
远古恐惧对阵 皮城执法官
远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官在LoL版本26.3中是a decisive对线。远古恐惧以64.4%胜率(+28.9%)击败皮城执法官,基于45场比赛。远古恐惧 holds the advantage in both the early and late game.下方您将找到远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官对线的最佳远古恐惧出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
远古恐惧 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 远古恐惧 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the 远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官 Matchup?

远古恐惧对战皮城执法官对决摘要
远古恐惧对战皮城执法官在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据45场近期比赛的分析,远古恐惧以64.4%的胜率获胜,相比皮城执法官的35.6%,给予远古恐惧 28.9个百分点的优势。 远古恐惧在每个阶段都占据主导——从早期对线到后期团战。这种持续的优势使皮城执法官玩家难以找到有利窗口,因此依赖团队的策略和避免单挑至关重要。 最显著的统计差距在续航方面,皮城执法官领先552 HP/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 远古恐惧玩家可以自信地选择对抗皮城执法官并从1级开始激进地游戏。尽早通过有利的换血建立线上统治权,并尽可能将皮城执法官从补刀中挤走。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
远古恐惧对战皮城执法官对线阶段分析
远古恐惧在对线阶段对阵皮城执法官时更有优势,赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。远古恐惧在补刀, 伤害 和 控制技能方面有优势,使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 远古恐惧 Build Against 皮城执法官
法师之靴是对抗皮城执法官的最佳鞋子选择,提供远古恐惧在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 远古恐惧对抗皮城执法官表现最好的核心装备是兰德里的折磨, 影焰 和 残疫。这一组合给远古恐惧提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色,在4场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平,使其成为对抗皮城执法官的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整,但这套出装为远古恐惧对战皮城执法官对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
远古恐惧以令人印象深刻的56.3%胜率主导前期(前15分钟)——领先皮城执法官 12.5个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着远古恐惧可以从1级开始决定线上节奏,控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
远古恐惧在后期(25分钟以上)远远更强,拥有69.0%胜率——比皮城执法官高37.9点。长时间游戏强烈有利于远古恐惧,其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
远古恐惧在游戏的每个阶段都保持优势,使这成为从对线到后期团战都一贯有利的对决。皮城执法官玩家应该寻找精彩操作、依赖团队的策略和抓人,而不是依赖成长来赢得这场对决。
Best 远古恐惧 Runes Against 皮城执法官
使用主宰主系配启迪副系允许远古恐惧压制对皮城执法官的优势,放大使这场对决有利的优势。
英雄联盟26.3版本远古恐惧对线数据。下表显示远古恐惧对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析,包括远古恐惧最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.41% | 157 | 1.1 | 736 | 12,223 | 49.3% | 60.5% | |
| 56.52% | 92 | 1.3 | 735 | 12,880 | 61.1% | 53.6% | |
| 50.00% | 88 | 1.2 | 743 | 11,994 | 57.9% | 44.0% | |
| 45.45% | 88 | 1.0 | 799 | 12,628 | 37.8% | 51.0% | |
| 48.78% | 82 | 1.2 | 751 | 12,191 | 50.0% | 47.7% | |
| 50.62% | 81 | 1.2 | 802 | 13,003 | 53.9% | 49.1% | |
| 48.65% | 74 | 1.0 | 687 | 12,831 | 64.7% | 35.0% | |
| 40.54% | 74 | 1.1 | 720 | 11,776 | 30.3% | 48.8% | |
| 44.59% | 74 | 1.3 | 698 | 12,230 | 41.9% | 46.5% | |
| 54.41% | 68 | 1.2 | 776 | 12,820 | 41.4% | 64.1% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 1.0 | 746 | 12,389 | 47.8% | 55.8% | |
| 52.38% | 63 | 1.6 | 950 | 12,474 | 59.3% | 47.2% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 1.7 | 717 | 10,498 | 42.4% | 52.0% | |
| 48.21% | 56 | 1.4 | 736 | 13,183 | 47.1% | 48.7% | |
| 60.38% | 53 | 1.0 | 724 | 11,981 | 73.1% | 48.1% | |
| 33.96% | 53 | 1.1 | 798 | 12,226 | 28.0% | 39.3% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 1.2 | 719 | 11,506 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 1.2 | 858 | 13,715 | 50.0% | 51.6% | |
| 64.44% | 45 | 1.1 | 671 | 12,212 | 56.3% | 69.0% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 2.0 | 762 | 12,215 | 50.0% | 65.5% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 0.9 | 723 | 10,801 | 52.2% | 58.8% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 0.9 | 691 | 13,018 | 50.0% | 56.5% | |
| 35.14% | 37 | 1.1 | 766 | 13,007 | 33.3% | 36.0% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.1 | 771 | 13,157 | 53.9% | 54.2% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.2 | 865 | 13,480 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.1 | 774 | 13,083 | 57.1% | 45.5% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 1.1 | 862 | 11,869 | 52.9% | 52.6% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 0.9 | 742 | 10,926 | 42.1% | 41.2% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 1.8 | 757 | 11,566 | 60.0% | 43.5% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.1 | 737 | 12,978 | 45.5% | 45.0% | |
| 34.48% | 29 | 1.7 | 808 | 12,299 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 1.2 | 903 | 12,562 | 33.3% | 47.4% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.2 | 721 | 12,405 | 54.5% | 62.5% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.6 | 760 | 11,464 | 75.0% | 46.7% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.0 | 654 | 11,050 | 75.0% | 30.0% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 1.4 | 849 | 13,232 | 25.0% | 38.9% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 3.0 | 772 | 11,230 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.5 | 705 | 11,735 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 2.4 | 701 | 10,553 | 46.1% | 33.3% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.6 | 764 | 11,161 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 1.6 | 805 | 10,577 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 0.9 | 756 | 13,348 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.1 | 768 | 13,308 | 60.0% | 63.6% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 2.1 | 687 | 10,423 | 25.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 938 | 15,400 | 60.0% | 46.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 746 | 11,448 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 736 | 11,217 | 42.9% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 787 | 12,942 | 62.5% | 41.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 1.5 | 598 | 8,666 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 77.78% | 18 | 1.0 | 839 | 12,496 | 71.4% | 81.8% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.9 | 733 | 10,318 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 1.2 | 867 | 14,460 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.8 | 947 | 11,593 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 3.2 | 798 | 10,630 | 44.4% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 2.6 | 830 | 12,985 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 1.6 | 663 | 9,819 | 33.3% | 30.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.2 | 703 | 11,740 | 42.9% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 2.3 | 736 | 11,142 | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.0 | 682 | 11,749 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.6 | 795 | 14,248 | 0.0% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 0.9 | 730 | 13,113 | 100.0% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 2.1 | 573 | 8,377 | 22.2% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.3 | 766 | 13,074 | 16.7% | 75.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.0 | 924 | 11,563 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.4 | 589 | 7,622 | 77.8% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 660 | 9,954 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.9 | 772 | 11,262 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.3 | 963 | 13,033 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.3 | 731 | 9,251 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.2 | 1,043 | 13,035 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.1 | 1,042 | 12,344 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.3 | 933 | 14,252 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 2.0 | 738 | 9,976 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.4 | 622 | 10,882 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.3 | 757 | 13,073 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.2 | 636 | 10,047 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 1,011 | 11,051 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 581 | 9,007 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 654 | 8,518 | 42.9% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 747 | 10,430 | 20.0% | 20.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 824 | 11,897 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 804 | 9,814 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.7 | 893 | 10,742 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 977 | 14,227 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 2.7 | 780 | 10,010 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 587 | 7,540 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 605 | 6,293 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 785 | 9,785 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 644 | 10,560 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 464 | 8,456 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.1 | 813 | 10,176 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 2.2 | 408 | 6,724 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 926 | 13,163 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 3.3 | 798 | 11,900 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.0 | 897 | 9,383 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.5 | 756 | 11,348 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 3.4 | 850 | 10,193 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 829 | 12,142 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.9 | 960 | 10,105 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.1 | 848 | 12,560 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 726 | 11,465 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.7 | 895 | 12,080 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.6 | 996 | 14,327 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 665 | 10,770 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 607 | 8,716 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,018 | 11,435 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 694 | 8,396 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.5 | 1,051 | 10,723 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 940 | 12,800 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 824 | 11,250 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 735 | 10,474 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 590 | 10,183 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 687 | 10,483 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 1,245 | 12,437 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中,远古恐惧对皮城执法官表现如何?
远古恐惧以64.4%的胜率赢得远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官的对决,而皮城执法官为35.6%,相差28.9个百分点。该数据基于26.3版本的45场近期排位赛。
在前期,远古恐惧对皮城执法官表现如何?
在前期,远古恐惧对皮城执法官占有优势,胜率为56.3%对43.8%。远古恐惧玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期,远古恐惧对皮城执法官表现如何?
在后期,远古恐惧以69.0%对31.0%的胜率主导远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官的对决。远古恐惧在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官的对决?
远古恐惧在英雄联盟26.3版本中以64.4%的胜率赢得对皮城执法官的对决。28.9个百分点的优势意味着根据45场分析的比赛,远古恐惧在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗皮城执法官的最佳远古恐惧出装是什么?
对抗皮城执法官的最佳远古恐惧出装包括兰德里的折磨, 影焰, 残疫 with 法师之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗皮城执法官的最佳远古恐惧符文是什么?
对抗皮城执法官的最佳远古恐惧符文使用主宰主系和启迪副系。This rune setup achieves a 71.4% win rate in the 远古恐惧 vs 皮城执法官 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
远古恐惧克制皮城执法官吗?
是的,远古恐惧对皮城执法官有利,胜率为64.4%。根据当前26.3版本数据,远古恐惧在线上strongly counters皮城执法官。
如何用远古恐惧对战皮城执法官?
当远古恐惧对战皮城执法官时,利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。
