Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Breach's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Breach
35.7% WR
VS
Neon
64.3% WR
Who Wins the Breach vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 14
35.7%
Win Rate
64.3%
1.32
Avg KDA
1.15
13.0
Avg Kills
15.2
16.4
Avg Deaths
16.6
124.1
DMG/Round
130.9
25.4%
HS %
22.9%
181
Combat Score
203
46.2%
Attack WR
57.1%
42.9%
Defense WR
53.8%
Breach vs Neon Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 14 matches reveals that Neon holds a clear advantage over Breach in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Breach shows strength in one category, Neon's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.32Breach
1.15Neon
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Breach and Neon, with KDA ratios of 1.32 and 1.15 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
124.1Breach
130.9Neon
Neon outputs 130.9 average damage per round, edging out Breach's 124.1 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Neon secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
46.2%Breach
57.1%Neon
On the attacking side, Neon dominates with a 57.1% win rate compared to Breach's 46.2%. This 10.8 percentage point gap indicates Neon is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
42.9%Breach
53.8%Neon
Neon excels on the defensive half with a commanding 53.8% win rate, far surpassing Breach's 42.9%. This 10.8 percentage point advantage demonstrates Neon's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Breach vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 14 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 64.3% of the time compared to Breach's 35.7%, a 28.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Neon consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Neon has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Breach should never take isolated fights against Neon and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Breach vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Breach edges out Neon in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 14 matches analyzed, this Breach vs Neon matchup remains contestable for both sides. Neon shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Neon's favor.
Avg KDA
1.32Breach
1.15Neon
Breach holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.32 compared to Neon's 1.15. While this 0.17 point difference indicates Breach tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Breach's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Neon players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
13.0Breach
15.2Neon
Neon substantially outfrags Breach in this matchup, averaging 15.2 kills compared to 13.0 — a difference of nearly 2.2 eliminations per match. When Neon faces Breach, the data clearly shows Neon finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Breach players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Neon in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.4Breach
16.6Neon
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Breach (16.4 deaths/game) and Neon (16.6 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
124.1Breach
130.9Neon
Neon applies 6.8 more damage per round than Breach in this matchup (130.9 vs 124.1 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Neon contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Breach can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
25.4%Breach
22.9%Neon
Breach demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Neon: 25.4% versus 22.9%. This 2.6 percentage point gap in precision means Breach ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Neon faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Breach vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
46.2%
57.1%
Defense Side
Neon
42.9%
53.8%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Neon and Breach is dramatic: 57.1% versus 46.2%, a commanding 10.8 percentage point advantage. Neon dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Breach to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 14 competitive matches reveals Neon has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Neon. This isn't a gap that Breach can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Breach teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Breach from direct Neon engagement: give Breach lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Breach's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Breach take entry duels against Neon. The 10.8% attack gap makes entry fragging against Neon one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Breach must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Neon confrontation. Neon should actively hunt Breach entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Breach has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 8 agents in Valorant. Breach's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Breach matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Breach's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Breach excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Breach's hardest matchup?
Breach's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Breach should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Breach have?
Breach has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 8 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Breach in difficult matchups?
When playing Breach in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Breach's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Breach's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Breach's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Breach's post-plant conversion rate against Neon is catastrophic. The data shows Breach fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Neon. Never leave Breach alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Breach is the only survivor. Neon should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Breach struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Neon and Breach is substantial: 53.8% versus 42.9%, a 10.8 point chasm. Neon absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Breach cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Neon. The 10.8% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Breach: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Neon's presence is identified on their site. Neon should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Breach should avoid retake scenarios against Neon entirely when possible. The data from 14 matches shows Breach's retake conversion rate against Neon is dramatically lower than average. If Breach must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Neon should play post-plant positions knowing Breach lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Neon wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Breach must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Neon is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Breach should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Neon can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (57.1%) and defense (53.8%), comprehensively outperforming Breach across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 14 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Neon holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Breach's disadvantage in this matchup. Neon outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Breach into Neon, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Breach's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Breach in isolated Neon encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Breach when you expect to face Neon frequently. The 21.7 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Neon is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Neon decisively wins the Breach vs Neon matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Neon has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Breach players facing Neon should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics
The Initiator (Breach) vs Duelist (Neon) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Breach's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Neon's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Breach's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Neon's Duelist kit counters others. The Neon advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.3%
49.8%
48.2%
55.9%
42.9%
54.0%
53.8%
60.0%
51.9%
58.0%
52.5%
50.5%
56.5%
47.4%
52.6%
62.3%
31.9%
42.4%
40.4%
48.7%
70.6%
Breach vs Neon matchup guide: Neon leads with a 64.3% win rate, but Breach can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 14-match dataset into ranked wins.
