40.0% | 47.6% | |
| 34.48% | 29 | 6.3 | 772 | 13,118 | 33.3% | 35.0% | |
| 71.43% | 28 | 6.9 | 999 | 14,147 | 81.8% | 64.7% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 6.4 | 929 | 12,639 | 60.0% | 44.4% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 7.1 | 1,042 | 13,152 | 72.7% | 68.8% | |
| 80.77% | 26 | 6.3 | 859 | 11,548 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 6.5 | 975 | 12,549 | 55.6% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 7.1 | 1,031 | 13,420 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 4.9 | 1,077 | 12,291 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 6.4 | 905 | 11,531 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 3.1 | 826 | 12,943 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.4 | 932 | 11,202 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 4.8 | 968 | 11,080 | 50.0% | 46.1% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 837 | 11,692 | 14.3% | 46.1% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 4.0 | 687 | 9,357 | 36.4% | 55.6% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 3.0 | 667 | 9,922 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 2.7 | 754 | 12,053 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 7.1 | 1,086 | 13,243 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 6.6 | 970 | 13,680 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.3 | 804 | 10,773 | 28.6% | 45.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.6 | 929 | 12,496 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 3.9 | 702 | 11,130 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.5 | 668 | 10,206 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.8 | 898 | 14,400 | 0.0% | 41.7% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.6 | 947 | 9,860 | 85.7% | 28.6% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.5 | 1,030 | 14,259 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 7.2 | 947 | 13,905 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.8 | 1,084 | 12,985 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.3 | 1,062 | 14,444 | 0.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 2.9 | 807 | 11,587 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.7 | 797 | 11,759 | 0.0% | 62.5% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.7 | 651 | 8,619 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 3.4 | 648 | 13,163 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.7 | 1,079 | 10,604 | 42.9% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 966 | 12,112 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 1,424 | 14,755 | 33.3% | 85.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 843 | 10,847 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 7.5 | 1,173 | 13,786 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.8 | 827 | 8,649 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.7 | 574 | 7,112 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 3.1 | 717 | 9,753 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 9 | 5.9 | 920 | 10,814 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 845 | 11,149 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.2 | 1,095 | 14,461 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 1,176 | 12,835 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.0 | 771 | 12,283 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.9 | 640 | 9,670 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.6 | 694 | 11,895 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.3 | 922 | 9,698 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.6 | 631 | 7,893 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 1,019 | 7,175 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 759 | 9,368 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 1,066 | 10,896 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.8 | 744 | 13,954 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 899 | 11,857 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.4 | 721 | 10,191 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.8 | 1,030 | 12,046 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 943 | 11,673 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 547 | 9,319 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 1,305 | 15,225 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 989 | 13,414 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 723 | 12,192 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 1,112 | 15,401 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 860 | 13,688 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 884 | 11,368 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.0 | 846 | 11,385 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
夺取制胜优势
实时覆盖层、自动比赛追踪和专属工具——助你上分所需的一切,在 PC 上免费使用。
- 游戏内覆盖层
- 自动比赛追踪
- 桌面端专属工具
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中,邪恶小法师对不羁之悦表现如何?
不羁之悦以60.0%的胜率赢得邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦的对决,而邪恶小法师为40.0%,相差20.0个百分点。该数据基于26.14版本的5场近期排位赛。
在前期,邪恶小法师对不羁之悦表现如何?
在前期,不羁之悦对邪恶小法师占有优势,胜率为100.0%对0.0%。不羁之悦玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期,邪恶小法师对不羁之悦表现如何?
在后期,邪恶小法师以50.0%对50.0%的胜率主导邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦的对决。邪恶小法师在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦的对决?
不羁之悦在英雄联盟26.14版本中以60.0%的胜率赢得对邪恶小法师的对决。20.0个百分点的优势意味着根据5场分析的比赛,不羁之悦在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗不羁之悦的最佳邪恶小法师出装是什么?
对抗不羁之悦的最佳邪恶小法师出装包括optimized core items。 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗不羁之悦的最佳邪恶小法师符文是什么?
对抗不羁之悦的最佳邪恶小法师符文使用启迪主系和巫术副系。This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the 邪恶小法师 vs 不羁之悦 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
邪恶小法师克制不羁之悦吗?
不,邪恶小法师对抗不羁之悦时表现吃力,胜率仅为40.0%。不羁之悦在这个对决中占优。邪恶小法师玩家应该专注于安全补刀,避免长时间换血以减少不羁之悦的领先优势。
如何用邪恶小法师对战不羁之悦?
当邪恶小法师对战不羁之悦时,谨慎游戏并避开不羁之悦的强势期。Focus on safe farming — you outscale 不羁之悦 in the late game. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。
