
Lee Sinvs Olaf
Lee Sin vs Olaf is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Olaf wins with a 54.5% win rate (+9.1%) over Lee Sin based on 11 games. Lee Sin wins the early laning phase while Olaf scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Lee Sin build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup.
Lee Sin Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Lee Sin performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Lee Sin vs Olaf Matchup?

Lee Sin vs Olaf Matchup Summary
The Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 11 recent matches analyzed, Olaf wins with a 54.5% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 45.5%, giving Olaf a 9.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Lee Sin controls the early laning stage, but Olaf outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Lee Sin needs to press advantages before Olaf reaches their power spikes, while Olaf should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Olaf leads by 264 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Olaf has a strong advantage in this matchup. Lee Sin players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Olaf overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Lee Sin vs Olaf Laning Phase Breakdown
Olaf is favored during the laning phase against Lee Sin, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Olaf holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Lee Sin Build Against Olaf
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Olaf, providing the mobility and stats Lee Sin needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Lee Sin against Olaf are Eclipse, Chempunk Chainsword and Death's Dance. This combination gives Lee Sin an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Olaf. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Lee Sin and Olaf, with Lee Sin holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Olaf is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 60.0% win rate — 20.0 points above Lee Sin. Extended games heavily favor Olaf, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Lee Sin has the edge early, but Olaf gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Lee Sin Runes Against Olaf
The Precision and Inspiration rune setup gives Lee Sin the best tools to compete against Olaf in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Lee Sin matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Lee Sin's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Lee Sin build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.92% | 274 | 0.9 | 651 | 12,833 | 56.5% | 49.6% | |
| 55.00% | 200 | 0.9 | 709 | 12,778 | 57.8% | 52.0% | |
| 46.03% | 189 | 0.8 | 621 | 12,657 | 46.2% | 45.8% | |
| 44.81% | 154 | 1.0 | 659 | 12,944 | 47.3% | 42.5% | |
| 49.34% | 153 | 0.9 | 660 | 12,780 | 47.8% | 50.6% | |
| 47.10% | 138 | 0.8 | 684 | 12,885 | 44.8% | 49.3% | |
| 53.44% | 131 | 0.9 | 692 | 12,827 | 56.7% | 50.7% | |
| 51.61% | 125 | 1.0 | 715 | 12,963 | 39.0% | 63.1% | |
| 46.77% | 124 | 1.0 | 659 | 12,452 | 59.3% | 35.4% | |
| 49.18% | 123 | 1.1 | 691 | 12,901 | 51.0% | 47.9% | |
| 54.17% | 120 | 0.8 | 679 | 12,186 | 52.9% | 55.8% | |
| 48.28% | 117 | 0.9 | 629 | 12,935 | 46.9% | 49.3% | |
| 39.82% | 113 | 1.1 | 720 | 12,514 | 33.9% | 47.1% | |
| 54.46% | 112 | 1.2 | 773 | 12,652 | 57.4% | 51.7% | |
| 45.05% | 111 | 0.9 | 649 | 12,672 | 46.5% | 43.4% | |
| 48.54% | 103 | 1.0 | 685 | 12,522 | 47.2% | 50.0% | |
| 51.55% | 97 | 1.0 | 674 | 13,109 | 59.6% | 44.0% | |
| 42.71% | 96 | 0.8 | 676 | 12,771 | 47.7% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 92 | 0.9 | 651 | 13,107 | 57.6% | 45.8% | |
| 43.68% | 87 | 0.9 | 613 | 11,899 | 43.9% | 43.5% | |
| 43.37% | 84 | 0.8 | 688 | 11,996 | 34.1% | 53.9% | |
| 47.56% | 82 | 1.0 | 645 | 12,033 | 47.5% | 47.6% | |
| 43.04% | 81 | 0.8 | 640 | 12,054 | 46.7% | 38.2% | |
| 38.46% | 79 | 0.9 | 678 | 12,972 | 34.4% | 41.3% | |
| 44.93% | 70 | 0.9 | 731 | 12,774 | 42.9% | 47.1% | |
| 50.00% | 70 | 1.0 | 662 | 12,648 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.65% | 68 | 1.0 | 665 | 11,326 | 44.2% | 40.0% | |
| 44.62% | 65 | 1.0 | 724 | 12,308 | 53.1% | 36.4% | |
| 39.06% | 64 | 0.8 | 659 | 12,399 | 38.7% | 39.4% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 1.4 | 615 | 12,361 | 52.9% | 44.8% | |
| 37.93% | 58 | 0.9 | 646 | 11,478 | 39.4% | 36.0% | |
| 36.84% | 57 | 1.9 | 582 | 11,458 | 51.7% | 21.4% | |
| 38.89% | 55 | 0.9 | 602 | 13,005 | 52.9% | 32.4% | |
| 41.82% | 55 | 0.8 | 639 | 11,991 | 51.6% | 29.2% | |
| 41.82% | 55 | 0.9 | 732 | 13,451 | 21.1% | 52.8% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 0.8 | 609 | 11,883 | 39.1% | 51.9% | |
| 37.50% | 48 | 0.9 | 665 | 12,383 | 32.0% | 43.5% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 1.0 | 634 | 12,831 | 45.5% | 64.0% | |
| 54.35% | 46 | 1.6 | 724 | 12,699 | 57.9% | 51.9% | |
| 48.89% | 45 | 1.3 | 711 | 13,142 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 43.18% | 44 | 1.2 | 639 | 11,663 | 44.0% | 42.1% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 1.3 | 705 | 12,433 | 50.0% | 59.1% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 1.1 | 737 | 13,792 | 43.8% | 59.1% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 0.8 | 701 | 12,685 | 46.7% | 63.6% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 0.7 | 618 | 11,795 | 53.3% | 60.0% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 1.0 | 665 | 13,194 | 62.5% | 36.8% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 1.2 | 669 | 12,283 | 69.2% | 42.9% | |
| 37.50% | 33 | 0.8 | 616 | 13,099 | 46.7% | 29.4% | |
| 53.33% | 31 | 1.4 | 739 | 12,728 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 0.9 | 603 | 13,014 | 66.7% | 43.8% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 0.8 | 715 | 13,211 | 69.2% | 52.9% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.5 | 654 | 12,890 | 45.5% | 47.1% | |
| 22.22% | 27 | 0.8 | 679 | 11,978 | 25.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 0.9 | 669 | 12,761 | 46.1% | 53.9% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.3 | 591 | 10,673 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 29.17% | 24 | 1.6 | 730 | 13,109 | 50.0% | 18.8% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.6 | 642 | 10,837 | 83.3% | 36.4% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 1.5 | 638 | 11,633 | 46.1% | 22.2% | |
| 36.36% | 22 | 2.1 | 726 | 12,736 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 38.10% | 22 | 1.4 | 777 | 14,168 | 50.0% | 27.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.1 | 629 | 12,719 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.1 | 728 | 14,308 | 87.5% | 18.2% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.6 | 708 | 12,729 | 30.0% | 55.6% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 1.6 | 635 | 11,665 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 0.8 | 785 | 13,323 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.2 | 675 | 13,063 | 66.7% | 54.5% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.7 | 691 | 11,064 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.0 | 875 | 12,382 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 4.6 | 749 | 11,619 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.5 | 728 | 11,345 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.3 | 606 | 11,310 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.7 | 775 | 12,832 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.0 | 538 | 12,027 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 556 | 9,401 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.3 | 1,065 | 15,291 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 719 | 13,929 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 12.50% | 9 | 1.8 | 574 | 9,685 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.1 | 756 | 13,591 | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 4.5 | 819 | 12,517 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 669 | 13,258 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.1 | 791 | 13,552 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.0 | 566 | 9,419 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 598 | 10,327 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.0 | 622 | 11,572 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.9 | 578 | 10,477 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 598 | 11,693 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.5 | 1,038 | 15,006 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 4.8 | 565 | 7,617 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 727 | 12,034 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 787 | 10,235 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 823 | 14,849 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.1 | 577 | 9,926 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 546 | 10,251 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 640 | 9,927 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 623 | 11,907 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 1,005 | 14,371 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 677 | 12,099 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 676 | 10,596 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 650 | 12,998 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.5 | 989 | 14,613 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 650 | 10,252 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 652 | 10,146 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 913 | 15,045 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Lee Sin vs Olaf - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Lee Sin do against Olaf in League of Legends?
Olaf wins the Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup with a 54.5% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 11 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Lee Sin do against Olaf in the early game?
In the early game, Lee Sin has the advantage against Olaf with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Lee Sin players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Lee Sin do against Olaf in the late game?
In the late game, Olaf takes over the Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to 40.0%. Olaf scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup?
Olaf wins the matchup against Lee Sin with a 54.5% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 9.1 percentage point advantage means Olaf is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 11 games analyzed.
What is the best Lee Sin build against Olaf?
The best Lee Sin build against Olaf includes Eclipse, Chempunk Chainsword, Death's Dance with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Lee Sin runes against Olaf?
The best Lee Sin runes against Olaf use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Lee Sin vs Olaf matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Lee Sin counter Olaf?
No, Lee Sin struggles against Olaf with only a 45.5% win rate. Olaf has the advantage in this matchup. Lee Sin players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Olaf's lead.
How do I play Lee Sin against Olaf?
When playing Lee Sin against Olaf, play cautiously and avoid Olaf's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Olaf has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.