时间刺客对阵 卡牌大师
时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师在LoL版本26.14中是a very close对线。时间刺客以50.0%胜率(+0.0%)击败卡牌大师，基于20场比赛。时间刺客 wins the early laning phase while 卡牌大师 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师对线的最佳时间刺客出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
时间刺客对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看时间刺客对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师对线谁赢？
时间刺客对战卡牌大师对决摘要
时间刺客对战卡牌大师在英雄联盟排位赛中是本质上是五五开的对决。根据20场近期比赛的分析，时间刺客以50.0%的胜率获胜，相比卡牌大师的50.0%，给予时间刺客 0.0个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：时间刺客控制早期对线阶段，但卡牌大师在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——时间刺客需要在卡牌大师达到强势期之前压制优势，而卡牌大师应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，卡牌大师领先0.8s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 时间刺客有统计优势，但差距足够接近，尊重卡牌大师的优势很重要。在冷却时间有利时换血，追踪敌方打野，并朝着你最强的装备节点构建，将轻微优势转化为决定性领先。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
时间刺客对战卡牌大师对线阶段分析
时间刺客在对线阶段对阵卡牌大师时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。时间刺客在伤害, 金币收入 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 时间刺客 Build Against 卡牌大师
灵能使之靴是对抗卡牌大师的最佳鞋子选择，提供时间刺客在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 时间刺客对抗卡牌大师表现最好的核心装备是影焰, 灭世者的死亡之帽 和 黄昏与黎明。这一组合给时间刺客提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装在8场比赛中有37.5%胜率。虽然整体对决可能困难，但这一装备路径给时间刺客对抗卡牌大师最好的机会。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为时间刺客对战卡牌大师对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
时间刺客83.3%
卡牌大师16.7%时间刺客35.7%卡牌大师64.3%时间刺客以令人印象深刻的83.3%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先卡牌大师 66.7个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着时间刺客可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
卡牌大师在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有64.3%胜率——比时间刺客高28.6点。长时间游戏强烈有利于卡牌大师，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
这场对决有戏剧性的力量转变：时间刺客必须积极压制早期优势并在卡牌大师达到成长节点之前结束游戏。如果卡牌大师在不太落后的情况下度过对线阶段，对决将倾向于他们。龙和峡谷先锋控制至关重要——确保早期目标的队伍可以滚雪球或争取时间成长。
Best 时间刺客 Runes Against 卡牌大师
主宰
巫术
主宰主系配巫术副系的组合帮助时间刺客在这场激烈竞争的对决中最大化潜力，提供正确的进攻和防守工具组合来超越卡牌大师。
英雄联盟26.14版本时间刺客对线数据。下表显示时间刺客对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括时间刺客最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.41% | 148 | 4.3 | 856 | 11,745 | 54.8% | 55.8% | |
| 57.14% | 140 | 3.6 | 861 | 11,797 | 62.5% | 52.6% | |
| 44.19% | 129 | 1.1 | 729 | 12,436 | 42.2% | 45.2% | |
| 46.88% | 96 | 6.0 | 831 | 11,142 | 52.3% | 42.3% | |
| 39.13% | 92 | 1.3 | 681 | 12,202 | 35.9% | 41.5% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 3.0 | 735 | 11,253 | 48.7% | 44.9% | |
| 43.53% | 85 | 5.2 | 799 | 11,966 | 50.0% | 39.2% | |
| 50.00% | 84 | 5.8 | 906 | 11,622 | 48.4% | 50.9% | |
| 41.46% | 82 | 1.0 | 735 | 11,857 | 40.5% | 42.5% | |
| 57.50% | 80 | 4.8 | 806 | 12,080 | 58.6% | 56.9% | |
| 45.57% | 79 | 1.2 | 686 | 12,629 | 41.2% | 48.9% | |
| 50.65% | 77 | 1.6 | 719 | 12,275 | 63.0% | 44.0% | |
| 56.34% | 71 | 6.2 | 831 | 12,456 | 70.0% | 46.3% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 5.5 | 805 | 11,225 | 36.0% | 46.7% | |
| 51.47% | 68 | 1.2 | 708 | 12,738 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 6.0 | 774 | 11,430 | 45.2% | 50.0% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 1.2 | 679 | 12,170 | 63.0% | 40.0% | |
| 46.97% | 66 | 3.3 | 801 | 12,104 | 50.0% | 45.0% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 1.1 | 731 | 12,932 | 52.6% | 45.2% | |
| 41.67% | 60 | 5.4 | 811 | 12,362 | 45.8% | 38.9% | |
| 58.18% | 55 | 1.1 | 741 | 12,824 | 64.7% | 55.3% | |
| 48.15% | 54 | 5.5 | 883 | 10,769 | 44.4% | 51.9% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 1.1 | 747 | 13,009 | 50.0% | 36.7% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 1.4 | 751 | 13,480 | 50.0% | 41.2% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 1.3 | 687 | 12,440 | 55.0% | 59.3% | |
| 57.78% | 45 | 6.3 | 888 | 11,887 | 58.3% | 57.1% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 6.6 | 857 | 12,557 | 50.0% | 45.8% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 5.8 | 717 | 10,995 | 40.0% | 67.9% | |
| 37.21% | 43 | 6.0 | 841 | 11,086 | 36.4% | 38.1% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 1.5 | 795 | 13,257 | 17.6% | 54.2% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 3.6 | 805 | 13,259 | 58.3% | 57.1% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 1.3 | 686 | 12,025 | 50.0% | 40.9% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 5.5 | 817 | 12,787 | 53.9% | 56.0% | |
| 64.86% | 37 | 1.1 | 714 | 11,214 | 61.9% | 68.8% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 5.8 | 929 | 10,324 | 52.6% | 50.0% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 1.8 | 824 | 12,641 | 43.8% | 38.1% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 2.5 | 743 | 13,606 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 5.8 | 804 | 12,617 | 63.6% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.1 | 743 | 12,295 | 62.5% | 38.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.7 | 772 | 12,112 | 61.5% | 33.3% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.0 | 719 | 13,061 | 50.0% | 61.9% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.1 | 717 | 12,302 | 46.1% | 42.1% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 1.1 | 624 | 11,426 | 60.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 28 | 1.1 | 742 | 12,822 | 30.0% | 61.1% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.0 | 763 | 12,413 | 36.4% | 47.1% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.4 | 668 | 12,014 | 46.1% | 46.7% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.9 | 751 | 10,095 | 53.3% | 33.3% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 6.0 | 973 | 11,457 | 25.0% | 46.7% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 1.1 | 640 | 11,328 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 5.8 | 846 | 13,055 | 20.0% | 36.8% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 6.0 | 784 | 11,707 | 80.0% | 21.4% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.8 | 837 | 13,614 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 2.8 | 733 | 11,963 | 72.7% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.3 | 860 | 12,825 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 5.7 | 938 | 10,570 | 58.3% | 70.0% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.2 | 830 | 13,377 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 2.7 | 700 | 9,932 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 1.2 | 829 | 13,076 | 77.8% | 58.3% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.6 | 712 | 10,346 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 4.8 | 940 | 11,286 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.0 | 808 | 11,946 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 6.0 | 922 | 12,725 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 727 | 12,789 | 57.1% | 61.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.6 | 746 | 11,642 | 44.4% | 54.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 682 | 12,501 | 71.4% | 46.1% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 817 | 12,534 | 83.3% | 35.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.6 | 837 | 10,379 | 66.7% | 20.0% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.5 | 685 | 11,732 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.3 | 658 | 12,750 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.5 | 770 | 9,641 | 55.6% | 20.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 5.9 | 911 | 12,820 | 75.0% | 27.3% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 4.1 | 610 | 11,637 | 28.6% | 36.4% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.7 | 886 | 10,936 | 55.6% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.9 | 722 | 11,691 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 2.3 | 735 | 13,515 | 25.0% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.0 | 844 | 14,622 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.5 | 819 | 11,945 | 33.3% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.5 | 819 | 10,717 | 55.6% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 1.3 | 732 | 11,642 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.6 | 703 | 11,325 | 60.0% | 37.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.7 | 651 | 8,996 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.2 | 804 | 13,332 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.8 | 763 | 13,669 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.0 | 700 | 12,343 | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.2 | 1,015 | 14,128 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 3.4 | 685 | 12,188 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 649 | 8,869 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 861 | 14,562 | 0.0% | 85.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 763 | 15,535 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 553 | 10,722 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.4 | 817 | 13,612 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.6 | 823 | 12,055 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.3 | 901 | 14,212 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.6 | 862 | 12,619 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 2.1 | 646 | 7,848 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.7 | 945 | 14,833 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 736 | 13,042 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.5 | 845 | 13,945 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 3.6 | 904 | 12,320 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 955 | 13,173 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.5 | 786 | 12,162 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 697 | 11,506 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.4 | 872 | 13,953 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 730 | 10,996 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.1 | 800 | 11,035 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 606 | 10,546 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.1 | 672 | 14,247 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.7 | 918 | 13,209 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.6 | 638 | 12,600 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.9 | 964 | 15,095 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.7 | 897 | 10,002 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.2 | 611 | 6,881 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 815 | 12,456 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 804 | 14,334 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.5 | 694 | 9,455 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，时间刺客对卡牌大师表现如何？
时间刺客以50.0%的胜率赢得时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师的对决，而卡牌大师为50.0%，相差0.0个百分点。该数据基于26.14版本的20场近期排位赛。
在前期，时间刺客对卡牌大师表现如何？
在前期，时间刺客对卡牌大师占有优势，胜率为83.3%对16.7%。时间刺客玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，时间刺客对卡牌大师表现如何？
在后期，卡牌大师以64.3%对35.7%的胜率主导时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师的对决。卡牌大师在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师的对决？
时间刺客在英雄联盟26.14版本中以50.0%的胜率赢得对卡牌大师的对决。0.0个百分点的优势意味着根据20场分析的比赛，时间刺客在这个线上对决中slightly占优。
对抗卡牌大师的最佳时间刺客出装是什么？
对抗卡牌大师的最佳时间刺客出装包括影焰, 灭世者的死亡之帽, 黄昏与黎明 with 灵能使之靴。This build achieves a 37.5% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗卡牌大师的最佳时间刺客符文是什么？
对抗卡牌大师的最佳时间刺客符文使用主宰主系和巫术副系。This rune setup achieves a 40.0% win rate in the 时间刺客 vs 卡牌大师 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
时间刺客克制卡牌大师吗？
是的，时间刺客对卡牌大师有利，胜率为50.0%。根据当前26.14版本数据，时间刺客在线上slightly edges out卡牌大师。
如何用时间刺客对战卡牌大师？
当时间刺客对战卡牌大师时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。