Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Breach's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Breach
62.5% WR
VS
Cypher
37.5% WR
Who Wins the Breach vs Cypher Matchup?
Winner
Breach
Matches: 16
62.5%
Win Rate
37.5%
1.34
Avg KDA
1.30
13.4
Avg Kills
15.3
15.7
Avg Deaths
15.6
118.4
DMG/Round
131.9
29.3%
HS %
33.6%
176
Combat Score
198
42.9%
Attack WR
44.1%
55.9%
Defense WR
57.1%
Breach vs Cypher Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 16 matches reveals that Cypher holds a clear advantage over Breach in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Breach shows strength in one category, Cypher's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.34Breach
1.30Cypher
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Breach and Cypher, with KDA ratios of 1.34 and 1.30 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
118.4Breach
131.9Cypher
Cypher outputs 131.9 average damage per round, edging out Breach's 118.4 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Cypher secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
42.9%Breach
44.1%Cypher
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Breach at 42.9% and Cypher at 44.1% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
55.9%Breach
57.1%Cypher
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Breach posting a 55.9% win rate and Cypher at 57.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Breach vs Cypher matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 16 competitive matches analyzed, Breach wins 62.5% of the time compared to Cypher's 37.5%, a 25.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Cypher consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Breach has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Cypher should never take isolated fights against Breach and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Breach vs Cypher Fragging Analysis
Cypher claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Breach vs Cypher matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 16 ranked games reveals Cypher consistently outperforms Breach in direct combat scenarios. While Breach manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Cypher in gunfights. Breach players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Cypher dominates.
Avg KDA
1.34Breach
1.30Cypher
The KDA comparison between Breach and Cypher reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Breach averaging 1.34 and Cypher posting 1.30. This razor-thin margin of just 0.04 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
13.4Breach
15.3Cypher
Cypher substantially outfrags Breach in this matchup, averaging 15.3 kills compared to 13.4 — a difference of nearly 1.9 eliminations per match. When Cypher faces Breach, the data clearly shows Cypher finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Breach players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Cypher in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
15.7Breach
15.6Cypher
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Breach (15.7 deaths/game) and Cypher (15.6 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
118.4Breach
131.9Cypher
Cypher significantly outdamages Breach in head-to-head encounters, posting 131.9 ADR versus 118.4. This 13.5 damage-per-round advantage means Cypher consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Breach players should avoid prolonged dueling with Cypher — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
29.3%Breach
33.6%Cypher
Cypher demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Breach: 33.6% versus 29.3%. This 4.2 percentage point gap in precision means Cypher ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Breach faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Breach vs Cypher Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Cypher
42.9%
44.1%
Defense Side
Cypher
55.9%
57.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
Cypher demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Breach in this matchup, converting 44.1% of attacking rounds versus 42.9%. While this 1.3 point edge gives Cypher slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Breach players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 16 competitive games suggests Cypher's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Breach teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.3% gap.
When taking entry duels, Cypher holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Breach players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Cypher can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Breach has favorable matchups against 13 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Breach's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Breach matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Breach's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Breach excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Breach's hardest matchup?
Breach's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Breach should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Breach have?
Breach has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Breach in difficult matchups?
When playing Breach in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Breach's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Breach's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Breach's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Cypher's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Breach should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.3 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Cypher shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Breach, winning 57.1% of defense rounds compared to 55.9%. This 1.3 percentage point edge suggests Cypher's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Breach players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Cypher can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.3% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Breach should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Cypher demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Cypher converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Breach should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Cypher when you can wait for teammates. Cypher can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.3% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Breach should be more conservative with eco aggression against Cypher and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Cypher can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Cypher maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 44.1% attack win rate and 57.1% defense win rate. While Cypher is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Breach remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Breach vs Cypher specific factors. The slight Cypher advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Breach and Cypher are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Cypher has a slight statistical edge, but Breach is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Breach, don't switch to Cypher just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Breach) vs Sentinel (Cypher) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Breach's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Cypher's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Breach's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Cypher's Sentinel kit counters others. The Cypher advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Breach vs Cypher matchup breakdown: Breach dominates with a 62.5% win rate across 16 matches. Superior fragging (1.34 KDA) gives Breach a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
