Höchste Siegrate TFT Team-Kompositionen
Diese Tabelle zeigt die TFT Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Siegraten und hilft dir, die erfolgreichsten Comps für den Rangaufstieg zu identifizieren. Top 9-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Herausforderer (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Schurke (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Schurke (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Herausforderer/Schurke führt mit 97.42% Siegesrate und 2.25 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 96.39% Siegesrate. Analyse von 62 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.25 Avg Place | 97.42% Top 4 Rate | 31.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.06 Avg Place | 96.39% Top 4 Rate | 39.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.08 Avg Place | 95.88% Top 4 Rate | 37.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.17 Avg Place | 95.67% Top 4 Rate | 34.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.99 Avg Place | 94.82% Top 4 Rate | 42.42% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 94.75% Top 4 Rate | 37.37% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 94.07% Top 4 Rate | 37.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.43 Avg Place | 92.56% Top 4 Rate | 29.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.36 Avg Place | 92.29% Top 4 Rate | 30.35% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.41 Avg Place | 91.99% Top 4 Rate | 30.04% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.66% Top 4 Rate | 26.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.32 Avg Place | 89.49% Top 4 Rate | 39.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 88.33% Top 4 Rate | 28.02% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.40 Avg Place | 87.58% Top 4 Rate | 40.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.44 Avg Place | 87.13% Top 4 Rate | 39.82% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.73 Avg Place | 86.01% Top 4 Rate | 27.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.71 Avg Place | 85.26% Top 4 Rate | 30.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.97 Avg Place | 83.85% Top 4 Rate | 25.77% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 83.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.03 Avg Place | 81.98% Top 4 Rate | 16.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 81.06% Top 4 Rate | 17.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.14 Avg Place | 80.24% Top 4 Rate | 18.76% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.82 Avg Place | 80.15% Top 4 Rate | 37.13% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.03 Avg Place | 79.64% Top 4 Rate | 23.68% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 79.45% Top 4 Rate | 25.12% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 18.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 78.77% Top 4 Rate | 29.16% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.16 Avg Place | 78.50% Top 4 Rate | 20.56% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 78.42% Top 4 Rate | 21.98% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 77.94% Top 4 Rate | 26.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 77.78% Top 4 Rate | 27.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 77.15% Top 4 Rate | 25.22% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.37 Avg Place | 75.92% Top 4 Rate | 16.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 75.51% Top 4 Rate | 19.05% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.39 Avg Place | 74.82% Top 4 Rate | 19.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 74.27% Top 4 Rate | 23.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 74.25% Top 4 Rate | 19.77% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.49 Avg Place | 71.84% Top 4 Rate | 16.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.56 Avg Place | 70.89% Top 4 Rate | 14.41% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.50 Avg Place | 69.83% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 68.14% Top 4 Rate | 23.67% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 67.92% Top 4 Rate | 20.82% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.38% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.14% Top 4 Rate | 16.30% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 66.70% Top 4 Rate | 11.92% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 66.60% Top 4 Rate | 16.19% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.70 Avg Place | 66.30% Top 4 Rate | 20.65% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 65.47% Top 4 Rate | 7.82% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 64.80% Top 4 Rate | 17.51% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.95 Avg Place | 63.45% Top 4 Rate | 6.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.07 Avg Place | 59.35% Top 4 Rate | 7.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.90 Avg Place | 59.24% Top 4 Rate | 20.93% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.32 Avg Place | 56.96% Top 4 Rate | 6.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 56.43% Top 4 Rate | 4.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.32 Avg Place | 55.03% Top 4 Rate | 8.52% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 54.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 51.97% Top 4 Rate | 5.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 49.82% Top 4 Rate | 5.78% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.60 Avg Place | 49.74% Top 4 Rate | 3.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.86 Avg Place | 43.02% Top 4 Rate | 3.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.85 Avg Place | 42.51% Top 4 Rate | 7.58% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 41.14% Top 4 Rate | 6.69% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?
Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Herausforderer/Schurke mit Kai'Sa als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.4% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 2.25. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.
Wie spielt man die Herausforderer/Schurke-Komposition?
Um Herausforderer/Schurke zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Kai'Sa als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Kai'Sa und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.
Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?
Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Schurke/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.99. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.06) und Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.08). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.
Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?
Herausforderer/Schurke ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.4% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.
Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17 hat Replikator/Sternenvernichter eine Pickrate von 1.4%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie Herausforderer/Schurke zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.