Beste Durchschnittsplatzierung TFT Team-Kompositionen

Diese Tabelle ordnet TFT Team-Kompositionen nach ihrer durchschnittlichen Platzierung und zeigt, welche Comps konstant Top-Platzierungen erreichen. Top 9-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Replikator (97.0% WR, 1.8 avg), N.O.V.A. (91.0% WR, 2.0 avg), Sternenvernichter (91.5% WR, 2.1 avg). Replikator/N.O.V.A. führt mit 96.97% Siegesrate und 1.80 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. N.O.V.A. folgt mit 91.00% Siegesrate. Analyse von 69 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Replikator/N.O.V.A. with Milio as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 95.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Replikator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Milio
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Briar

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Replikator/N.O.V.A.: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Meeple/Schicksalsweber with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Replikator/N.O.V.A. mit Milio als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.80. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.

Wie spielt man die Replikator/N.O.V.A.-Komposition?

Um Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Milio als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Milio und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Replikator/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.80. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin (Ø 1.98) und Sternenvernichter/Raufbold (Ø 2.14). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?

Replikator/N.O.V.A. ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.

Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Meeple/Schicksalsweber eine Pickrate von 1.5%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.

Was ist die konstanteste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Replikator/N.O.V.A. hat die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.80, was sie zur konstantesten Komposition zum Klettern macht. N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin folgt mit 1.98, und Sternenvernichter/Raufbold mit 2.14. Niedrigere durchschnittliche Platzierung bedeutet weniger Bottom-4-Platzierungen.

Ist durchschnittliche Platzierung besser als Siegrate zum Klettern?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne ist durchschnittliche Platzierung oft zuverlässiger als reine Siegrate. Eine Komposition wie Replikator/N.O.V.A. mit 1.80 durchschnittlicher Platzierung minimiert große LP-Verluste durch Bottom-4-Platzierungen. Kompositionen mit hoher Varianz gewinnen vielleicht mehr Lobbies, werden aber auch öfter 8. Zum Klettern schlägt Konstanz meist Gambling-Strategien.