Höchste Siegrate TFT Team-Kompositionen

Diese Tabelle zeigt die TFT Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Siegraten und hilft dir, die erfolgreichsten Comps für den Rangaufstieg zu identifizieren. Top 9-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Herausforderer (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Schurke (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Schurke (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Herausforderer/Schurke führt mit 97.42% Siegesrate und 2.25 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 96.39% Siegesrate. Analyse von 62 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.25
Avg Place
97.42%
Top 4 Rate
31.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.06
Avg Place
96.39%
Top 4 Rate
39.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.08
Avg Place
95.88%
Top 4 Rate
37.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.17
Avg Place
95.67%
Top 4 Rate
34.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.99
Avg Place
94.82%
Top 4 Rate
42.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
94.75%
Top 4 Rate
37.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.07%
Top 4 Rate
37.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.43
Avg Place
92.56%
Top 4 Rate
29.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.36
Avg Place
92.29%
Top 4 Rate
30.35%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.41
Avg Place
91.99%
Top 4 Rate
30.04%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.66%
Top 4 Rate
26.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.32
Avg Place
89.49%
Top 4 Rate
39.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
88.33%
Top 4 Rate
28.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.40
Avg Place
87.58%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.44
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
39.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.73
Avg Place
86.01%
Top 4 Rate
27.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
85.26%
Top 4 Rate
30.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
83.85%
Top 4 Rate
25.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.84
Avg Place
83.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
81.98%
Top 4 Rate
16.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
81.06%
Top 4 Rate
17.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.14
Avg Place
80.24%
Top 4 Rate
18.76%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.82
Avg Place
80.15%
Top 4 Rate
37.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
79.64%
Top 4 Rate
23.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
79.45%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.13
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
18.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
78.77%
Top 4 Rate
29.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.16
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
20.56%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.98%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
77.94%
Top 4 Rate
26.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
77.78%
Top 4 Rate
27.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.37
Avg Place
75.92%
Top 4 Rate
16.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.39
Avg Place
74.82%
Top 4 Rate
19.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
23.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.30
Avg Place
74.25%
Top 4 Rate
19.77%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
71.84%
Top 4 Rate
16.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.56
Avg Place
70.89%
Top 4 Rate
14.41%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.50
Avg Place
69.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
23.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
67.92%
Top 4 Rate
20.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.38%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.74
Avg Place
66.70%
Top 4 Rate
11.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.83
Avg Place
66.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.70
Avg Place
66.30%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
65.47%
Top 4 Rate
7.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
64.80%
Top 4 Rate
17.51%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.95
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.35%
Top 4 Rate
7.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.90
Avg Place
59.24%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.32
Avg Place
56.96%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.26
Avg Place
56.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.32
Avg Place
55.03%
Top 4 Rate
8.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
54.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.43
Avg Place
49.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
49.74%
Top 4 Rate
3.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.86
Avg Place
43.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.85
Avg Place
42.51%
Top 4 Rate
7.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
41.14%
Top 4 Rate
6.69%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 62 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 74.6% and average placement of 3.27 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Herausforderer/Schurke with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 96.4% win rate, and Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 95.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Herausforderer/Schurke (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Schurke/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 42.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Schurke/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.99.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Herausforderer/Schurke: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 95.9% win rate with only 0.3% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikator/Sternenvernichter with a 1.4% pick rate, though its 66.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Gebieter/Replikator follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Herausforderer/Schurke mit Kai'Sa als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.4% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 2.25. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.

Wie spielt man die Herausforderer/Schurke-Komposition?

Um Herausforderer/Schurke zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Kai'Sa als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Kai'Sa und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Schurke/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.99. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.06) und Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.08). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?

Herausforderer/Schurke ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.4% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.

Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Replikator/Sternenvernichter eine Pickrate von 1.4%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie Herausforderer/Schurke zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.