Beliebteste TFT Team-Kompositionen
Diese Tabelle zeigt die am häufigsten gespielten TFT Team-Kompositionen basierend auf der Pickrate und zeigt aktuelle Meta-Trends und beliebte Strategien. Top 9-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Sternenvernichter (66.9% WR, 3.8 avg), Schurke (79.3% WR, 3.0 avg), Sternenvernichter (65.1% WR, 3.7 avg). Sternenvernichter/Wanderer führt mit 66.95% Siegesrate und 3.75 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 79.29% Siegesrate. Analyse von 69 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.01 Avg Place | 19.83% Top 4 Rate | 2.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 71.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 36.36% Top 4 Rate | 3.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.75 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.76 Avg Place | 44.20% Top 4 Rate | 6.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.29 Avg Place | 33.61% Top 4 Rate | 2.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.63 Avg Place | 48.61% Top 4 Rate | 3.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.73% Top 4 Rate | 6.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.94 Avg Place | 64.09% Top 4 Rate | 5.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.08% Top 4 Rate | 10.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 44.05% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.45 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.17% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.34 Avg Place | 54.48% Top 4 Rate | 6.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 61.02% Top 4 Rate | 6.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?
Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Replikator/N.O.V.A. mit Milio als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.80. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.
Wie spielt man die Replikator/N.O.V.A.-Komposition?
Um Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Milio als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Milio und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.
Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?
Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Replikator/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.80. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin (Ø 1.98) und Sternenvernichter/Raufbold (Ø 2.14). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.
Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?
Replikator/N.O.V.A. ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.
Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17 hat Meeple/Schicksalsweber eine Pickrate von 1.5%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.
Was ist das aktuelle TFT-Meta in TFT Set 17?
Das TFT Set 17 Meta wird von Meeple/Schicksalsweber mit 1.5% Pickrate dominiert, gefolgt von Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. mit 0.9%. Kompositionen mit hoher Pickrate definieren das Meta, sind aber oft umkämpft. Für unumkämpfte Spiele erwäge weniger beliebte Alternativen wie Herausforderer/Schurke (0.1% Pickrate).
Sollte man beliebte Kompositionen in TFT meiden?
Nicht unbedingt. Beliebte Kompositionen wie Meeple/Schicksalsweber (1.5% Pickrate) sind aus gutem Grund beliebt — sie sind stark. Wenn jedoch mehrere Spieler dieselbe Komposition forcieren, leidet die Platzierung aller. Scoute dein Lobby früh. Wenn 2+ Spieler dieselbe Komposition forcieren, pivote zu Alternativen, um den Kampf um Einheiten zu vermeiden.