Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sage's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sage
43.3% WR
VS
Sova
56.7% WR
Who Wins the Sage vs Sova Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 30
43.3%
Win Rate
56.7%
1.45
Avg KDA
1.46
15.7
Avg Kills
14.8
14.7
Avg Deaths
14.4
138.2
DMG/Round
140.6
31.4%
HS %
34.1%
213
Combat Score
206
47.1%
Attack WR
49.5%
50.5%
Defense WR
52.9%
Sage vs Sova Performance Breakdown
In the Sage vs Sova matchup, Sova demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 30 analyzed matches, Sova outperforms Sage in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Sova the statistically favored pick when facing Sage in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.45Sage
1.46Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Sage and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.45 and 1.46 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
138.2Sage
140.6Sova
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Sage averaging 138.2 ADR and Sova at 140.6 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
47.1%Sage
49.5%Sova
Sova shows stronger attack-side performance with a 49.5% win rate versus Sage's 47.1%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Sova provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
50.5%Sage
52.9%Sova
Defensive capabilities favor Sova at 52.9% win rate compared to Sage's 50.5%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Sova provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Sage vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 30 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 56.7% of the time compared to Sage's 43.3%, a 13.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Initiator matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Sage should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Sage vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Sova claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Sage vs Sova matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 30 ranked games reveals Sova consistently outperforms Sage in direct combat scenarios. While Sage manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Sova in gunfights. Sage players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Sova dominates.
Avg KDA
1.45Sage
1.46Sova
The KDA comparison between Sage and Sova reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Sage averaging 1.45 and Sova posting 1.46. This razor-thin margin of just 0.01 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
15.7Sage
14.8Sova
Sage secures approximately 0.9 more kills per match than Sova in this head-to-head (15.7 vs 14.8). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Sage contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Sage's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Sova can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.7Sage
14.4Sova
Sova survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.4 times per game compared to Sage's 14.7 deaths. This 0.4 death difference per match means Sova is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Sage players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Sova's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
138.2Sage
140.6Sova
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Sage (138.2 ADR) and Sova (140.6 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
31.4%Sage
34.1%Sova
Sova demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Sage: 34.1% versus 31.4%. This 2.7 percentage point gap in precision means Sova ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Sage faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Sage vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
47.1%
49.5%
Defense Side
Sova
50.5%
52.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sova demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Sage in this matchup, converting 49.5% of attacking rounds versus 47.1%. While this 2.4 point edge gives Sova slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Sage players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 30 competitive games suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Sage teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Sova holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Sage players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Sage has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 13 agents in Valorant. Sage's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 87.5% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 16.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sage matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sage's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 87.5% win rate. Sage excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sage's hardest matchup?
Sage's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 16.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Sage should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sage have?
Sage has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 13 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sage in difficult matchups?
When playing Sage in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sage's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sage's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sage's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Sova's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Sage should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sova shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Sage, winning 52.9% of defense rounds compared to 50.5%. This 2.4 percentage point edge suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Sage players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Sova can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Sage should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Sova demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Sova converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Sage should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Sova when you can wait for teammates. Sova can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Sage should be more conservative with eco aggression against Sova and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova holds clear advantages on both attack (49.5%) and defense (52.9%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Sage vs Sova matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sova doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Sova's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sova performs better. Sage teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Sage with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Sage's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Sova is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sova provides a measurable ranked advantage. Sage players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sova confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Sova wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.9 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Sage isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Initiator Dynamics
The Sentinel (Sage) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sage's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sage's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sage vs Sova matchup guide: Sova leads with a 56.7% win rate, but Sage can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 30-match dataset into ranked wins.
