Sage vs WaylayMatchup
Sage vs Waylay head-to-head analysis. Sage holds a 52.4% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 21 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Sage Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sage's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Sage vs Waylay Matchup?
Sage vs Waylay Performance Breakdown
The Sage vs Waylay matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 21 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Sage vs Waylay Matchup Summary
The Sage vs Waylay matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 21 competitive matches analyzed, Sage wins 52.4% of the time compared to Waylay's 47.6%, a 4.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Waylay consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Sage has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Waylay players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Sage vs Waylay Fragging Analysis
Waylay edges out Sage in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 21 matches analyzed, this Sage vs Waylay matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sage shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sage's favor.
Sage vs Waylay Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Sage holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Sage vs Waylay matchup, winning 52.9% of offensive rounds compared to 49.3% for Waylay. This 3.6 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 21 matches reveals Sage's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Sage consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Waylay teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Sage's favor in this matchup. When Sage takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Waylay. For Waylay players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Sage's advantages. Sage can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Sage's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.6% attack-side gap suggests Sage excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Waylay should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Sage's kit advantages become decisive. For Sage, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sage demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Waylay, holding 50.7% of rounds versus 47.1%. This 3.6 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Sage's defensive advantage. Sage can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Waylay should avoid solo anchor positions against Sage — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Waylay's site with Sage on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Sage in this matchup. Our 21 match analysis shows Sage converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Waylay should never attempt solo retakes against Sage — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Sage can confidently take 1vX retakes that Waylay should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Sage's defensive advantages. Waylay should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Sage, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Sage can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Waylay should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Sage holds clear advantages on both attack (52.9%) and defense (50.7%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Sage vs Waylay matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sage doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Sage's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sage performs better. Waylay teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Waylay with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Waylay's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Sage is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sage provides a measurable ranked advantage. Waylay players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sage confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Sage wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Waylay isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Sage) vs Duelist (Waylay) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sage's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Waylay's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sage's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Waylay's Duelist kit counters others. The Sage advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sage has favorable matchups against 8 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Sage's strongest matchup is against Astra with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Deadlock at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.88% | 66 | 1.43 | 137.4 | 27.4% | 43.1% | 49.7% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 1.41 | 135.5 | 29.4% | 49.1% | 47.9% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 1.66 | 144.8 | 31.6% | 49.0% | 55.7% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 1.43 | 138.4 | 28.2% | 46.8% | 52.7% | |
| 31.03% | 29 | 1.29 | 131.3 | 30.2% | 45.2% | 44.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.31 | 121.0 | 29.6% | 52.9% | 50.7% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 1.57 | 145.8 | 26.9% | 42.1% | 54.5% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 1.40 | 129.1 | 29.9% | 49.5% | 41.2% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.34 | 123.0 | 27.2% | 41.0% | 53.3% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.24 | 127.8 | 30.3% | 42.6% | 43.3% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 1.67 | 145.7 | 27.6% | 60.5% | 55.6% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.40 | 127.5 | 21.3% | 52.1% | 55.6% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.42 | 122.3 | 25.8% | 49.4% | 48.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.46 | 147.7 | 40.1% | 51.1% | 49.4% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.25 | 142.3 | 25.7% | 44.6% | 46.4% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.62 | 185.9 | 32.5% | 37.0% | 69.6% | |
| 0.00% | 4 | 1.31 | 124.8 | 29.2% | 39.6% | 42.5% | |
| 25.00% | 4 | 0.92 | 105.2 | 33.6% | 36.4% | 45.5% | |
| 100.00% | 4 | 1.29 | 118.2 | 25.5% | 56.0% | 58.1% | |
| 66.67% | 3 | 1.85 | 132.6 | 35.1% | 53.6% | 55.3% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Sage's best matchup in Valorant?
Sage's best matchup is against Astra, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Sage excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sage's hardest matchup?
Sage's hardest matchup is against Deadlock, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Sage should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sage have?
Sage has 8 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sage in difficult matchups?
When playing Sage in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sage's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sage's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sage's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.