Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Breach's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Breach
44.4% WR
VS
Sova
55.6% WR
Who Wins the Breach vs Sova Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 9
44.4%
Win Rate
55.6%
1.37
Avg KDA
1.37
14.1
Avg Kills
15.7
17.3
Avg Deaths
15.8
118.1
DMG/Round
140.6
28.3%
HS %
28.9%
177
Combat Score
204
48.1%
Attack WR
49.5%
50.5%
Defense WR
51.9%
Breach vs Sova Performance Breakdown
In the Breach vs Sova matchup, Sova demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 9 analyzed matches, Sova outperforms Breach in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Sova the statistically favored pick when facing Breach in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.37Breach
1.37Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Breach and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.37 and 1.37 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
118.1Breach
140.6Sova
Sova delivers substantially higher damage per round (140.6 ADR) compared to Breach's 118.1 ADR. This 22.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Sova a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
48.1%Breach
49.5%Sova
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Breach at 48.1% and Sova at 49.5% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.5%Breach
51.9%Sova
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Breach posting a 50.5% win rate and Sova at 51.9%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Breach vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 9 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 55.6% of the time compared to Breach's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Initiator matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Breach should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Breach vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Sova achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Breach in the Breach vs Sova matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Sova holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 9 competitive matches, Sova players can approach duels against Breach with confidence, while Breach players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.37Breach
1.37Sova
The KDA comparison between Breach and Sova reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Breach averaging 1.37 and Sova posting 1.37. This razor-thin margin of just 0.01 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
14.1Breach
15.7Sova
Sova substantially outfrags Breach in this matchup, averaging 15.7 kills compared to 14.1 — a difference of nearly 1.6 eliminations per match. When Sova faces Breach, the data clearly shows Sova finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Breach players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Sova in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
17.3Breach
15.8Sova
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Breach, recording 15.8 deaths per game versus 17.3. Dying nearly 1.6 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Breach players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
118.1Breach
140.6Sova
The damage differential between Sova and Breach is exceptional: 140.6 ADR compared to just 118.1. Sova deals 22.5 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Sova's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Breach struggles to even trade effectively. Breach players should treat Sova as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
28.3%Breach
28.9%Sova
Sova lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (28.9% vs 28.3%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 0.6 percentage point edge translates to Sova more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Breach can fully react. Breach players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Sova's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Breach vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
48.1%
49.5%
Defense Side
Sova
50.5%
51.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sova demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Breach in this matchup, converting 49.5% of attacking rounds versus 48.1%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Sova slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Breach players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 9 competitive games suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Breach teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Sova holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Breach players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Breach has favorable matchups against 13 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Breach's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Breach matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Breach's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Breach excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Breach's hardest matchup?
Breach's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Breach should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Breach have?
Breach has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Breach in difficult matchups?
When playing Breach in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Breach's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Breach's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Breach's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Sova's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Breach should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sova shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Breach, winning 51.9% of defense rounds compared to 50.5%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Breach players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Sova can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Breach should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Sova demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Sova converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Breach should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Sova when you can wait for teammates. Sova can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Breach should be more conservative with eco aggression against Sova and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.5% attack win rate and 51.9% defense win rate. While Sova is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Breach remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Breach vs Sova specific factors. The slight Sova advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Breach and Sova are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Sova has a slight statistical edge, but Breach is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Breach, don't switch to Sova just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Initiator Dynamics
Both Breach and Sova fill the Initiator role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Initiator performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Sova is the stronger Initiator pick when these agents face each other.
In Initiator vs Initiator encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Sova's statistical advantage suggests their specific Initiator kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Breach vs Sova matchup guide: Sova leads with a 55.6% win rate, but Breach can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 9-match dataset into ranked wins.
