Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Sage's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Sage
54.5% WR
VS
Omen
40.9% WR
Who Wins the Sage vs Omen Matchup?
Winner
Sage
Matches: 22
54.5%
Win Rate
40.9%
1.47
Avg KDA
1.67
15.0
Avg Kills
15.6
14.8
Avg Deaths
15.0
128.6
DMG/Round
137.6
30.7%
HS %
29.0%
199
Combat Score
218
49.1%
Attack WR
44.1%
55.9%
Defense WR
50.9%
Sage vs Omen Performance Breakdown
The Sage vs Omen matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 22 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.47Sage
1.67Omen
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.67 KDA versus Sage's 1.47. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
128.6Sage
137.6Omen
Omen outputs 137.6 average damage per round, edging out Sage's 128.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Omen secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.1%Sage
44.1%Omen
On the attacking side, Sage dominates with a 49.1% win rate compared to Omen's 44.1%. This 5.1 percentage point gap indicates Sage is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
55.9%Sage
50.9%Omen
Sage excels on the defensive half with a commanding 55.9% win rate, far surpassing Omen's 50.9%. This 5.1 percentage point advantage demonstrates Sage's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Sage vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 22 competitive matches analyzed, Sage wins 54.5% of the time compared to Omen's 40.9%, a 13.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Controller matchup, Sage has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Omen should never take isolated fights against Sage and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Sage vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Sage in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 22 matches analyzed, this Sage vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Sage shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Sage's favor.
Avg KDA
1.47Sage
1.67Omen
Omen holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.67 compared to Sage's 1.47. While this 0.20 point difference indicates Omen tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Sage players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Omen's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Sage players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.0Sage
15.6Omen
Omen secures approximately 0.6 more kills per match than Sage in this head-to-head (15.6 vs 15.0). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Omen contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Omen's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Sage can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.8Sage
15.0Omen
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Sage (14.8 deaths/game) and Omen (15.0 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
128.6Sage
137.6Omen
Omen applies 8.9 more damage per round than Sage in this matchup (137.6 vs 128.6 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Omen contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Sage can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.7%Sage
29.0%Omen
Sage lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (30.7% vs 29.0%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.7 percentage point edge translates to Sage more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Omen can fully react. Omen players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Sage's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Sage vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sage
49.1%
44.1%
Defense Side
Sage
55.9%
50.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sage holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Sage vs Omen matchup, winning 49.1% of offensive rounds compared to 44.1% for Omen. This 5.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 22 matches reveals Sage's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Sage consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Omen teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Sage's favor in this matchup. When Sage takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Omen. For Omen players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Sage's advantages. Sage can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Sage has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 13 agents in Valorant. Sage's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 87.5% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 16.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Sage matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Sage's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 87.5% win rate. Sage excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Sage's hardest matchup?
Sage's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 16.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Sage should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Sage have?
Sage has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 13 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Sage in difficult matchups?
When playing Sage in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Sage's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Sage's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Sage's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Sage's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 5.1% attack-side gap suggests Sage excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Omen should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Sage's kit advantages become decisive. For Sage, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sage demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Omen, holding 55.9% of rounds versus 50.9%. This 5.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Sage's defensive advantage. Sage can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Omen should avoid solo anchor positions against Sage — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Omen's site with Sage on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Sage in this matchup. Our 22 match analysis shows Sage converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Omen should never attempt solo retakes against Sage — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Sage can confidently take 1vX retakes that Omen should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Sage's defensive advantages. Omen should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Sage, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Sage can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Omen should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Sage demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (49.1%) and defense (55.9%), comprehensively outperforming Omen across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 22 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Sage holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Omen's disadvantage in this matchup. Sage outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Omen into Sage, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Omen's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Omen in isolated Sage encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Omen when you expect to face Sage frequently. The 10.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Sage is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Sage decisively wins the Sage vs Omen matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Sage has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Omen players facing Sage should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Controller Dynamics
The Sentinel (Sage) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Sage's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Sage's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Sage advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Sage vs Omen head-to-head analysis. Sage holds a 54.5% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 22 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
