远古恐惧对阵 痛苦之拥
远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥在LoL版本26.3中是a decisive对线。痛苦之拥以54.8%胜率(+9.7%)击败远古恐惧，基于31场比赛。痛苦之拥 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥对线的最佳远古恐惧出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
远古恐惧 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 远古恐惧 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
痛苦之拥(45.2%)Who Wins the 远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥 Matchup?
远古恐惧对战痛苦之拥对决摘要
远古恐惧对战痛苦之拥在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据31场近期比赛的分析，痛苦之拥以54.8%的胜率获胜，相比远古恐惧的45.2%，给予痛苦之拥 9.7个百分点的优势。 痛苦之拥在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使远古恐惧玩家难以找到有利窗口，因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，远古恐惧领先1.0s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 痛苦之拥在这场对决中有强大优势。远古恐惧玩家应该防守性地游戏，优先在塔下安全发育，并寻找由打野压力或痛苦之拥过度前压创造的机会。避免长时间换血，等待团战，那里的位置和协调更重要。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
远古恐惧对战痛苦之拥对线阶段分析
远古恐惧在对线阶段对阵痛苦之拥时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。远古恐惧在补刀, 金币收入, 控制技能 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 远古恐惧 Build Against 痛苦之拥
法师之靴是对抗痛苦之拥的最佳鞋子选择，提供远古恐惧在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 远古恐惧对抗痛苦之拥表现最好的核心装备是兰德里的折磨, 影焰 和 中娅沙漏。这一组合给远古恐惧提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在3场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗痛苦之拥的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为远古恐惧对战痛苦之拥对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
远古恐惧45.5%痛苦之拥54.5%远古恐惧45.0%痛苦之拥55.0%痛苦之拥以令人印象深刻的54.5%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先远古恐惧 9.1个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着痛苦之拥可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
痛苦之拥在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有55.0%胜率——比远古恐惧高10.0点。长时间游戏强烈有利于痛苦之拥，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
痛苦之拥在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势，使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。远古恐惧玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人，而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 远古恐惧 Runes Against 痛苦之拥
主宰
巫术
主宰和巫术符文设置给远古恐惧在这场困难对决中与痛苦之拥竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.3版本远古恐惧对线数据。下表显示远古恐惧对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括远古恐惧最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.41% | 157 | 1.1 | 736 | 12,223 | 49.3% | 60.5% | |
| 56.52% | 92 | 1.3 | 735 | 12,880 | 61.1% | 53.6% | |
| 50.00% | 88 | 1.2 | 743 | 11,994 | 57.9% | 44.0% | |
| 45.45% | 88 | 1.0 | 799 | 12,628 | 37.8% | 51.0% | |
| 48.78% | 82 | 1.2 | 751 | 12,191 | 50.0% | 47.7% | |
| 50.62% | 81 | 1.2 | 802 | 13,003 | 53.9% | 49.1% | |
| 48.65% | 74 | 1.0 | 687 | 12,831 | 64.7% | 35.0% | |
| 40.54% | 74 | 1.1 | 720 | 11,776 | 30.3% | 48.8% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.3 | 698 | 12,230 | 41.9% | 46.5% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 1.2 | 776 | 12,820 | 41.4% | 64.1% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 1.0 | 746 | 12,389 | 47.8% | 55.8% | |
| 52.38% | 63 | 1.6 | 950 | 12,474 | 59.3% | 47.2% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 1.7 | 717 | 10,498 | 42.4% | 52.0% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 1.4 | 736 | 13,183 | 47.1% | 48.7% | |
| 60.38% | 53 | 1.0 | 724 | 11,981 | 73.1% | 48.1% | |
| 33.96% | 53 | 1.1 | 798 | 12,226 | 28.0% | 39.3% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 1.2 | 719 | 11,506 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 1.2 | 858 | 13,715 | 50.0% | 51.6% | |
| 64.44% | 45 | 1.1 | 671 | 12,212 | 56.3% | 69.0% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 2.0 | 762 | 12,215 | 50.0% | 65.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 0.9 | 723 | 10,801 | 52.2% | 58.8% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 0.9 | 691 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 35.14% | 37 | 1.1 | 766 | 13,007 | 33.3% | 36.0% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.1 | 771 | 13,157 | 53.9% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.2 | 865 | 13,480 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.1 | 774 | 13,083 | 57.1% | 45.5% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 1.1 | 862 | 11,869 | 52.9% | 52.6% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 0.9 | 742 | 10,926 | 42.1% | 41.2% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 1.8 | 757 | 11,566 | 60.0% | 43.5% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.1 | 737 | 12,978 | 45.5% | 45.0% | |
| 34.48% | 29 | 1.7 | 808 | 12,299 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.2 | 903 | 12,562 | 33.3% | 47.4% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,405 | 54.5% | 62.5% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.6 | 760 | 11,464 | 75.0% | 46.7% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.0 | 654 | 11,050 | 75.0% | 30.0% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 1.4 | 849 | 13,232 | 25.0% | 38.9% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 772 | 11,230 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.5 | 705 | 11,735 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.4 | 701 | 10,553 | 46.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.6 | 764 | 11,161 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 1.6 | 805 | 10,577 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 0.9 | 756 | 13,348 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.1 | 768 | 13,308 | 60.0% | 63.6% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 2.1 | 687 | 10,423 | 25.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 938 | 15,400 | 60.0% | 46.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 746 | 11,448 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 736 | 11,217 | 42.9% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 787 | 12,942 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 1.5 | 598 | 8,666 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 77.78% | 18 | 1.0 | 839 | 12,496 | 71.4% | 81.8% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 733 | 10,318 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.2 | 867 | 14,460 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.8 | 947 | 11,593 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.2 | 798 | 10,630 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 2.6 | 830 | 12,985 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 663 | 9,819 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.2 | 703 | 11,740 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.3 | 736 | 11,142 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.0 | 682 | 11,749 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 795 | 14,248 | 0.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 0.9 | 730 | 13,113 | 100.0% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.1 | 573 | 8,377 | 22.2% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.3 | 766 | 13,074 | 16.7% | 75.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.0 | 924 | 11,563 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.4 | 589 | 7,622 | 77.8% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 660 | 9,954 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.9 | 772 | 11,262 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.3 | 963 | 13,033 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.3 | 731 | 9,251 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.2 | 1,043 | 13,035 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.1 | 1,042 | 12,344 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.3 | 933 | 14,252 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.0 | 738 | 9,976 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.4 | 622 | 10,882 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.3 | 757 | 13,073 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.2 | 636 | 10,047 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 1,011 | 11,051 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 581 | 9,007 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 654 | 8,518 | 42.9% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 747 | 10,430 | 20.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 824 | 11,897 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 804 | 9,814 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.7 | 893 | 10,742 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 977 | 14,227 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 780 | 10,010 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 587 | 7,540 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 605 | 6,293 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 785 | 9,785 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 644 | 10,560 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 464 | 8,456 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.1 | 813 | 10,176 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 408 | 6,724 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 926 | 13,163 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 3.3 | 798 | 11,900 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 897 | 9,383 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.5 | 756 | 11,348 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 3.4 | 850 | 10,193 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 829 | 12,142 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.9 | 960 | 10,105 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.1 | 848 | 12,560 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 726 | 11,465 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 895 | 12,080 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.6 | 996 | 14,327 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 665 | 10,770 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 607 | 8,716 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,018 | 11,435 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 694 | 8,396 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 1,051 | 10,723 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 940 | 12,800 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 824 | 11,250 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 735 | 10,474 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 590 | 10,183 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 687 | 10,483 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 1,245 | 12,437 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，远古恐惧对痛苦之拥表现如何？
痛苦之拥以54.8%的胜率赢得远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥的对决，而远古恐惧为45.2%，相差9.7个百分点。该数据基于26.3版本的31场近期排位赛。
在前期，远古恐惧对痛苦之拥表现如何？
在前期，痛苦之拥对远古恐惧占有优势，胜率为54.5%对45.5%。痛苦之拥玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，远古恐惧对痛苦之拥表现如何？
在后期，痛苦之拥以55.0%对45.0%的胜率主导远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥的对决。痛苦之拥在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥的对决？
痛苦之拥在英雄联盟26.3版本中以54.8%的胜率赢得对远古恐惧的对决。9.7个百分点的优势意味着根据31场分析的比赛，痛苦之拥在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗痛苦之拥的最佳远古恐惧出装是什么？
对抗痛苦之拥的最佳远古恐惧出装包括兰德里的折磨, 影焰, 中娅沙漏 with 法师之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗痛苦之拥的最佳远古恐惧符文是什么？
对抗痛苦之拥的最佳远古恐惧符文使用主宰主系和巫术副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 远古恐惧 vs 痛苦之拥 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
远古恐惧克制痛苦之拥吗？
不，远古恐惧对抗痛苦之拥时表现吃力，胜率仅为45.2%。痛苦之拥在这个对决中占优。远古恐惧玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少痛苦之拥的领先优势。
如何用远古恐惧对战痛苦之拥？
当远古恐惧对战痛苦之拥时，谨慎游戏并避开痛苦之拥的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 痛苦之拥 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。