
Jarvan IVvs Brand
Jarvan IV vs Brand is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Brand wins with a 68.4% win rate (+36.8%) over Jarvan IV based on 19 games. Brand holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Jarvan IV build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup.
Jarvan IV Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Jarvan IV performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Jarvan IV vs Brand Matchup?

Jarvan IV vs Brand Matchup Summary
The Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 19 recent matches analyzed, Brand wins with a 68.4% win rate compared to Jarvan IV's 31.6%, giving Brand a 36.8 percentage point advantage. Brand dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Jarvan IV players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Jarvan IV leads by 880 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Brand has a strong advantage in this matchup. Jarvan IV players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Brand overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Jarvan IV vs Brand Laning Phase Breakdown
Brand is favored during the laning phase against Jarvan IV, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Brand holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Jarvan IV Build Against Brand
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Brand, providing the mobility and stats Jarvan IV needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Jarvan IV against Brand are Sundered Sky, Frozen Heart and Spirit Visage. This combination gives Jarvan IV an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Brand dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 85.7% win rate — a 71.4 percentage point lead over Jarvan IV. This lopsided early game means Brand can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Brand is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 58.3% win rate — 16.7 points above Jarvan IV. Extended games heavily favor Brand, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Brand holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Jarvan IV players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Jarvan IV Runes Against Brand
The Precision and Inspiration rune setup gives Jarvan IV the best tools to compete against Brand in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Jarvan IV matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Jarvan IV's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Jarvan IV build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.23% | 155 | 0.9 | 561 | 11,853 | 42.7% | 43.8% | |
| 51.37% | 146 | 1.0 | 661 | 13,084 | 58.3% | 46.5% | |
| 51.03% | 145 | 1.0 | 624 | 12,449 | 57.4% | 46.4% | |
| 50.34% | 145 | 0.9 | 553 | 11,910 | 52.2% | 48.7% | |
| 51.11% | 135 | 0.9 | 627 | 12,158 | 51.5% | 50.8% | |
| 40.91% | 132 | 1.0 | 547 | 12,017 | 42.4% | 39.4% | |
| 48.28% | 116 | 0.9 | 598 | 11,638 | 50.0% | 46.5% | |
| 51.89% | 106 | 0.9 | 595 | 12,119 | 58.0% | 46.4% | |
| 55.24% | 105 | 1.1 | 571 | 12,869 | 60.5% | 51.6% | |
| 48.54% | 103 | 0.9 | 610 | 12,432 | 46.9% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 100 | 1.0 | 587 | 12,597 | 38.5% | 41.0% | |
| 45.21% | 73 | 1.1 | 671 | 13,069 | 36.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 72 | 1.0 | 608 | 12,485 | 58.8% | 52.6% | |
| 47.06% | 68 | 1.0 | 682 | 12,658 | 46.1% | 47.6% | |
| 52.24% | 67 | 0.9 | 591 | 11,860 | 60.0% | 46.0% | |
| 47.69% | 65 | 0.9 | 600 | 12,602 | 58.6% | 38.9% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 0.9 | 566 | 11,644 | 59.0% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 62 | 0.9 | 613 | 12,500 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 0.9 | 598 | 11,134 | 48.3% | 44.0% | |
| 37.04% | 54 | 1.0 | 596 | 11,437 | 33.3% | 41.7% | |
| 50.94% | 53 | 1.0 | 644 | 11,980 | 42.9% | 60.0% | |
| 42.31% | 52 | 0.9 | 601 | 12,047 | 29.2% | 53.6% | |
| 51.06% | 47 | 1.0 | 619 | 12,538 | 45.0% | 55.6% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 0.9 | 653 | 13,561 | 63.2% | 46.1% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 0.8 | 588 | 12,475 | 55.0% | 36.0% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 1.0 | 599 | 13,098 | 35.7% | 50.0% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 0.9 | 530 | 10,839 | 53.9% | 64.7% | |
| 70.00% | 40 | 1.0 | 633 | 12,826 | 64.7% | 73.9% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 0.9 | 550 | 12,866 | 46.7% | 52.4% | |
| 32.35% | 34 | 0.9 | 591 | 11,865 | 17.6% | 47.1% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 1.1 | 618 | 12,330 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.1 | 616 | 12,013 | 57.1% | 56.3% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 0.8 | 642 | 12,418 | 30.8% | 53.3% | |
| 67.86% | 28 | 1.2 | 667 | 12,682 | 81.8% | 58.8% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 0.9 | 618 | 11,392 | 60.0% | 30.8% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 1.1 | 560 | 12,612 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 1.1 | 532 | 12,508 | 25.0% | 41.7% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 510 | 9,921 | 54.5% | 33.3% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.5 | 721 | 13,196 | 75.0% | 27.3% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.0 | 728 | 13,038 | 55.6% | 60.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 1.8 | 646 | 12,332 | 14.3% | 41.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.0 | 530 | 12,217 | 37.5% | 45.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.1 | 544 | 11,071 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.0 | 566 | 11,465 | 57.1% | 27.3% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 2.3 | 591 | 11,388 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 0.9 | 595 | 11,996 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 1.2 | 483 | 11,241 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 0.9 | 592 | 12,234 | 37.5% | 66.7% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.6 | 713 | 12,033 | 62.5% | 22.2% | |
| 75.00% | 16 | 1.3 | 642 | 14,103 | 50.0% | 83.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 540 | 11,111 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.2 | 587 | 9,785 | 42.9% | 85.7% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.2 | 557 | 11,416 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.7 | 751 | 14,343 | 60.0% | 62.5% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.5 | 620 | 12,403 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 3.1 | 727 | 11,392 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 0.9 | 666 | 11,952 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.5 | 525 | 8,377 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.0 | 572 | 13,713 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.5 | 782 | 13,672 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 0.9 | 587 | 12,969 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 625 | 11,509 | 50.0% | 37.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 2.5 | 667 | 13,515 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 536 | 8,170 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 658 | 14,451 | 100.0% | 55.6% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 0.6 | 434 | 11,871 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 577 | 12,492 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 587 | 12,112 | 75.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.5 | 545 | 10,688 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 100.00% | 9 | 1.8 | 639 | 12,076 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 0.8 | 658 | 10,128 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.8 | 654 | 12,619 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 642 | 11,098 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.2 | 602 | 11,206 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.3 | 554 | 8,499 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.8 | 422 | 10,481 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.1 | 520 | 11,395 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 814 | 12,992 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 726 | 10,509 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 1.1 | 722 | 9,667 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 579 | 13,760 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 0.9 | 537 | 10,184 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.1 | 460 | 11,095 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.8 | 474 | 10,739 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.7 | 538 | 9,348 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 642 | 8,766 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 580 | 12,238 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.5 | 554 | 12,796 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.7 | 603 | 10,765 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 729 | 11,834 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 667 | 12,825 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 652 | 15,022 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 598 | 10,243 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 676 | 15,144 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Jarvan IV vs Brand - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Jarvan IV do against Brand in League of Legends?
Brand wins the Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup with a 68.4% win rate compared to Jarvan IV's 31.6%, a 36.8 percentage point difference. This data is based on 19 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Jarvan IV do against Brand in the early game?
In the early game, Brand has the advantage against Jarvan IV with a 85.7% win rate versus 14.3%. Brand players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Jarvan IV do against Brand in the late game?
In the late game, Brand takes over the Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup with a 58.3% win rate compared to 41.7%. Brand scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup?
Brand wins the matchup against Jarvan IV with a 68.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 36.8 percentage point advantage means Brand is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 19 games analyzed.
What is the best Jarvan IV build against Brand?
The best Jarvan IV build against Brand includes Sundered Sky, Frozen Heart, Spirit Visage with Plated Steelcaps. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Jarvan IV runes against Brand?
The best Jarvan IV runes against Brand use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Jarvan IV vs Brand matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Jarvan IV counter Brand?
No, Jarvan IV struggles against Brand with only a 31.6% win rate. Brand has the advantage in this matchup. Jarvan IV players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Brand's lead.
How do I play Jarvan IV against Brand?
When playing Jarvan IV against Brand, play cautiously and avoid Brand's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Brand has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
