Shacovs Fizz
Shaco vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 60.9% win rate (+21.7%) over Shaco based on 23 games. Shaco wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Shaco vs Fizz matchup.
Shaco Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Shaco performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Fizz(39.1%)Who Wins the Shaco vs Fizz Matchup?
Shaco vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Shaco vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 23 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 60.9% win rate compared to Shaco's 39.1%, giving Fizz a 21.7 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Shaco controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Shaco needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Shaco leads by 0.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Shaco vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Shaco, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Shaco Build Against Fizz
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Shaco needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Shaco against Fizz are Luden's Echo, Shadowflame and Blackfire Torch. This combination gives Shaco an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Shaco vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Shaco60.0%Fizz40.0%Shaco33.3%Fizz66.7%Shaco dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 60.0% win rate — a 20.0 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Shaco can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Shaco. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Shaco must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Fizz reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Fizz survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Shaco Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Precision
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Shaco the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Shaco matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Shaco's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Shaco build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.29% | 349 | 0.8 | 725 | 12,594 | 49.3% | 52.7% | |
| 47.08% | 291 | 0.8 | 753 | 12,535 | 34.8% | 54.8% | |
| 47.25% | 273 | 0.8 | 703 | 12,650 | 51.0% | 45.2% | |
| 50.00% | 246 | 0.8 | 706 | 12,585 | 48.4% | 51.0% | |
| 48.57% | 245 | 0.9 | 693 | 12,413 | 48.0% | 49.0% | |
| 44.21% | 233 | 0.8 | 684 | 12,474 | 41.0% | 45.8% | |
| 48.03% | 229 | 0.8 | 748 | 12,321 | 52.4% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 224 | 0.8 | 690 | 12,431 | 47.2% | 40.8% | |
| 54.68% | 203 | 0.8 | 721 | 12,753 | 52.3% | 56.5% | |
| 50.60% | 166 | 0.9 | 709 | 12,717 | 54.1% | 48.6% | |
| 46.95% | 164 | 0.9 | 808 | 13,211 | 38.2% | 51.4% | |
| 46.46% | 127 | 0.9 | 723 | 12,648 | 40.9% | 49.4% | |
| 36.89% | 122 | 0.8 | 727 | 12,744 | 36.7% | 37.0% | |
| 50.00% | 120 | 0.8 | 722 | 12,547 | 57.1% | 46.1% | |
| 46.02% | 113 | 1.0 | 710 | 11,962 | 38.6% | 50.7% | |
| 55.45% | 110 | 0.8 | 740 | 12,350 | 54.2% | 56.5% | |
| 35.85% | 106 | 1.4 | 669 | 9,778 | 28.9% | 41.0% | |
| 50.96% | 104 | 0.8 | 689 | 12,546 | 45.2% | 54.8% | |
| 55.34% | 103 | 1.0 | 673 | 12,785 | 56.8% | 54.5% | |
| 42.27% | 97 | 0.7 | 736 | 12,646 | 34.2% | 47.5% | |
| 45.26% | 95 | 0.9 | 692 | 12,541 | 40.0% | 48.3% | |
| 48.91% | 92 | 0.9 | 658 | 11,952 | 50.0% | 48.0% | |
| 59.34% | 91 | 0.8 | 683 | 12,356 | 71.4% | 51.8% | |
| 53.33% | 90 | 0.8 | 708 | 12,271 | 57.5% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 88 | 0.8 | 726 | 13,424 | 54.5% | 54.5% | |
| 58.62% | 87 | 1.0 | 739 | 12,424 | 53.9% | 60.7% | |
| 46.51% | 86 | 0.8 | 669 | 13,090 | 55.6% | 42.4% | |
| 50.00% | 82 | 1.4 | 747 | 9,997 | 57.1% | 46.3% | |
| 60.98% | 82 | 1.1 | 815 | 13,092 | 62.5% | 60.0% | |
| 48.72% | 78 | 0.9 | 689 | 11,807 | 47.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.56% | 78 | 1.4 | 687 | 9,585 | 48.4% | 55.3% | |
| 51.32% | 76 | 0.8 | 650 | 12,174 | 63.6% | 41.9% | |
| 54.67% | 75 | 1.0 | 740 | 12,750 | 50.0% | 56.9% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.5 | 760 | 10,319 | 39.3% | 47.8% | |
| 58.11% | 74 | 1.5 | 711 | 10,177 | 60.7% | 56.5% | |
| 57.75% | 71 | 1.0 | 669 | 12,863 | 61.5% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 70 | 1.8 | 724 | 12,106 | 70.0% | 42.0% | |
| 55.71% | 70 | 1.2 | 783 | 11,150 | 55.6% | 55.8% | |
| 64.71% | 68 | 0.9 | 724 | 12,730 | 66.7% | 63.6% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 0.8 | 712 | 12,476 | 46.4% | 71.8% | |
| 55.22% | 67 | 1.4 | 682 | 10,111 | 54.2% | 55.8% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 1.2 | 729 | 12,237 | 38.9% | 63.6% | |
| 54.84% | 62 | 1.4 | 807 | 12,459 | 63.2% | 51.2% | |
| 53.23% | 62 | 0.9 | 659 | 13,092 | 57.9% | 51.2% | |
| 55.74% | 61 | 1.4 | 752 | 10,894 | 62.5% | 51.4% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 1.5 | 677 | 9,164 | 43.3% | 50.0% | |
| 44.07% | 59 | 1.4 | 791 | 9,754 | 43.5% | 44.4% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 1.0 | 760 | 13,278 | 42.9% | 65.8% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 0.9 | 805 | 12,847 | 26.3% | 59.4% | |
| 42.00% | 50 | 1.5 | 859 | 12,003 | 38.1% | 44.8% | |
| 40.82% | 49 | 1.1 | 740 | 13,120 | 36.4% | 42.1% | |
| 48.98% | 49 | 1.5 | 734 | 11,385 | 54.5% | 47.4% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 0.9 | 769 | 13,413 | 50.0% | 48.1% | |
| 44.19% | 43 | 0.7 | 772 | 12,815 | 42.9% | 44.8% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 1.4 | 655 | 9,004 | 65.0% | 47.8% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 1.5 | 712 | 10,373 | 57.1% | 58.6% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.8 | 817 | 9,694 | 57.9% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 0.9 | 710 | 12,561 | 23.1% | 63.0% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 1.5 | 817 | 11,094 | 46.1% | 57.7% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 1.2 | 760 | 12,342 | 75.0% | 36.7% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 1.5 | 646 | 10,025 | 61.5% | 44.0% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 0.8 | 758 | 11,798 | 46.7% | 43.5% | |
| 32.43% | 37 | 1.3 | 720 | 12,549 | 20.0% | 40.9% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.7 | 709 | 10,167 | 53.3% | 35.0% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 0.9 | 777 | 12,199 | 62.5% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.3 | 617 | 9,519 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 0.8 | 678 | 11,963 | 28.6% | 52.9% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.9 | 787 | 12,385 | 66.7% | 52.4% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 1.3 | 783 | 11,790 | 72.7% | 42.1% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 0.9 | 821 | 13,877 | 42.9% | 59.1% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 1.3 | 689 | 12,495 | 76.9% | 43.8% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 1.7 | 756 | 11,727 | 54.5% | 38.9% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 1.4 | 538 | 9,522 | 42.9% | 35.7% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.5 | 729 | 10,043 | 45.5% | 41.2% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 2.2 | 755 | 10,917 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.5 | 672 | 9,721 | 45.5% | 62.5% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 1.4 | 774 | 9,959 | 80.0% | 52.9% | |
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.3 | 697 | 11,277 | 45.5% | 73.3% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.8 | 824 | 12,997 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 1.8 | 736 | 12,860 | 14.3% | 44.4% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 703 | 9,414 | 66.7% | 23.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.1 | 731 | 13,314 | 45.5% | 61.5% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.2 | 695 | 9,141 | 66.7% | 46.7% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 1.4 | 761 | 13,681 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.5 | 837 | 11,800 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.6 | 854 | 11,091 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.4 | 652 | 10,722 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 4.7 | 750 | 11,293 | 62.5% | 75.0% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 678 | 9,197 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 2.1 | 584 | 9,842 | 40.0% | 37.5% | |
| 83.33% | 18 | 1.3 | 922 | 12,400 | 66.7% | 86.7% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.5 | 662 | 9,409 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 2.9 | 887 | 12,076 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 0.7 | 682 | 13,926 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.3 | 708 | 9,690 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.0 | 823 | 12,901 | 25.0% | 45.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.0 | 827 | 12,213 | 80.0% | 37.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.8 | 636 | 11,395 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 0.8 | 636 | 13,091 | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.5 | 686 | 11,153 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.4 | 745 | 11,580 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.4 | 722 | 11,020 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 666 | 9,586 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 746 | 11,635 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 11.11% | 9 | 2.3 | 504 | 8,462 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 730 | 10,979 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 729 | 10,756 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 786 | 9,269 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.5 | 711 | 10,050 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 0.8 | 649 | 12,203 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.3 | 570 | 12,033 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 2.8 | 686 | 12,594 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.3 | 643 | 13,398 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 668 | 12,878 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 0.7 | 512 | 11,768 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.3 | 707 | 12,345 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.0 | 832 | 8,998 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 606 | 9,789 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 719 | 9,747 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.9 | 670 | 14,352 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.5 | 754 | 12,751 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 693 | 10,326 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 848 | 12,345 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 543 | 7,261 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 850 | 8,705 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 744 | 10,438 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Shaco vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Shaco do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Shaco vs Fizz matchup with a 60.9% win rate compared to Shaco's 39.1%, a 21.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 23 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Shaco do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Shaco has the advantage against Fizz with a 60.0% win rate versus 40.0%. Shaco players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Shaco do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Shaco vs Fizz matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Shaco vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Shaco with a 60.9% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 21.7 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 23 games analyzed.
What is the best Shaco build against Fizz?
The best Shaco build against Fizz includes Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Blackfire Torch with Crimson Lucidity. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Shaco runes against Fizz?
The best Shaco runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Shaco vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Shaco counter Fizz?
No, Shaco struggles against Fizz with only a 39.1% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Shaco players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Shaco against Fizz?
When playing Shaco against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.