Sage vs Jett matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
52.6%
Matches
133
KDA
1.46

Sage vs JettMatchups

Sentinel
Patch13.06
Matches845,270
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedOct 3, 2026 UTC
MethodologyData Methodology

Sage vs Jett head-to-head analysis. Sage holds a 52.6% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 133 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.

Sage Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sage's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Sage - 52.6% win rate in this matchup
Sage
52.6% WR
VS
Jett vs Sage matchup - 46.6% win rate
Jett
46.6% WR

Who Wins the Sage vs Jett Matchup?

Sage wins the Sage vs Jett matchup
Winner
Sage
Matches: 133
52.6%
Win Rate
46.6%
1.46
Avg KDA
1.24
14.6
Avg Kills
16.6
14.7
Avg Deaths
15.9
134.3
DMG/Round
148.7
28.3%
HS %
29.3%
203
Combat Score
229
51.3%
Attack WR
49.4%
50.6%
Defense WR
48.7%

Sage vs Jett Performance Breakdown

Sage vs Jett matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

Analysis of 133 matches reveals that Sage holds a clear advantage over Jett in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Jett shows strength in one category, Sage's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.

Fragging Power
1.46Sage
1.24Jett
Sage maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.46 KDA versus Jett's 1.24. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Sage players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
134.3Sage
148.7Jett
Jett outputs 148.7 average damage per round, edging out Sage's 134.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Jett secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
51.3%Sage
49.4%Jett
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Sage at 51.3% and Jett at 49.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.6%Sage
48.7%Jett
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Sage posting a 50.6% win rate and Jett at 48.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.

Sage vs Jett Matchup Summary

The Sage vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 133 competitive matches analyzed, Sage wins 52.6% of the time compared to Jett's 46.6%, a 6.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Sage consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Sage dominates this matchup statistically. Sage can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Jett should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.

Sage vs Jett Fragging Analysis

Jett wins fragging stats against Sage in Valorant

Jett edges out Sage in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 133 matches analyzed, this Sage vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sage shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sage's favor.

Avg KDA
1.46Sage
1.24Jett
Sage holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.46 compared to Jett's 1.24. While this 0.22 point difference indicates Sage tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sage's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Jett players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.6Sage
16.6Jett
Jett substantially outfrags Sage in this matchup, averaging 16.6 kills compared to 14.6 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Jett faces Sage, the data clearly shows Jett finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sage players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Jett in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.7Sage
15.9Jett
Sage demonstrates markedly better survivability against Jett, recording 14.7 deaths per game versus 15.9. Dying nearly 1.2 fewer times per match gives Sage significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Jett players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
134.3Sage
148.7Jett
Jett significantly outdamages Sage in head-to-head encounters, posting 148.7 ADR versus 134.3. This 14.4 damage-per-round advantage means Jett consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Sage players should avoid prolonged dueling with Jett — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
28.3%Sage
29.3%Jett
Jett lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (29.3% vs 28.3%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.0 percentage point edge translates to Jett more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sage can fully react. Sage players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Jett's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.

Sage vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Sage
Sage51.3%
Jett49.4%
Defense Side
Sage
Sage50.6%
Jett48.7%

Attack Side Breakdown

Sage demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Jett in this matchup, converting 51.3% of attacking rounds versus 49.4%. While this 2.0 point edge gives Sage slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 133 competitive games suggests Sage's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Jett teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.0% gap.

When taking entry duels, Sage holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Jett players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Sage can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Sage's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Jett should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.0 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Sage shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Jett, winning 50.6% of defense rounds compared to 48.7%. This 2.0 percentage point edge suggests Sage's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Jett players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Sage can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.0% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Jett should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Sage demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Sage converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Jett should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Sage when you can wait for teammates. Sage can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.0% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Jett should be more conservative with eco aggression against Sage and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Sage can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Sage holds clear advantages on both attack (51.3%) and defense (50.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Sage vs Jett matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sage doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.

Sage's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sage performs better. Jett teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Jett with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Jett's positioning.

For ranked climbing specifically, Sage is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sage provides a measurable ranked advantage. Jett players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sage confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.

The verdict is clear: Sage wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.9 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Jett isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.

Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics

The Sentinel (Sage) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sage's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sage's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Sage advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

MetaBot Desktop

Build the Perfect Team Comp

Assemble both teams in Comp Lab, pick a map, and see role balance, per-agent map fit, and matchup edges — all computed from real competitive matches before the round starts.

  • Full 5v5 comp builder
  • Per-agent map fit & win rates
  • Matchup edges vs enemy picks
Comp Lab in the MetaBot Desktop app analyzing a Valorant team composition on Haven

Sage has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Sage's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 73.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 23.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Sage matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.06)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/​Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
45.09%2241.42135.729.5%45.9%50.9%
52.63%1331.46134.328.3%51.3%50.6%
57.27%1101.53135.530.0%50.5%53.0%
45.35%861.43133.530.6%49.3%52.2%
43.21%811.47139.830.3%46.9%51.0%
43.94%661.42131.532.3%46.4%50.1%
50.77%651.52140.927.3%49.3%48.9%
53.13%641.41129.829.4%49.8%53.5%
56.86%511.38124.627.9%49.4%55.0%
39.58%481.31126.629.7%46.3%47.2%
46.67%451.41134.728.7%45.5%52.6%
39.53%431.42129.730.2%45.5%47.7%
55.00%401.50135.726.8%53.5%50.7%
57.14%351.48130.529.7%48.9%55.5%
64.00%251.71155.128.2%53.4%53.4%
63.16%191.44139.127.4%53.4%50.7%
73.33%151.33119.929.0%55.0%56.6%
23.08%131.41145.730.0%40.6%49.6%
25.00%121.38137.930.6%44.4%46.6%
41.67%121.26132.828.0%42.7%44.4%
41.67%121.71141.634.7%49.2%49.1%
36.36%111.40150.131.1%38.6%56.4%
66.67%91.56135.025.5%54.1%53.8%
40.00%51.41124.634.8%42.3%51.7%
25.00%41.63163.923.8%51.3%40.5%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Sage's best matchup in Valorant?

Sage's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 73.3% win rate. Sage excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Sage's hardest matchup?

Sage's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 23.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Sage should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Sage have?

Sage has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Sage in difficult matchups?

When playing Sage in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sage's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Sage's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Sage's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels