远古恐惧对阵 无极剑圣
远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣在LoL版本26.3中是a moderate对线。无极剑圣以51.2%胜率(+2.4%)击败远古恐惧，基于82场比赛。远古恐惧 wins the early laning phase while 无极剑圣 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣对线的最佳远古恐惧出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
远古恐惧 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 远古恐惧 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
无极剑圣(48.8%)Who Wins the 远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣 Matchup?
远古恐惧对战无极剑圣对决摘要
远古恐惧对战无极剑圣在英雄联盟排位赛中是非常接近的对决。根据82场近期比赛的分析，无极剑圣以51.2%的胜率获胜，相比远古恐惧的48.8%，给予无极剑圣 2.4个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：远古恐惧控制早期对线阶段，但无极剑圣在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——远古恐惧需要在无极剑圣达到强势期之前压制优势，而无极剑圣应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，远古恐惧领先1.2s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 虽然无极剑圣略占优势，但远古恐惧绝对可以通过聪明的换血模式和波浪管理赢得这条线。专注于围绕你的冷却时间进行游戏，只在必要时放弃补刀，并利用无极剑圣的失误。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
远古恐惧对战无极剑圣对线阶段分析
远古恐惧在对线阶段对阵无极剑圣时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。远古恐惧在伤害, 控制技能 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 远古恐惧 Build Against 无极剑圣
法师之靴是对抗无极剑圣的最佳鞋子选择，提供远古恐惧在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 远古恐惧对抗无极剑圣表现最好的核心装备是兰德里的折磨, 影焰 和 虚空之杖。这一组合给远古恐惧提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在3场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗无极剑圣的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为远古恐惧对战无极剑圣对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
远古恐惧50.0%无极剑圣50.0%远古恐惧47.7%无极剑圣52.3%前期（前15分钟）是远古恐惧和无极剑圣之间的抛硬币，远古恐惧以微弱的50.0%胜率优势领先（+0.0%）。个人技术和打野位置在早期对线阶段比英雄优势更重要。
在后期（25分钟以上），无极剑圣以52.3%胜率接管，领先远古恐惧 4.5个百分点。无极剑圣在团战和目标争夺中成长更有效。
力量动态随着游戏进行而变化——远古恐惧早期有优势，但无极剑圣逐渐接管。然而，差距足够小，任何英雄都可以在任何阶段用正确的操作获胜。专注于在有优势时利用它们，而不是等待特定的游戏阶段。
Best 远古恐惧 Runes Against 无极剑圣
启迪
主宰
启迪主系配主宰副系的组合帮助远古恐惧在这场激烈竞争的对决中最大化潜力，提供正确的进攻和防守工具组合来超越无极剑圣。
英雄联盟26.3版本远古恐惧对线数据。下表显示远古恐惧对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括远古恐惧最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.41% | 157 | 1.1 | 736 | 12,223 | 49.3% | 60.5% | |
| 56.52% | 92 | 1.3 | 735 | 12,880 | 61.1% | 53.6% | |
| 50.00% | 88 | 1.2 | 743 | 11,994 | 57.9% | 44.0% | |
| 45.45% | 88 | 1.0 | 799 | 12,628 | 37.8% | 51.0% | |
| 48.78% | 82 | 1.2 | 751 | 12,191 | 50.0% | 47.7% | |
| 50.62% | 81 | 1.2 | 802 | 13,003 | 53.9% | 49.1% | |
| 48.65% | 74 | 1.0 | 687 | 12,831 | 64.7% | 35.0% | |
| 40.54% | 74 | 1.1 | 720 | 11,776 | 30.3% | 48.8% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.3 | 698 | 12,230 | 41.9% | 46.5% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 1.2 | 776 | 12,820 | 41.4% | 64.1% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 1.0 | 746 | 12,389 | 47.8% | 55.8% | |
| 52.38% | 63 | 1.6 | 950 | 12,474 | 59.3% | 47.2% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 1.7 | 717 | 10,498 | 42.4% | 52.0% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 1.4 | 736 | 13,183 | 47.1% | 48.7% | |
| 60.38% | 53 | 1.0 | 724 | 11,981 | 73.1% | 48.1% | |
| 33.96% | 53 | 1.1 | 798 | 12,226 | 28.0% | 39.3% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 1.2 | 719 | 11,506 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 1.2 | 858 | 13,715 | 50.0% | 51.6% | |
| 64.44% | 45 | 1.1 | 671 | 12,212 | 56.3% | 69.0% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 2.0 | 762 | 12,215 | 50.0% | 65.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 0.9 | 723 | 10,801 | 52.2% | 58.8% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 0.9 | 691 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 35.14% | 37 | 1.1 | 766 | 13,007 | 33.3% | 36.0% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.1 | 771 | 13,157 | 53.9% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.2 | 865 | 13,480 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.1 | 774 | 13,083 | 57.1% | 45.5% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 1.1 | 862 | 11,869 | 52.9% | 52.6% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 0.9 | 742 | 10,926 | 42.1% | 41.2% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 1.8 | 757 | 11,566 | 60.0% | 43.5% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.1 | 737 | 12,978 | 45.5% | 45.0% | |
| 34.48% | 29 | 1.7 | 808 | 12,299 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.2 | 903 | 12,562 | 33.3% | 47.4% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,405 | 54.5% | 62.5% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.6 | 760 | 11,464 | 75.0% | 46.7% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.0 | 654 | 11,050 | 75.0% | 30.0% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 1.4 | 849 | 13,232 | 25.0% | 38.9% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 772 | 11,230 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.5 | 705 | 11,735 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.4 | 701 | 10,553 | 46.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.6 | 764 | 11,161 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 1.6 | 805 | 10,577 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 0.9 | 756 | 13,348 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.1 | 768 | 13,308 | 60.0% | 63.6% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 2.1 | 687 | 10,423 | 25.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 938 | 15,400 | 60.0% | 46.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 746 | 11,448 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 736 | 11,217 | 42.9% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 787 | 12,942 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 1.5 | 598 | 8,666 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 77.78% | 18 | 1.0 | 839 | 12,496 | 71.4% | 81.8% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 733 | 10,318 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.2 | 867 | 14,460 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.8 | 947 | 11,593 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.2 | 798 | 10,630 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 2.6 | 830 | 12,985 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 663 | 9,819 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.2 | 703 | 11,740 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.3 | 736 | 11,142 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.0 | 682 | 11,749 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 795 | 14,248 | 0.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 0.9 | 730 | 13,113 | 100.0% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.1 | 573 | 8,377 | 22.2% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.3 | 766 | 13,074 | 16.7% | 75.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.0 | 924 | 11,563 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.4 | 589 | 7,622 | 77.8% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 660 | 9,954 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.9 | 772 | 11,262 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.3 | 963 | 13,033 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.3 | 731 | 9,251 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.2 | 1,043 | 13,035 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.1 | 1,042 | 12,344 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.3 | 933 | 14,252 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.0 | 738 | 9,976 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.4 | 622 | 10,882 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.3 | 757 | 13,073 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.2 | 636 | 10,047 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 1,011 | 11,051 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 581 | 9,007 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 654 | 8,518 | 42.9% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 747 | 10,430 | 20.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 824 | 11,897 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 804 | 9,814 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.7 | 893 | 10,742 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 977 | 14,227 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 780 | 10,010 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 587 | 7,540 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 605 | 6,293 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 785 | 9,785 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 644 | 10,560 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 464 | 8,456 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.1 | 813 | 10,176 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 408 | 6,724 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 926 | 13,163 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 3.3 | 798 | 11,900 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 897 | 9,383 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.5 | 756 | 11,348 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 3.4 | 850 | 10,193 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 829 | 12,142 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.9 | 960 | 10,105 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.1 | 848 | 12,560 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 726 | 11,465 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 895 | 12,080 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.6 | 996 | 14,327 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 665 | 10,770 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 607 | 8,716 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,018 | 11,435 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 694 | 8,396 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 1,051 | 10,723 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 940 | 12,800 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 824 | 11,250 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 735 | 10,474 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 590 | 10,183 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 687 | 10,483 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 1,245 | 12,437 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，远古恐惧对无极剑圣表现如何？
无极剑圣以51.2%的胜率赢得远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣的对决，而远古恐惧为48.8%，相差2.4个百分点。该数据基于26.3版本的82场近期排位赛。
在前期，远古恐惧对无极剑圣表现如何？
在前期，远古恐惧对无极剑圣占有优势，胜率为50.0%对50.0%。远古恐惧玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，远古恐惧对无极剑圣表现如何？
在后期，无极剑圣以52.3%对47.7%的胜率主导远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣的对决。无极剑圣在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣的对决？
无极剑圣在英雄联盟26.3版本中以51.2%的胜率赢得对远古恐惧的对决。2.4个百分点的优势意味着根据82场分析的比赛，无极剑圣在这个线上对决中moderately占优。
对抗无极剑圣的最佳远古恐惧出装是什么？
对抗无极剑圣的最佳远古恐惧出装包括兰德里的折磨, 影焰, 虚空之杖 with 法师之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗无极剑圣的最佳远古恐惧符文是什么？
对抗无极剑圣的最佳远古恐惧符文使用启迪主系和主宰副系。This rune setup achieves a 56.3% win rate in the 远古恐惧 vs 无极剑圣 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
远古恐惧克制无极剑圣吗？
不，远古恐惧对抗无极剑圣时表现吃力，胜率仅为48.8%。无极剑圣在这个对决中占优。远古恐惧玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少无极剑圣的领先优势。
如何用远古恐惧对战无极剑圣？
当远古恐惧对战无极剑圣时，谨慎游戏并避开无极剑圣的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 无极剑圣 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。