卡牌大师对阵 时间刺客
卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客在LoL版本26.11中是a decisive对线。时间刺客以60.0%胜率(+20.0%)击败卡牌大师，基于45场比赛。时间刺客 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客对线的最佳卡牌大师出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
卡牌大师对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看卡牌大师对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客对线谁赢？
卡牌大师对战时间刺客对决摘要
卡牌大师对战时间刺客在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据45场近期比赛的分析，时间刺客以60.0%的胜率获胜，相比卡牌大师的40.0%，给予时间刺客 20.0个百分点的优势。 时间刺客在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使卡牌大师玩家难以找到有利窗口，因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，卡牌大师领先0.8s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 时间刺客在这场对决中有强大优势。卡牌大师玩家应该防守性地游戏，优先在塔下安全发育，并寻找由打野压力或时间刺客过度前压创造的机会。避免长时间换血，等待团战，那里的位置和协调更重要。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
卡牌大师对战时间刺客对线阶段分析
时间刺客在对线阶段对阵卡牌大师时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。时间刺客在补刀, 伤害, 金币收入 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 卡牌大师 Build Against 时间刺客
迅速进军是对抗时间刺客的最佳鞋子选择，提供卡牌大师在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 卡牌大师对抗时间刺客表现最好的核心装备是时光之杖, 中娅沙漏 和 巫妖之祸。这一组合给卡牌大师提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装在4场比赛中达到稳固的50.0%胜率，证明它是面对时间刺客时可靠的装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为卡牌大师对战时间刺客对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
卡牌大师38.1%
时间刺客61.9%卡牌大师41.7%时间刺客58.3%时间刺客以令人印象深刻的61.9%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先卡牌大师 23.8个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着时间刺客可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
时间刺客在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有58.3%胜率——比卡牌大师高16.7点。长时间游戏强烈有利于时间刺客，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
时间刺客在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势，使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。卡牌大师玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人，而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 卡牌大师 Runes Against 时间刺客
巫术
坚决
巫术和坚决符文设置给卡牌大师在这场困难对决中与时间刺客竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.11版本卡牌大师对线数据。下表显示卡牌大师对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括卡牌大师最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.48% | 132 | 6.5 | 776 | 12,567 | 47.4% | 49.3% | |
| 52.03% | 123 | 6.8 | 769 | 13,699 | 60.4% | 45.7% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 6.5 | 762 | 12,194 | 53.3% | 47.3% | |
| 45.65% | 92 | 5.9 | 763 | 12,486 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 49.45% | 91 | 6.6 | 805 | 11,956 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 55.06% | 89 | 6.2 | 773 | 11,794 | 50.0% | 59.2% | |
| 44.71% | 85 | 6.4 | 748 | 11,848 | 41.5% | 47.7% | |
| 48.78% | 82 | 6.3 | 690 | 11,798 | 37.2% | 61.5% | |
| 44.29% | 70 | 5.9 | 733 | 12,404 | 39.3% | 47.6% | |
| 48.53% | 68 | 6.3 | 704 | 12,539 | 40.7% | 53.7% | |
| 48.53% | 68 | 6.4 | 630 | 11,597 | 36.4% | 60.0% | |
| 48.48% | 66 | 6.3 | 706 | 11,933 | 36.1% | 63.3% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 6.1 | 739 | 12,400 | 55.6% | 44.7% | |
| 42.19% | 64 | 6.2 | 863 | 12,678 | 37.9% | 45.7% | |
| 53.33% | 60 | 6.0 | 721 | 11,274 | 46.4% | 59.4% | |
| 55.93% | 59 | 6.3 | 769 | 12,913 | 54.5% | 56.8% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 6.2 | 779 | 12,497 | 72.2% | 47.1% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 5.8 | 695 | 11,554 | 38.1% | 51.7% | |
| 41.30% | 46 | 6.5 | 689 | 12,301 | 50.0% | 35.7% | |
| 40.00% | 45 | 6.4 | 833 | 12,421 | 38.1% | 41.7% | |
| 38.64% | 44 | 6.5 | 668 | 13,222 | 40.0% | 37.9% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 7.0 | 712 | 10,926 | 50.0% | 38.9% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 6.5 | 678 | 12,560 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 37.21% | 43 | 6.5 | 766 | 11,328 | 27.8% | 44.0% | |
| 58.14% | 43 | 6.3 | 707 | 11,509 | 54.2% | 63.2% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 6.1 | 758 | 11,884 | 52.2% | 57.9% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 6.3 | 848 | 13,230 | 57.1% | 63.0% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 6.5 | 673 | 12,910 | 53.3% | 36.0% | |
| 56.76% | 37 | 6.1 | 710 | 12,783 | 53.3% | 59.1% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 6.2 | 782 | 11,859 | 50.0% | 45.0% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 6.0 | 783 | 12,232 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 33 | 6.6 | 755 | 11,538 | 68.8% | 64.7% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 5.2 | 715 | 12,477 | 58.3% | 60.0% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 7.0 | 748 | 12,424 | 60.0% | 53.3% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 6.3 | 726 | 12,188 | 46.7% | 40.0% | |
| 28.00% | 25 | 5.8 | 792 | 12,298 | 30.8% | 25.0% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 6.8 | 727 | 12,946 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 6.5 | 930 | 13,854 | 75.0% | 56.3% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 6.4 | 791 | 13,867 | 62.5% | 28.6% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.8 | 931 | 11,005 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 6.6 | 906 | 12,918 | 60.0% | 63.6% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.9 | 667 | 10,779 | 63.6% | 33.3% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 6.6 | 678 | 10,690 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 621 | 11,580 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.9 | 815 | 13,122 | 75.0% | 36.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.7 | 887 | 13,704 | 57.1% | 54.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.4 | 785 | 12,386 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 17.65% | 17 | 5.9 | 521 | 9,929 | 20.0% | 14.3% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.5 | 907 | 15,241 | 100.0% | 53.9% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.6 | 746 | 14,542 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 5.8 | 508 | 12,512 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.5 | 709 | 11,576 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 5.8 | 741 | 15,066 | 25.0% | 70.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.0 | 682 | 13,334 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.9 | 902 | 12,340 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 6.4 | 937 | 13,089 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.3 | 773 | 12,652 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 4.2 | 671 | 11,822 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 5.3 | 625 | 10,630 | 44.4% | 40.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 6.1 | 883 | 12,883 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.2 | 712 | 13,038 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 6.5 | 641 | 13,046 | 83.3% | 42.9% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.8 | 581 | 12,744 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.3 | 714 | 12,554 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.9 | 839 | 13,437 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.8 | 517 | 10,012 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.8 | 935 | 11,499 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.9 | 818 | 10,802 | 60.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 3.6 | 689 | 13,407 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.2 | 684 | 13,123 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.7 | 831 | 14,073 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.9 | 989 | 14,772 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.7 | 544 | 10,923 | 16.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.7 | 885 | 13,220 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.2 | 650 | 10,984 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.7 | 573 | 13,434 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.8 | 561 | 11,914 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 639 | 12,022 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.9 | 652 | 10,979 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 733 | 10,776 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.8 | 790 | 13,263 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.0 | 545 | 12,272 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.5 | 726 | 10,366 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.1 | 548 | 10,055 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.4 | 862 | 17,828 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.1 | 728 | 10,825 | 83.3% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.4 | 893 | 9,168 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.7 | 927 | 11,957 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.6 | 949 | 13,200 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 604 | 12,817 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.4 | 501 | 8,409 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 904 | 12,785 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.1 | 510 | 10,835 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.4 | 785 | 12,469 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.5 | 779 | 12,425 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.8 | 767 | 12,559 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 699 | 8,940 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.5 | 820 | 13,727 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.8 | 535 | 9,782 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.9 | 786 | 12,047 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 771 | 12,671 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 660 | 13,733 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.4 | 483 | 6,984 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.4 | 495 | 7,612 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 640 | 12,943 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 583 | 6,056 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 653 | 11,996 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.7 | 563 | 10,559 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，卡牌大师对时间刺客表现如何？
时间刺客以60.0%的胜率赢得卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客的对决，而卡牌大师为40.0%，相差20.0个百分点。该数据基于26.11版本的45场近期排位赛。
在前期，卡牌大师对时间刺客表现如何？
在前期，时间刺客对卡牌大师占有优势，胜率为61.9%对38.1%。时间刺客玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，卡牌大师对时间刺客表现如何？
在后期，时间刺客以58.3%对41.7%的胜率主导卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客的对决。时间刺客在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客的对决？
时间刺客在英雄联盟26.11版本中以60.0%的胜率赢得对卡牌大师的对决。20.0个百分点的优势意味着根据45场分析的比赛，时间刺客在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗时间刺客的最佳卡牌大师出装是什么？
对抗时间刺客的最佳卡牌大师出装包括时光之杖, 中娅沙漏, 巫妖之祸 with 迅速进军。This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗时间刺客的最佳卡牌大师符文是什么？
对抗时间刺客的最佳卡牌大师符文使用巫术主系和坚决副系。This rune setup achieves a 40.0% win rate in the 卡牌大师 vs 时间刺客 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
卡牌大师克制时间刺客吗？
不，卡牌大师对抗时间刺客时表现吃力，胜率仅为40.0%。时间刺客在这个对决中占优。卡牌大师玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少时间刺客的领先优势。
如何用卡牌大师对战时间刺客？
当卡牌大师对战时间刺客时，谨慎游戏并避开时间刺客的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 时间刺客 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。