远古巫灵对阵 时光守护者
远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者在LoL版本26.14中是a very close对线。远古巫灵以50.0%胜率(+0.0%)击败时光守护者，基于20场比赛。远古巫灵 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者对线的最佳远古巫灵出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
远古巫灵对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看远古巫灵对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者对线谁赢？
远古巫灵对战时光守护者对决摘要
远古巫灵对战时光守护者在英雄联盟排位赛中是本质上是五五开的对决。根据20场近期比赛的分析，远古巫灵以50.0%的胜率获胜，相比时光守护者的50.0%，给予远古巫灵 0.0个百分点的优势。 远古巫灵在前期和后期都有轻微优势，但差距足够小，个人技术和打野关注往往决定结果。时光守护者仍然可以通过精彩操作和团队协作找到机会。 最显著的统计差距在伤害输出方面，远古巫灵领先541 DMG/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 远古巫灵有统计优势，但差距足够接近，尊重时光守护者的优势很重要。在冷却时间有利时换血，追踪敌方打野，并朝着你最强的装备节点构建，将轻微优势转化为决定性领先。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
远古巫灵对战时光守护者对线阶段分析
远古巫灵在对线阶段对阵时光守护者时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。远古巫灵在补刀, 伤害, 金币收入 和 控制技能方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 远古巫灵 Build Against 时光守护者
法师之靴是对抗时光守护者的最佳鞋子选择，提供远古巫灵在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 远古巫灵对抗时光守护者表现最好的核心装备是卢登的回声, 影焰 和 视界专注。这一组合给远古巫灵提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在2场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗时光守护者的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为远古巫灵对战时光守护者对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
远古巫灵50.0%
时光守护者50.0%远古巫灵50.0%时光守护者50.0%前期（前15分钟）是远古巫灵和时光守护者之间的抛硬币，远古巫灵以微弱的50.0%胜率优势领先（+0.0%）。个人技术和打野位置在早期对线阶段比英雄优势更重要。
后期（25分钟以上）同样平衡，远古巫灵以50.0%胜率——仅领先时光守护者 0.0点。团战执行和宏观游戏决定这一阶段的胜者，而非英雄对决优势。
这场对决在游戏的每个阶段都非常平衡。远古巫灵和时光守护者都没有特定阶段的优势，使这成为一场纯粹的技术对决，个人操作、决策和团队协调决定结果。
Best 远古巫灵 Runes Against 时光守护者
启迪
巫术
启迪主系配巫术副系的组合帮助远古巫灵在这场激烈竞争的对决中最大化潜力，提供正确的进攻和防守工具组合来超越时光守护者。
英雄联盟26.14版本远古巫灵对线数据。下表显示远古巫灵对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括远古巫灵最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.75% | 187 | 3.7 | 930 | 11,446 | 61.9% | 55.6% | |
| 50.72% | 138 | 2.5 | 828 | 10,115 | 55.8% | 47.7% | |
| 56.44% | 101 | 6.5 | 1,052 | 12,103 | 65.6% | 52.2% | |
| 58.95% | 95 | 6.1 | 995 | 11,301 | 59.5% | 58.6% | |
| 56.98% | 86 | 4.8 | 1,019 | 12,029 | 58.8% | 55.8% | |
| 60.26% | 78 | 2.8 | 902 | 11,002 | 53.9% | 63.5% | |
| 51.43% | 70 | 2.1 | 840 | 9,712 | 46.4% | 54.8% | |
| 47.83% | 69 | 5.8 | 903 | 11,455 | 50.0% | 46.5% | |
| 51.52% | 66 | 6.5 | 1,034 | 12,435 | 68.0% | 41.5% | |
| 61.54% | 65 | 6.7 | 1,021 | 12,295 | 65.4% | 59.0% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 6.7 | 955 | 11,216 | 64.3% | 38.9% | |
| 55.56% | 63 | 5.8 | 1,047 | 11,805 | 58.3% | 53.9% | |
| 57.38% | 61 | 3.4 | 951 | 11,415 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 55.00% | 60 | 6.0 | 948 | 11,522 | 71.4% | 46.1% | |
| 55.00% | 60 | 6.0 | 1,063 | 11,980 | 57.7% | 52.9% | |
| 56.90% | 58 | 6.3 | 1,100 | 11,134 | 54.5% | 58.3% | |
| 40.35% | 57 | 2.0 | 784 | 9,972 | 47.8% | 35.3% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 5.9 | 936 | 10,287 | 57.1% | 31.4% | |
| 55.56% | 54 | 2.8 | 862 | 10,416 | 52.4% | 57.6% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 3.5 | 1,007 | 11,685 | 61.5% | 51.4% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 5.3 | 893 | 11,265 | 63.2% | 35.5% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 5.5 | 1,014 | 11,319 | 36.8% | 60.0% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 2.0 | 848 | 9,615 | 47.1% | 41.9% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 6.3 | 1,065 | 12,400 | 71.4% | 46.1% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 2.1 | 772 | 9,371 | 42.9% | 42.3% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 2.1 | 778 | 9,136 | 52.2% | 50.0% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 2.1 | 693 | 9,022 | 44.4% | 65.2% | |
| 42.11% | 38 | 2.4 | 837 | 10,693 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 6.6 | 1,110 | 12,666 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 61.11% | 36 | 5.4 | 1,101 | 12,573 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.0 | 1,031 | 12,373 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 2.3 | 998 | 10,833 | 45.5% | 52.2% | |
| 70.59% | 34 | 6.4 | 1,073 | 12,481 | 62.5% | 73.1% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 6.6 | 970 | 11,971 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 3.0 | 1,021 | 10,624 | 61.5% | 55.0% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 5.6 | 902 | 11,835 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 6.6 | 1,161 | 11,353 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 2.0 | 811 | 9,196 | 45.5% | 47.4% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 3.0 | 896 | 11,059 | 40.0% | 53.3% | |
| 48.28% | 29 | 5.7 | 1,137 | 12,124 | 61.5% | 37.5% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 5.7 | 1,056 | 12,695 | 57.1% | 35.0% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 2.1 | 789 | 9,740 | 55.6% | 27.8% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 6.5 | 1,048 | 10,892 | 61.5% | 35.7% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 2.2 | 926 | 11,639 | 62.5% | 63.2% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 6.1 | 1,238 | 13,158 | 60.0% | 68.2% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 2.2 | 780 | 9,231 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 2.0 | 786 | 9,938 | 10.0% | 43.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.4 | 1,075 | 11,747 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.9 | 875 | 10,719 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 2.4 | 786 | 9,160 | 54.5% | 35.7% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 6.6 | 954 | 12,055 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 6.0 | 1,074 | 12,974 | 80.0% | 63.2% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.0 | 1,022 | 11,397 | 54.5% | 41.7% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 6.2 | 968 | 10,725 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.4 | 1,226 | 13,670 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 3.2 | 955 | 11,768 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 6.4 | 1,145 | 10,429 | 22.2% | 41.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 5.4 | 1,037 | 11,073 | 57.1% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 4.3 | 1,004 | 12,850 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.3 | 1,111 | 13,781 | 75.0% | 53.9% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 5.9 | 960 | 9,961 | 22.2% | 41.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.7 | 1,137 | 13,521 | 50.0% | 58.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.6 | 909 | 10,556 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 1.8 | 775 | 9,650 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.9 | 1,056 | 13,553 | 40.0% | 64.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.4 | 1,019 | 13,370 | 85.7% | 45.5% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 2.0 | 804 | 8,787 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.2 | 892 | 11,036 | 55.6% | 33.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 2.1 | 612 | 8,623 | 62.5% | 44.4% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 3.5 | 894 | 12,074 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 747 | 8,420 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 2.3 | 889 | 10,599 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.4 | 1,175 | 13,827 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 6.5 | 1,125 | 11,398 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.1 | 1,080 | 14,026 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.8 | 886 | 9,556 | 71.4% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.4 | 989 | 12,658 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 2.1 | 985 | 9,551 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.5 | 984 | 10,898 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 1,088 | 8,865 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 90.91% | 11 | 6.3 | 1,149 | 12,328 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 5.8 | 1,006 | 11,670 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.2 | 1,091 | 11,152 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 863 | 9,562 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 967 | 12,630 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.3 | 1,043 | 14,696 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 7.1 | 1,077 | 10,202 | 40.0% | 25.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.5 | 1,078 | 12,021 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.5 | 741 | 8,771 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 778 | 9,316 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 955 | 13,190 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 848 | 8,614 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.0 | 807 | 10,297 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 959 | 9,684 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.0 | 1,112 | 9,574 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.5 | 705 | 8,514 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.9 | 994 | 8,527 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 1,101 | 14,236 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 7.3 | 879 | 12,401 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.8 | 851 | 8,649 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 829 | 12,884 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.2 | 795 | 7,158 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.2 | 1,090 | 15,583 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.8 | 896 | 11,242 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 843 | 11,012 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
夺取制胜优势
实时覆盖层、自动比赛追踪和专属工具——助你上分所需的一切，在 PC 上免费使用。
- 游戏内覆盖层
- 自动比赛追踪
- 桌面端专属工具
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，远古巫灵对时光守护者表现如何？
远古巫灵以50.0%的胜率赢得远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者的对决，而时光守护者为50.0%，相差0.0个百分点。该数据基于26.14版本的20场近期排位赛。
在前期，远古巫灵对时光守护者表现如何？
在前期，远古巫灵对时光守护者占有优势，胜率为50.0%对50.0%。远古巫灵玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，远古巫灵对时光守护者表现如何？
在后期，远古巫灵以50.0%对50.0%的胜率主导远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者的对决。远古巫灵在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者的对决？
远古巫灵在英雄联盟26.14版本中以50.0%的胜率赢得对时光守护者的对决。0.0个百分点的优势意味着根据20场分析的比赛，远古巫灵在这个线上对决中slightly占优。
对抗时光守护者的最佳远古巫灵出装是什么？
对抗时光守护者的最佳远古巫灵出装包括卢登的回声, 影焰, 视界专注 with 法师之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗时光守护者的最佳远古巫灵符文是什么？
对抗时光守护者的最佳远古巫灵符文使用启迪主系和巫术副系。This rune setup achieves a 66.7% win rate in the 远古巫灵 vs 时光守护者 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
远古巫灵克制时光守护者吗？
是的，远古巫灵对时光守护者有利，胜率为50.0%。根据当前26.14版本数据，远古巫灵在线上slightly edges out时光守护者。
如何用远古巫灵对战时光守护者？
当远古巫灵对战时光守护者时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。