Sage vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
25.0%
Matches
12
KDA
1.38

Sage vs DeadlockMatchups

Sentinel
Patch13.06
Matches845,270
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedOct 3, 2026 UTC
MethodologyData Methodology

Sage vs Deadlock matchup guide: Deadlock leads with a 75.0% win rate, but Sage can still win. Learn how Sage's 138 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 12-match dataset into ranked wins.

Sage Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sage's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Sage - 25.0% win rate in this matchup
Sage
25.0% WR
VS
Deadlock vs Sage matchup - 75.0% win rate
Deadlock
75.0% WR

Who Wins the Sage vs Deadlock Matchup?

Deadlock wins the Sage vs Deadlock matchup
Winner
Deadlock
Matches: 12
25.0%
Win Rate
75.0%
1.38
Avg KDA
1.22
15.1
Avg Kills
15.4
16.1
Avg Deaths
14.7
137.9
DMG/Round
128.5
30.6%
HS %
33.4%
201
Combat Score
197
44.4%
Attack WR
53.4%
46.6%
Defense WR
55.6%

Sage vs Deadlock Performance Breakdown

Sage vs Deadlock matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

The Sage vs Deadlock matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 12 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.

Fragging Power
1.38Sage
1.22Deadlock
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Sage and Deadlock, with KDA ratios of 1.38 and 1.22 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
137.9Sage
128.5Deadlock
Sage outputs 137.9 average damage per round, edging out Deadlock's 128.5 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Sage secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
44.4%Sage
53.4%Deadlock
On the attacking side, Deadlock dominates with a 53.4% win rate compared to Sage's 44.4%. This 9.0 percentage point gap indicates Deadlock is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
46.6%Sage
55.6%Deadlock
Deadlock excels on the defensive half with a commanding 55.6% win rate, far surpassing Sage's 46.6%. This 9.0 percentage point advantage demonstrates Deadlock's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.

Sage vs Deadlock Matchup Summary

The Sage vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 12 competitive matches analyzed, Deadlock wins 75.0% of the time compared to Sage's 25.0%, a 50.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Deadlock consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Deadlock has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Sage should never take isolated fights against Deadlock and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Sage vs Deadlock Fragging Analysis

Deadlock wins fragging stats against Sage in Valorant

Deadlock edges out Sage in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 12 matches analyzed, this Sage vs Deadlock matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sage shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sage's favor.

Avg KDA
1.38Sage
1.22Deadlock
Sage holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.38 compared to Deadlock's 1.22. While this 0.17 point difference indicates Sage tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Deadlock players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sage's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Deadlock players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.1Sage
15.4Deadlock
Kill production between Sage and Deadlock is virtually identical, with Sage averaging 15.1 kills per game and Deadlock securing 15.4. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.1Sage
14.7Deadlock
Deadlock demonstrates markedly better survivability against Sage, recording 14.7 deaths per game versus 16.1. Dying nearly 1.4 fewer times per match gives Deadlock significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Sage players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
137.9Sage
128.5Deadlock
Sage applies 9.4 more damage per round than Deadlock in this matchup (137.9 vs 128.5 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Sage contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Deadlock can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.6%Sage
33.4%Deadlock
Deadlock demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Sage: 33.4% versus 30.6%. This 2.8 percentage point gap in precision means Deadlock ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Sage faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).

Sage vs Deadlock Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Deadlock
Sage44.4%
Deadlock53.4%
Defense Side
Deadlock
Sage46.6%
Deadlock55.6%

Attack Side Breakdown

Deadlock significantly outperforms Sage on attack side, achieving a 53.4% round win rate versus 44.4%. This 9.0 point disparity reveals Deadlock as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Sage cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.

Based on 12 matches analyzed, Deadlock dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Deadlock significantly. Sage teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Sage for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Sage's direct engagement with Deadlock, and consider how team composition can cover Sage's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 9.0% gap.

Sage should avoid entry fragging roles against Deadlock whenever possible. The data clearly shows Deadlock wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Sage players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Deadlock confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Deadlock can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.

Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Deadlock in this matchup. Sage struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Sage teams should never leave Sage alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Deadlock should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Deadlock substantially outclasses Sage on defense, achieving 55.6% round wins compared to 46.6%. This 9.0 percentage point gap indicates Deadlock excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Sage cannot match.

Sage should never solo anchor against Deadlock. The 9.0% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Sage. Instead, pair Sage with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Deadlock should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Sage's.

Retake dynamics heavily favor Deadlock. When Sage needs to retake against Deadlock, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Deadlock should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Sage struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Deadlock has a significant statistical edge that Sage cannot overcome through individual skill alone.

Economy management becomes critical for Sage in this matchup. Force buying against Deadlock is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Sage should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Deadlock can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.

Overall Side Analysis

Deadlock demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (53.4%) and defense (55.6%), comprehensively outperforming Sage across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 12 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Deadlock holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Sage's disadvantage in this matchup. Deadlock outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Sage into Deadlock, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Sage's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Sage in isolated Deadlock encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Sage when you expect to face Deadlock frequently. The 18.0 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Deadlock is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Deadlock decisively wins the Sage vs Deadlock matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Deadlock has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Sage players facing Deadlock should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics

Both Sage and Deadlock fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Deadlock is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.

In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Deadlock's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the Perfect Team Comp

Assemble both teams in Comp Lab, pick a map, and see role balance, per-agent map fit, and matchup edges — all computed from real competitive matches before the round starts.

  • Full 5v5 comp builder
  • Per-agent map fit & win rates
  • Matchup edges vs enemy picks
Comp Lab in the MetaBot Desktop app analyzing a Valorant team composition on Haven

Sage has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Sage's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 73.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Sage matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.06)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/​Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
45.09%2241.42135.729.5%45.9%50.9%
52.63%1331.46134.328.3%51.3%50.6%
57.27%1101.53135.530.0%50.5%53.0%
45.35%861.43133.530.6%49.3%52.2%
43.21%811.47139.830.3%46.9%51.0%
43.94%661.42131.532.3%46.4%50.1%
50.77%651.52140.927.3%49.3%48.9%
53.13%641.41129.829.4%49.8%53.5%
56.86%511.38124.627.9%49.4%55.0%
39.58%481.31126.629.7%46.3%47.2%
46.67%451.41134.728.7%45.5%52.6%
39.53%431.42129.730.2%45.5%47.7%
55.00%401.50135.726.8%53.5%50.7%
57.14%351.48130.529.7%48.9%55.5%
64.00%251.71155.128.2%53.4%53.4%
63.16%191.44139.127.4%53.4%50.7%
73.33%151.33119.929.0%55.0%56.6%
23.08%131.41145.730.0%40.6%49.6%
25.00%121.38137.930.6%44.4%46.6%
41.67%121.26132.828.0%42.7%44.4%
41.67%121.71141.634.7%49.2%49.1%
36.36%111.40150.131.1%38.6%56.4%
66.67%91.56135.025.5%54.1%53.8%
40.00%51.41124.634.8%42.3%51.7%
25.00%41.63163.923.8%51.3%40.5%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sage's best matchup in Valorant?

Sage's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 73.3% win rate. Sage excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Sage's hardest matchup?

Sage's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Sage should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Sage have?

Sage has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Sage in difficult matchups?

When playing Sage in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sage's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Sage's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Sage's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels