Sage vs Jett matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
47.7%
Matches
44
Avg KDA
1.41
Avg ADR
135

Sage vs JettMatchup

Sentinel
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Sage vs Jett is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.7% vs 52.3%). Based on 44 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.

Sage Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sage's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Jett - 47.7% win rateJett(47.7%)
Sage - 47.7% win rate in this matchup
Sage
47.7% WR
VS
Jett vs Sage matchup - 52.3% win rate
Jett
52.3% WR

Who Wins the Sage vs Jett Matchup?

Jett wins the Sage vs Jett matchup
Winner
Jett
Matches: 44
47.7%
Win Rate
52.3%
1.41
Avg KDA
1.29
14.5
Avg Kills
16.9
15.0
Avg Deaths
15.7
135.5
DMG/Round
151.6
29.4%
HS %
29.4%
205
Combat Score
236
49.1%
Attack WR
52.1%
47.9%
Defense WR
50.9%

Sage vs Jett Performance Breakdown

Sage vs Jett matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

Analysis of 44 matches reveals that Jett holds a clear advantage over Sage in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Sage shows strength in one category, Jett's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.

Fragging Power
1.41Sage
1.29Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Sage and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.41 and 1.29 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
135.5Sage
151.6Jett
Jett delivers substantially higher damage per round (151.6 ADR) compared to Sage's 135.5 ADR. This 16.1 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Jett a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
49.1%Sage
52.1%Jett
Jett shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.1% win rate versus Sage's 49.1%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Jett provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
47.9%Sage
50.9%Jett
Defensive capabilities favor Jett at 50.9% win rate compared to Sage's 47.9%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Jett provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Sage vs Jett Matchup Summary

The Sage vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 44 competitive matches analyzed, Jett wins 52.3% of the time compared to Sage's 47.7%, a 4.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Jett consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Jett has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Sage players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.

Sage vs Jett Fragging Analysis

Sage wins fragging stats against Jett in Valorant

Sage edges out Jett in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 44 matches analyzed, this Sage vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Jett shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Jett's favor.

KDA
1.41Sage
1.29Jett
Sage holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.41 compared to Jett's 1.29. While this 0.12 point difference indicates Sage tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sage's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Jett players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.5Sage
16.9Jett
Jett substantially outfrags Sage in this matchup, averaging 16.9 kills compared to 14.5 — a difference of nearly 2.4 eliminations per match. When Jett faces Sage, the data clearly shows Jett finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sage players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Jett in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
15.0Sage
15.7Jett
Sage survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.0 times per game compared to Jett's 15.7 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means Sage is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Jett players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Sage's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
135.5Sage
151.6Jett
Jett significantly outdamages Sage in head-to-head encounters, posting 151.6 ADR versus 135.5. This 16.1 damage-per-round advantage means Jett consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Sage players should avoid prolonged dueling with Jett — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
Headshot %
29.4%Sage
29.4%Jett
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Sage (29.4%) and Jett (29.4%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.

Sage vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Jett
Sage49.1%
Jett52.1%
Defense Side
Jett
Sage47.9%
Jett50.9%

Attack Side Breakdown

Jett demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Sage in this matchup, converting 52.1% of attacking rounds versus 49.1%. While this 3.0 point edge gives Jett slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Sage players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 44 competitive games suggests Jett's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Sage teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 3.0% gap.

When taking entry duels, Jett holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Sage players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Jett can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Jett's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Sage should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 3.0 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Jett shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Sage, winning 50.9% of defense rounds compared to 47.9%. This 3.0 percentage point edge suggests Jett's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Sage players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Jett can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 3.0% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Sage should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Jett demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Jett converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Sage should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Jett when you can wait for teammates. Jett can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 3.0% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Sage should be more conservative with eco aggression against Jett and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Jett can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Jett holds clear advantages on both attack (52.1%) and defense (50.9%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Sage vs Jett matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Jett doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.

Jett's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Jett performs better. Sage teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Sage with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Sage's positioning.

For ranked climbing specifically, Jett is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Jett provides a measurable ranked advantage. Sage players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Jett confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.

The verdict is clear: Jett wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 5.9 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Sage isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.

Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics

The Sentinel (Sage) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sage's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sage's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Jett advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Sage has favorable matchups against 8 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Sage's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Deadlock at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Sage matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
37.88%661.43137.427.4%43.1%49.7%
47.73%441.41135.529.4%49.1%47.9%
55.88%341.66144.831.6%49.0%55.7%
46.67%301.43138.428.2%46.8%52.7%
31.03%291.29131.330.2%45.2%44.3%
52.38%211.31121.029.6%52.9%50.7%
40.00%201.57145.826.9%42.1%54.5%
31.58%191.40129.129.9%49.5%41.2%
38.89%181.34123.027.2%41.0%53.3%
30.77%131.24127.830.3%42.6%43.3%
75.00%121.67145.727.6%60.5%55.6%
63.64%111.40127.521.3%52.1%55.6%
37.50%81.42122.325.8%49.4%48.3%
50.00%81.46147.740.1%51.1%49.4%
42.86%71.25142.325.7%44.6%46.4%
60.00%51.62185.932.5%37.0%69.6%
0.00%41.31124.829.2%39.6%42.5%
25.00%40.92105.233.6%36.4%45.5%
100.00%41.29118.225.5%56.0%58.1%
66.67%31.85132.635.1%53.6%55.3%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sage's best matchup in Valorant?

Sage's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Sage excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Sage's hardest matchup?

Sage's hardest matchup is against Deadlock, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Sage should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Sage have?

Sage has 8 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Sage in difficult matchups?

When playing Sage in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sage's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Sage's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Sage's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels