恶魔小丑对阵 荆棘之兴
恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴在LoL版本26.3中是a moderate对线。恶魔小丑以51.9%胜率(+3.7%)击败荆棘之兴，基于27场比赛。荆棘之兴 wins the early laning phase while 恶魔小丑 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴对线的最佳恶魔小丑出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
恶魔小丑 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 恶魔小丑 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
荆棘之兴(51.9%)Who Wins the 恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴 Matchup?
恶魔小丑对战荆棘之兴对决摘要
恶魔小丑对战荆棘之兴在英雄联盟排位赛中是中等程度的对决。根据27场近期比赛的分析，恶魔小丑以51.9%的胜率获胜，相比荆棘之兴的48.1%，给予恶魔小丑 3.7个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：荆棘之兴控制早期对线阶段，但恶魔小丑在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——荆棘之兴需要在恶魔小丑达到强势期之前压制优势，而恶魔小丑应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，荆棘之兴领先0.6s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 恶魔小丑有统计优势，但差距足够接近，尊重荆棘之兴的优势很重要。在冷却时间有利时换血，追踪敌方打野，并朝着你最强的装备节点构建，将轻微优势转化为决定性领先。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
恶魔小丑对战荆棘之兴对线阶段分析
荆棘之兴在对线阶段对阵恶魔小丑时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。荆棘之兴在补刀, 伤害 和 控制技能方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 恶魔小丑 Build Against 荆棘之兴
明朗之靴是对抗荆棘之兴的最佳鞋子选择，提供恶魔小丑在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 恶魔小丑对抗荆棘之兴表现最好的核心装备是兰德里的折磨, 帝国指令 和 蜕生。这一组合给恶魔小丑提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在1场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗荆棘之兴的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为恶魔小丑对战荆棘之兴对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
恶魔小丑25.0%荆棘之兴75.0%恶魔小丑63.2%荆棘之兴36.8%荆棘之兴以令人印象深刻的75.0%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先恶魔小丑 50.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着荆棘之兴可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
恶魔小丑在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有63.2%胜率——比荆棘之兴高26.3点。长时间游戏强烈有利于恶魔小丑，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
这场对决有戏剧性的力量转变：荆棘之兴必须积极压制早期优势并在恶魔小丑达到成长节点之前结束游戏。如果恶魔小丑在不太落后的情况下度过对线阶段，对决将倾向于他们。龙和峡谷先锋控制至关重要——确保早期目标的队伍可以滚雪球或争取时间成长。
Best 恶魔小丑 Runes Against 荆棘之兴
巫术
精密
使用巫术主系配精密副系允许恶魔小丑压制对荆棘之兴的优势，放大使这场对决有利的优势。
英雄联盟26.3版本恶魔小丑对线数据。下表显示恶魔小丑对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括恶魔小丑最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.26% | 287 | 0.9 | 717 | 12,869 | 55.9% | 50.0% | |
| 54.30% | 151 | 0.8 | 738 | 12,951 | 50.0% | 56.8% | |
| 50.34% | 147 | 1.0 | 711 | 12,979 | 57.4% | 46.2% | |
| 43.45% | 145 | 0.8 | 684 | 13,316 | 58.0% | 35.8% | |
| 48.23% | 141 | 0.8 | 729 | 12,880 | 47.5% | 48.8% | |
| 48.92% | 139 | 0.9 | 738 | 13,056 | 47.2% | 50.0% | |
| 55.47% | 137 | 0.9 | 788 | 12,671 | 54.5% | 56.1% | |
| 45.86% | 133 | 0.9 | 686 | 12,934 | 48.9% | 44.3% | |
| 51.52% | 132 | 0.8 | 715 | 12,469 | 46.1% | 55.0% | |
| 51.82% | 110 | 0.9 | 719 | 12,755 | 43.8% | 58.1% | |
| 45.28% | 106 | 0.8 | 727 | 13,061 | 43.9% | 46.1% | |
| 56.47% | 85 | 0.9 | 722 | 13,018 | 65.7% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 84 | 0.8 | 672 | 13,071 | 50.0% | 46.4% | |
| 51.22% | 82 | 1.0 | 817 | 12,488 | 44.1% | 56.3% | |
| 45.68% | 81 | 0.8 | 724 | 12,298 | 58.1% | 38.0% | |
| 50.63% | 79 | 0.8 | 702 | 12,864 | 45.2% | 54.2% | |
| 46.84% | 79 | 1.1 | 704 | 12,177 | 45.2% | 47.9% | |
| 42.31% | 78 | 0.9 | 695 | 12,946 | 51.5% | 35.6% | |
| 39.47% | 76 | 0.9 | 759 | 13,056 | 37.5% | 40.4% | |
| 50.00% | 74 | 1.4 | 789 | 13,680 | 54.2% | 48.0% | |
| 52.11% | 71 | 0.9 | 765 | 12,516 | 50.0% | 54.0% | |
| 47.14% | 70 | 1.1 | 782 | 12,519 | 53.9% | 43.2% | |
| 48.53% | 68 | 0.8 | 691 | 12,496 | 53.3% | 44.7% | |
| 50.00% | 66 | 1.2 | 700 | 12,916 | 39.1% | 55.8% | |
| 52.31% | 66 | 1.6 | 649 | 9,641 | 57.7% | 48.7% | |
| 52.31% | 65 | 0.8 | 762 | 12,570 | 48.1% | 55.3% | |
| 46.77% | 62 | 0.9 | 660 | 13,088 | 48.1% | 45.7% | |
| 44.26% | 61 | 0.9 | 721 | 12,905 | 50.0% | 41.0% | |
| 31.67% | 60 | 1.6 | 717 | 9,514 | 30.0% | 33.3% | |
| 51.79% | 56 | 1.0 | 784 | 13,938 | 52.9% | 51.3% | |
| 43.64% | 55 | 1.0 | 689 | 12,376 | 42.9% | 44.1% | |
| 65.45% | 55 | 0.9 | 702 | 13,685 | 72.2% | 62.2% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.4 | 705 | 11,104 | 45.5% | 53.1% | |
| 45.10% | 51 | 0.8 | 667 | 13,091 | 50.0% | 41.9% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 1.0 | 791 | 13,471 | 60.0% | 65.6% | |
| 36.17% | 47 | 0.9 | 678 | 12,385 | 43.8% | 32.3% | |
| 65.91% | 44 | 1.5 | 720 | 10,885 | 71.4% | 63.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 1.2 | 791 | 13,289 | 53.3% | 48.3% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 1.0 | 745 | 12,931 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 46.34% | 41 | 1.6 | 794 | 10,353 | 47.6% | 45.0% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 1.3 | 678 | 9,436 | 50.0% | 29.4% | |
| 50.00% | 40 | 1.4 | 669 | 10,393 | 40.0% | 56.0% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 0.8 | 702 | 11,739 | 61.1% | 38.1% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 0.9 | 680 | 12,353 | 52.9% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.1 | 774 | 14,068 | 41.7% | 54.5% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.0 | 731 | 14,212 | 30.0% | 50.0% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 1.4 | 740 | 10,138 | 33.3% | 36.8% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 1.5 | 734 | 12,871 | 14.3% | 60.0% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.4 | 692 | 9,800 | 47.1% | 41.2% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 1.4 | 761 | 10,037 | 53.3% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 33 | 1.3 | 708 | 9,775 | 80.0% | 55.6% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 1.1 | 652 | 12,195 | 58.3% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.4 | 805 | 11,567 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 44.83% | 29 | 0.7 | 660 | 11,193 | 41.2% | 50.0% | |
| 27.59% | 29 | 0.8 | 670 | 12,108 | 23.1% | 31.3% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 0.8 | 678 | 12,482 | 36.4% | 41.2% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 0.8 | 632 | 11,863 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 1.5 | 774 | 9,714 | 38.5% | 35.7% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.1 | 720 | 12,641 | 25.0% | 63.2% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 1.6 | 615 | 9,582 | 61.5% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 1.4 | 732 | 9,478 | 70.0% | 64.7% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 0.7 | 682 | 12,977 | 36.4% | 64.3% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.0 | 763 | 13,111 | 57.1% | 41.2% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 1.5 | 622 | 9,248 | 40.0% | 23.1% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 1.4 | 715 | 11,817 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.2 | 660 | 12,383 | 42.9% | 53.3% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 2.0 | 828 | 11,037 | 44.4% | 41.7% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.4 | 790 | 11,646 | 0.0% | 64.7% | |
| 71.43% | 21 | 1.5 | 687 | 10,596 | 71.4% | 71.4% | |
| 66.67% | 21 | 0.8 | 752 | 13,774 | 28.6% | 85.7% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 1.1 | 660 | 11,792 | 37.5% | 76.9% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.9 | 802 | 13,197 | 14.3% | 57.1% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.7 | 746 | 11,700 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.7 | 665 | 11,330 | 50.0% | 38.5% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.4 | 715 | 11,135 | 66.7% | 46.1% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 1.6 | 828 | 9,371 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 1.8 | 758 | 10,735 | 50.0% | 41.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.7 | 750 | 10,796 | 60.0% | 41.7% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.6 | 602 | 12,694 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 0.8 | 637 | 12,427 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.9 | 908 | 12,426 | 55.6% | 28.6% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.4 | 612 | 9,323 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.3 | 741 | 12,040 | 80.0% | 40.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 1.2 | 639 | 12,201 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.4 | 752 | 11,282 | 50.0% | 70.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.4 | 740 | 8,776 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.2 | 693 | 8,562 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.4 | 769 | 10,570 | 83.3% | 42.9% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 2.7 | 814 | 10,522 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 1.0 | 750 | 13,708 | 75.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 0.8 | 725 | 11,581 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.1 | 752 | 10,645 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 1.0 | 831 | 13,555 | 83.3% | 80.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.5 | 850 | 10,197 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.1 | 538 | 7,550 | 62.5% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 751 | 7,538 | 60.0% | 20.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.5 | 811 | 10,541 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.7 | 604 | 10,118 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.2 | 773 | 9,447 | 62.5% | 0.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.0 | 901 | 11,383 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.8 | 831 | 9,687 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.6 | 687 | 10,612 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.0 | 881 | 9,512 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.5 | 809 | 11,009 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 532 | 8,957 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.1 | 713 | 9,189 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.1 | 961 | 14,286 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 0.8 | 480 | 10,802 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 600 | 12,185 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 650 | 11,538 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 884 | 10,521 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 560 | 11,514 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，恶魔小丑对荆棘之兴表现如何？
恶魔小丑以51.9%的胜率赢得恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴的对决，而荆棘之兴为48.1%，相差3.7个百分点。该数据基于26.3版本的27场近期排位赛。
在前期，恶魔小丑对荆棘之兴表现如何？
在前期，荆棘之兴对恶魔小丑占有优势，胜率为75.0%对25.0%。荆棘之兴玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，恶魔小丑对荆棘之兴表现如何？
在后期，恶魔小丑以63.2%对36.8%的胜率主导恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴的对决。恶魔小丑在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴的对决？
恶魔小丑在英雄联盟26.3版本中以51.9%的胜率赢得对荆棘之兴的对决。3.7个百分点的优势意味着根据27场分析的比赛，恶魔小丑在这个线上对决中moderately占优。
对抗荆棘之兴的最佳恶魔小丑出装是什么？
对抗荆棘之兴的最佳恶魔小丑出装包括兰德里的折磨, 帝国指令, 蜕生 with 明朗之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗荆棘之兴的最佳恶魔小丑符文是什么？
对抗荆棘之兴的最佳恶魔小丑符文使用巫术主系和精密副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 恶魔小丑 vs 荆棘之兴 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
恶魔小丑克制荆棘之兴吗？
是的，恶魔小丑对荆棘之兴有利，胜率为51.9%。根据当前26.3版本数据，恶魔小丑在线上has a solid advantage over荆棘之兴。
如何用恶魔小丑对战荆棘之兴？
当恶魔小丑对战荆棘之兴时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform 荆棘之兴. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。