Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Breach's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Breach
40.0% WR
VS
Chamber
56.0% WR
Who Wins the Breach vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 25
40.0%
Win Rate
56.0%
1.36
Avg KDA
1.20
12.8
Avg Kills
14.8
14.8
Avg Deaths
14.8
125.6
DMG/Round
139.6
31.4%
HS %
27.5%
188
Combat Score
208
49.2%
Attack WR
47.7%
52.3%
Defense WR
50.8%
Breach vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 25 matches reveals that Breach holds a clear advantage over Chamber in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Chamber shows strength in one category, Breach's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.36Breach
1.20Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Breach and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.36 and 1.20 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
125.6Breach
139.6Chamber
Chamber outputs 139.6 average damage per round, edging out Breach's 125.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Chamber secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.2%Breach
47.7%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Breach at 49.2% and Chamber at 47.7% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.3%Breach
50.8%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Breach posting a 52.3% win rate and Chamber at 50.8%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Breach vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 25 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 56.0% of the time compared to Breach's 40.0%, a 16.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Breach consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Chamber has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Breach should never take isolated fights against Chamber and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Breach vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Breach edges out Chamber in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 25 matches analyzed, this Breach vs Chamber matchup remains contestable for both sides. Chamber shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Chamber's favor.
Avg KDA
1.36Breach
1.20Chamber
Breach holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.36 compared to Chamber's 1.20. While this 0.15 point difference indicates Breach tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Breach's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Chamber players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
12.8Breach
14.8Chamber
Chamber substantially outfrags Breach in this matchup, averaging 14.8 kills compared to 12.8 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Chamber faces Breach, the data clearly shows Chamber finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Breach players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Chamber in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.8Breach
14.8Chamber
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Breach (14.8 deaths/game) and Chamber (14.8 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
125.6Breach
139.6Chamber
Chamber significantly outdamages Breach in head-to-head encounters, posting 139.6 ADR versus 125.6. This 14.0 damage-per-round advantage means Chamber consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Breach players should avoid prolonged dueling with Chamber — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
31.4%Breach
27.5%Chamber
Breach demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Chamber: 31.4% versus 27.5%. This 3.9 percentage point gap in precision means Breach ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Chamber faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Breach vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Breach
49.2%
47.7%
Defense Side
Breach
52.3%
50.8%
Attack Side Breakdown
Breach demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Chamber in this matchup, converting 49.2% of attacking rounds versus 47.7%. While this 1.5 point edge gives Breach slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 25 competitive games suggests Breach's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Chamber teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.5% gap.
When taking entry duels, Breach holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Chamber players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Breach can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Breach has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 8 agents in Valorant. Breach's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Breach matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Breach's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Breach excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Breach's hardest matchup?
Breach's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Breach should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Breach have?
Breach has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 8 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Breach in difficult matchups?
When playing Breach in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Breach's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Breach's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Breach's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Breach's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Chamber should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.5 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Breach shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Chamber, winning 52.3% of defense rounds compared to 50.8%. This 1.5 percentage point edge suggests Breach's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Chamber players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Breach can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.5% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Chamber should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Breach demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Breach converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Chamber should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Breach when you can wait for teammates. Breach can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.5% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Chamber should be more conservative with eco aggression against Breach and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Breach can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Breach maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.2% attack win rate and 52.3% defense win rate. While Breach is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Chamber remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Breach vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Breach advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Breach and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Breach has a slight statistical edge, but Chamber is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Chamber, don't switch to Breach just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Breach) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Breach's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Breach's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Breach advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Breach vs Chamber matchup guide: Chamber leads with a 56.0% win rate, but Breach can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 25-match dataset into ranked wins.
