Fizzvs Shaco
Fizz vs Shaco is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Fizz wins with a 55.6% win rate (+11.1%) over Shaco based on 19 games. Fizz wins the early laning phase while Shaco scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fizz vs Shaco matchup.
Fizz Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fizz performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Shaco(55.6%)Who Wins the Fizz vs Shaco Matchup?
Fizz vs Shaco Matchup Summary
The Fizz vs Shaco matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 19 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 55.6% win rate compared to Shaco's 44.4%, giving Fizz a 11.1 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Fizz controls the early laning stage, but Shaco outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Fizz needs to press advantages before Shaco reaches their power spikes, while Shaco should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Shaco leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz players can confidently pick into Shaco and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Shaco away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fizz vs Shaco Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Shaco, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fizz Build Against Shaco
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Shaco, providing the mobility and stats Fizz needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fizz against Shaco are Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth and Dusk and Dawn. This combination gives Fizz an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build has a 33.3% win rate across 3 games. While the overall matchup may be difficult, this item path gives Fizz the best chance to compete against Shaco. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fizz vs Shaco matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Fizz70.0%Shaco30.0%Fizz37.5%Shaco62.5%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 70.0% win rate — a 40.0 percentage point lead over Shaco. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Shaco is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 62.5% win rate — 25.0 points above Fizz. Extended games heavily favor Shaco, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Fizz must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Shaco reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Shaco survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Fizz Runes Against Shaco
Domination
Precision
Running Domination primary with Precision secondary allows Fizz to press their advantage against Shaco, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Fizz matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Fizz's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fizz build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.69% | 161 | 6.1 | 836 | 12,638 | 52.4% | 46.8% | |
| 58.60% | 157 | 6.0 | 831 | 12,412 | 60.3% | 57.0% | |
| 57.27% | 110 | 6.2 | 753 | 12,604 | 58.3% | 56.5% | |
| 39.42% | 104 | 5.9 | 835 | 12,289 | 47.2% | 31.4% | |
| 48.31% | 89 | 5.7 | 734 | 12,636 | 50.0% | 47.1% | |
| 64.04% | 89 | 5.8 | 914 | 13,301 | 57.5% | 69.4% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 5.9 | 909 | 12,215 | 51.2% | 45.6% | |
| 60.24% | 83 | 6.0 | 858 | 12,598 | 53.9% | 65.9% | |
| 62.20% | 82 | 6.1 | 878 | 13,344 | 62.9% | 61.7% | |
| 46.25% | 80 | 6.0 | 796 | 12,292 | 51.4% | 41.9% | |
| 57.33% | 75 | 6.1 | 859 | 13,747 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 5.4 | 733 | 12,182 | 51.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.05% | 73 | 5.8 | 746 | 11,998 | 57.5% | 45.5% | |
| 49.30% | 71 | 5.6 | 880 | 12,868 | 23.1% | 64.4% | |
| 64.29% | 70 | 6.3 | 707 | 11,852 | 60.6% | 67.6% | |
| 45.45% | 66 | 5.7 | 795 | 12,481 | 44.8% | 46.0% | |
| 40.00% | 65 | 5.6 | 862 | 12,739 | 51.4% | 26.7% | |
| 45.61% | 57 | 5.0 | 847 | 12,022 | 38.9% | 57.1% | |
| 50.88% | 57 | 6.2 | 905 | 13,750 | 60.0% | 46.0% | |
| 36.54% | 52 | 5.9 | 763 | 12,820 | 40.0% | 34.4% | |
| 42.86% | 49 | 4.9 | 822 | 13,427 | 42.1% | 43.3% | |
| 59.18% | 49 | 6.2 | 813 | 12,873 | 76.2% | 46.4% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 6.2 | 784 | 11,909 | 39.1% | 58.3% | |
| 41.30% | 46 | 6.5 | 809 | 12,543 | 45.5% | 37.5% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 6.0 | 784 | 12,939 | 65.0% | 52.0% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.6 | 687 | 13,318 | 44.4% | 60.9% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.4 | 782 | 12,484 | 42.9% | 63.2% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 6.0 | 821 | 12,728 | 40.0% | 52.0% | |
| 40.00% | 40 | 5.2 | 760 | 12,368 | 38.9% | 40.9% | |
| 37.84% | 37 | 5.7 | 896 | 13,270 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 6.2 | 796 | 11,833 | 52.6% | 75.0% | |
| 54.29% | 35 | 5.7 | 779 | 12,416 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 6.0 | 888 | 11,853 | 52.9% | 29.4% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 6.0 | 794 | 12,153 | 65.0% | 35.7% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 5.9 | 899 | 12,729 | 28.6% | 57.9% | |
| 39.39% | 33 | 1.3 | 687 | 12,673 | 47.6% | 25.0% | |
| 68.75% | 32 | 2.2 | 805 | 13,385 | 61.1% | 78.6% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.3 | 747 | 13,477 | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 6.2 | 953 | 11,905 | 28.6% | 58.8% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 6.1 | 896 | 12,717 | 54.5% | 31.6% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 6.2 | 837 | 13,142 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.5 | 768 | 13,153 | 58.3% | 37.5% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 5.8 | 850 | 12,556 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.5 | 723 | 12,405 | 70.0% | 43.8% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 804 | 13,686 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 768 | 13,104 | 46.7% | 30.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.8 | 902 | 13,049 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 5.6 | 797 | 13,698 | 44.4% | 71.4% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 2.2 | 764 | 11,177 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 6.0 | 848 | 12,000 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.0 | 751 | 11,385 | 61.5% | 37.5% | |
| 55.56% | 19 | 1.5 | 736 | 12,746 | 70.0% | 37.5% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.5 | 619 | 12,267 | 62.5% | 36.4% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.1 | 711 | 12,341 | 70.0% | 44.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.1 | 796 | 14,963 | 80.0% | 35.7% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 4.5 | 836 | 12,633 | 71.4% | 36.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.0 | 863 | 12,524 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 6.0 | 862 | 11,699 | 71.4% | 54.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 2.3 | 811 | 13,396 | 25.0% | 55.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.8 | 728 | 14,255 | 37.5% | 44.4% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 2.4 | 756 | 13,541 | 33.3% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.2 | 887 | 13,845 | 37.5% | 62.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 1.4 | 777 | 12,638 | 66.7% | 70.0% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 5.0 | 757 | 10,062 | 44.4% | 85.7% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.6 | 729 | 12,761 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.7 | 807 | 13,291 | 25.0% | 36.4% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 5.5 | 889 | 12,694 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.4 | 766 | 13,794 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.0 | 941 | 13,453 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.2 | 806 | 15,146 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 848 | 12,776 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 3.4 | 833 | 14,336 | 80.0% | 85.7% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.1 | 715 | 13,290 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.7 | 1,021 | 13,156 | 62.5% | 100.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.4 | 621 | 13,238 | 71.4% | 25.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.5 | 885 | 13,020 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.4 | 741 | 12,125 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 779 | 12,318 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 1.0 | 666 | 12,115 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.8 | 777 | 13,143 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.8 | 773 | 13,016 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.4 | 669 | 14,420 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.2 | 848 | 15,879 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.8 | 841 | 14,163 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.0 | 747 | 11,873 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.0 | 1,068 | 13,714 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 829 | 14,035 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.9 | 823 | 12,565 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 767 | 11,230 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.4 | 688 | 10,252 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 906 | 12,459 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 777 | 12,181 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.0 | 661 | 14,149 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 983 | 15,935 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.4 | 772 | 14,608 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.4 | 838 | 11,078 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.3 | 689 | 12,314 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 770 | 12,706 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 799 | 12,854 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 722 | 14,725 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.6 | 870 | 9,574 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 626 | 12,753 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 789 | 16,379 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 880 | 13,728 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 852 | 8,498 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 753 | 11,133 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 833 | 12,555 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 847 | 9,400 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fizz vs Shaco - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fizz do against Shaco in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Fizz vs Shaco matchup with a 55.6% win rate compared to Shaco's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. This data is based on 19 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Fizz do against Shaco in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Shaco with a 70.0% win rate versus 30.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fizz do against Shaco in the late game?
In the late game, Shaco takes over the Fizz vs Shaco matchup with a 62.5% win rate compared to 37.5%. Shaco scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fizz vs Shaco matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Shaco with a 55.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 11.1 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 19 games analyzed.
What is the best Fizz build against Shaco?
The best Fizz build against Shaco includes Zhonya's Hourglass, Nashor's Tooth, Dusk and Dawn with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 33.3% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fizz runes against Shaco?
The best Fizz runes against Shaco use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fizz vs Shaco matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fizz counter Shaco?
Yes, Fizz has a favorable matchup against Shaco with a 55.6% win rate. Fizz strongly counters Shaco in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Fizz against Shaco?
When playing Fizz against Shaco, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.