Top Erste-Platz-Rate TFT Team-Kompositionen

Diese Tabelle hebt TFT Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Erste-Platz-Raten hervor, perfekt für Spieler, die ihre Gewinnchancen maximieren wollen. Top double-up-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Partytiger (96.0% WR, 1.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (91.0% WR, 2.0 avg), Schurke (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg). Partytiger/N.O.V.A. führt mit 96.03% Siegesrate und 1.62 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. N.O.V.A. folgt mit 91.00% Siegesrate. Analyse von 100 double-up-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.20
Avg Place
55.44%
Top 4 Rate
12.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.62
Avg Place
45.77%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
54.00%
Top 4 Rate
10.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 105.1K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 78.7% and average placement of 3.07 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. with Master Yi as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/Meeple at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Master Yi
  • Schurke/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Bard
  • N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kindred

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Partytiger/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Partytiger/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Herausforderer/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/Meeple: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikator/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Partytiger/Sternenvernichter follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. mit Master Yi als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 99.3% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.71. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.

Wie spielt man die Herausforderer/N.O.V.A.-Komposition?

Um Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Master Yi als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Master Yi und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet Partytiger/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.62. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind Schurke/Meeple (Ø 1.66) und Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. (Ø 1.71). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?

Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 99.3% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.

Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Replikator/N.O.V.A. eine Pickrate von 1.9%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.

Welche TFT-Komposition gewinnt am häufigsten Lobbies in TFT Set 17?

Partytiger/N.O.V.A. erreicht in 66.4% der Spiele den ersten Platz, was sie zur besten Komposition macht, um Lobbies komplett zu gewinnen. N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin folgt mit 57.7% Erstplatzierungsrate. Wenn dein Ziel Siegen statt nur Top 4 ist, priorisiere diese High-Ceiling-Kompositionen.

Wann sollte man auf Platz 1 vs. Top 4 spielen?

Spiele auf Platz 1, wenn du eine High-Ceiling-Komposition wie Partytiger/N.O.V.A. (66.4% Erstplatzierungsrate) hast und deinen Power Spike mit optimalen Items erreichst. Spiele auf Top 4, wenn du umkämpft bist, suboptimale Items hast oder LP bewahren musst. In Ranked steigen konstante Top 4 oft schneller als das Gambling auf Platz 1.