荆棘之兴对阵 破败之王
荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王在LoL版本26.11中是a decisive对线。荆棘之兴以56.3%胜率(+12.5%)击败破败之王，基于16场比赛。荆棘之兴 wins the early laning phase while 破败之王 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王对线的最佳荆棘之兴出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
荆棘之兴对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看荆棘之兴对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王对线谁赢？
荆棘之兴对战破败之王对决摘要
荆棘之兴对战破败之王在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据16场近期比赛的分析，荆棘之兴以56.3%的胜率获胜，相比破败之王的43.8%，给予荆棘之兴 12.5个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：荆棘之兴控制早期对线阶段，但破败之王在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——荆棘之兴需要在破败之王达到强势期之前压制优势，而破败之王应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在续航方面，破败之王领先736 HP/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 荆棘之兴玩家可以自信地选择对抗破败之王并从1级开始激进地游戏。尽早通过有利的换血建立线上统治权，并尽可能将破败之王从补刀中挤走。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
荆棘之兴对战破败之王对线阶段分析
荆棘之兴在对线阶段对阵破败之王时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。荆棘之兴在补刀, 伤害 和 控制技能方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 荆棘之兴 Build Against 破败之王
法师之靴是对抗破败之王的最佳鞋子选择，提供荆棘之兴在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 荆棘之兴对抗破败之王表现最好的核心装备是兰德里的折磨, 影焰 和 虚空之杖。这一组合给荆棘之兴提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在2场比赛中达到100.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗破败之王的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为荆棘之兴对战破败之王对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
荆棘之兴75.0%
破败之王25.0%荆棘之兴37.5%破败之王62.5%荆棘之兴以令人印象深刻的75.0%胜率主导前期（前15分钟）——领先破败之王 50.0个百分点。这一不平衡的前期意味着荆棘之兴可以从1级开始决定线上节奏，控制换血、兵线状态和河道优先权。
破败之王在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有62.5%胜率——比荆棘之兴高25.0点。长时间游戏强烈有利于破败之王，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
这场对决有戏剧性的力量转变：荆棘之兴必须积极压制早期优势并在破败之王达到成长节点之前结束游戏。如果破败之王在不太落后的情况下度过对线阶段，对决将倾向于他们。龙和峡谷先锋控制至关重要——确保早期目标的队伍可以滚雪球或争取时间成长。
Best 荆棘之兴 Runes Against 破败之王
巫术
精密
使用巫术主系配精密副系允许荆棘之兴压制对破败之王的优势，放大使这场对决有利的优势。
英雄联盟26.11版本荆棘之兴对线数据。下表显示荆棘之兴对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括荆棘之兴最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.03% | 246 | 1.9 | 739 | 9,693 | 55.3% | 49.6% | |
| 50.47% | 212 | 2.3 | 739 | 10,236 | 53.8% | 48.5% | |
| 53.13% | 160 | 1.9 | 769 | 9,628 | 52.9% | 53.3% | |
| 54.90% | 153 | 1.8 | 764 | 9,716 | 58.7% | 52.2% | |
| 52.00% | 150 | 1.9 | 773 | 9,689 | 57.4% | 48.3% | |
| 54.23% | 142 | 1.9 | 741 | 9,762 | 50.8% | 56.8% | |
| 56.30% | 135 | 1.9 | 791 | 10,116 | 61.9% | 53.8% | |
| 49.15% | 118 | 2.0 | 735 | 10,065 | 40.9% | 54.0% | |
| 41.38% | 116 | 2.2 | 796 | 10,923 | 33.3% | 44.6% | |
| 51.14% | 88 | 1.9 | 722 | 8,791 | 56.8% | 45.5% | |
| 51.90% | 79 | 2.0 | 738 | 10,230 | 53.9% | 50.9% | |
| 52.63% | 76 | 2.3 | 758 | 10,892 | 52.4% | 52.7% | |
| 50.00% | 74 | 1.8 | 711 | 9,701 | 53.6% | 47.8% | |
| 44.44% | 72 | 2.0 | 752 | 10,373 | 28.6% | 51.0% | |
| 40.91% | 66 | 1.8 | 719 | 9,859 | 59.1% | 31.8% | |
| 57.38% | 61 | 1.7 | 685 | 8,936 | 55.6% | 58.8% | |
| 52.63% | 57 | 2.2 | 889 | 10,446 | 47.4% | 55.3% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 2.0 | 956 | 10,133 | 61.1% | 51.3% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 1.9 | 610 | 9,439 | 52.2% | 44.1% | |
| 59.65% | 57 | 1.9 | 771 | 9,583 | 63.2% | 57.9% | |
| 58.93% | 56 | 2.3 | 763 | 10,483 | 64.3% | 57.1% | |
| 55.36% | 56 | 2.1 | 798 | 9,891 | 57.7% | 53.3% | |
| 46.30% | 54 | 1.8 | 785 | 9,916 | 60.0% | 38.2% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 2.2 | 771 | 9,812 | 47.6% | 53.6% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.8 | 788 | 9,904 | 56.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 1.9 | 811 | 9,762 | 62.5% | 42.3% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 1.9 | 771 | 10,094 | 41.2% | 75.0% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 2.0 | 705 | 9,583 | 47.4% | 61.9% | |
| 38.46% | 39 | 1.8 | 757 | 8,552 | 43.8% | 34.8% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 1.9 | 653 | 9,089 | 61.5% | 40.9% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 1.4 | 777 | 13,029 | 69.2% | 55.6% | |
| 33.33% | 27 | 1.8 | 779 | 12,114 | 50.0% | 26.3% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 4.5 | 955 | 10,867 | 12.5% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 1.9 | 866 | 9,329 | 40.0% | 56.3% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.7 | 837 | 12,262 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 2.2 | 859 | 11,028 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 1.9 | 763 | 10,712 | 33.3% | 64.7% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 3.6 | 814 | 11,547 | 22.2% | 69.2% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 1.6 | 880 | 12,354 | 54.5% | 45.5% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 3.0 | 767 | 11,138 | 66.7% | 46.7% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.6 | 926 | 13,061 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 23.81% | 21 | 5.6 | 684 | 10,186 | 33.3% | 11.1% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 2.6 | 696 | 7,834 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.0 | 969 | 10,980 | 55.6% | 45.5% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.9 | 790 | 10,600 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 683 | 12,012 | 33.3% | 72.7% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 1.6 | 781 | 9,643 | 33.3% | 61.5% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 2.5 | 794 | 11,594 | 60.0% | 53.9% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.2 | 791 | 12,372 | 60.0% | 61.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 2.0 | 659 | 10,047 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.2 | 929 | 12,970 | 75.0% | 37.5% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 2.0 | 788 | 10,664 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.0 | 1,026 | 11,573 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 2.2 | 614 | 8,164 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.5 | 965 | 10,671 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.0 | 757 | 11,293 | 71.4% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.8 | 787 | 10,941 | 42.9% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.7 | 805 | 11,028 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 0.9 | 755 | 10,469 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 1.9 | 844 | 12,069 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.6 | 970 | 13,188 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.2 | 1,007 | 13,283 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.9 | 704 | 9,908 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.0 | 970 | 12,538 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.9 | 956 | 9,654 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.4 | 801 | 12,132 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 3.1 | 877 | 11,167 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.9 | 854 | 11,622 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 1,076 | 13,077 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 2.3 | 1,047 | 12,576 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.5 | 893 | 10,942 | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.7 | 1,082 | 11,177 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.6 | 739 | 11,041 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.8 | 819 | 9,815 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 869 | 12,836 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 1,078 | 11,862 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.4 | 1,159 | 12,713 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.3 | 714 | 11,330 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.4 | 1,134 | 10,098 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 919 | 10,395 | 83.3% | 100.0% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 887 | 12,618 | 100.0% | 85.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.8 | 760 | 10,268 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 3.0 | 851 | 12,967 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.6 | 904 | 13,897 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.7 | 770 | 9,758 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.8 | 855 | 10,926 | 80.0% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.6 | 997 | 10,390 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.5 | 872 | 12,270 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 988 | 12,069 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.7 | 850 | 9,701 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 891 | 11,675 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 588 | 7,851 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 810 | 10,276 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.5 | 816 | 11,003 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.9 | 721 | 10,876 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 740 | 9,567 | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.5 | 905 | 14,080 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 1,030 | 14,428 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 973 | 10,407 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.2 | 757 | 9,950 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 712 | 12,315 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 871 | 9,300 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 681 | 11,716 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 869 | 10,113 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 649 | 11,046 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 899 | 10,839 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 773 | 12,010 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,010 | 9,810 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 1,166 | 8,751 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 695 | 11,395 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，荆棘之兴对破败之王表现如何？
荆棘之兴以56.3%的胜率赢得荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王的对决，而破败之王为43.8%，相差12.5个百分点。该数据基于26.11版本的16场近期排位赛。
在前期，荆棘之兴对破败之王表现如何？
在前期，荆棘之兴对破败之王占有优势，胜率为75.0%对25.0%。荆棘之兴玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，荆棘之兴对破败之王表现如何？
在后期，破败之王以62.5%对37.5%的胜率主导荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王的对决。破败之王在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王的对决？
荆棘之兴在英雄联盟26.11版本中以56.3%的胜率赢得对破败之王的对决。12.5个百分点的优势意味着根据16场分析的比赛，荆棘之兴在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗破败之王的最佳荆棘之兴出装是什么？
对抗破败之王的最佳荆棘之兴出装包括兰德里的折磨, 影焰, 虚空之杖 with 法师之靴。This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗破败之王的最佳荆棘之兴符文是什么？
对抗破败之王的最佳荆棘之兴符文使用巫术主系和精密副系。This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the 荆棘之兴 vs 破败之王 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
荆棘之兴克制破败之王吗？
是的，荆棘之兴对破败之王有利，胜率为56.3%。根据当前26.11版本数据，荆棘之兴在线上strongly counters破败之王。
如何用荆棘之兴对战破败之王？
当荆棘之兴对战破败之王时，利用你的统计优势在有利的窗口期积极换血。You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. 使用该对决专用的推荐装备和符文以获得最佳效果。