- Avg Place
- 4.30
- 1st Place
- 12.36%
- Top 4 Rate
- 54.11%
Ravager Emblem TFT Team Comps
Frying Pan
Negatron Cloak- Set
- 18
- Matches
- 640,518
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 6, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Ravager Emblem in TFT Set 16.19. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Ravager Emblem as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 39 viable team comps currently building Ravager Emblem, with an average win rate of 55.77% across all compositions. The highest performing Ravager Emblem comp achieves a 80.35% win rate, primarily featuring Defender, DA_18_Eclipse, Inferno traits with Aphelios as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Ravager Emblem is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.97 | Top 4 80.35% | First Place 20.23% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.87 | Top 4 79.70% | First Place 24.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.18 | Top 4 77.88% | First Place 19.35% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 76.30% | First Place 26.60% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.16 | Top 4 75.69% | First Place 21.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 74.13% | First Place 20.28% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 73.84% | First Place 22.62% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.39 | Top 4 73.75% | First Place 15.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.17 | Top 4 72.79% | First Place 29.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 71.83% | First Place 18.03% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 70.54% | First Place 11.88% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.63 | Top 4 69.90% | First Place 9.22% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.64 | Top 4 69.18% | First Place 10.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 69.09% | First Place 32.08% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 67.25% | First Place 9.85% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.95 | Top 4 64.99% | First Place 4.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 64.14% | First Place 17.97% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 60.77% | First Place 10.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 59.62% | First Place 9.66% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.46 | Top 4 51.83% | First Place 6.48% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.54 | Top 4 50.26% | First Place 3.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.56 | Top 4 49.37% | First Place 6.06% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.58 | Top 4 48.07% | First Place 7.34% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.64 | Top 4 47.63% | First Place 7.51% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.77 | Top 4 46.89% | First Place 4.11% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.66 | Top 4 46.50% | First Place 4.58% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.76 | Top 4 46.45% | First Place 4.37% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.70 | Top 4 44.93% | First Place 7.20% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.83 | Top 4 42.56% | First Place 3.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.89 | Top 4 41.81% | First Place 4.86% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.94 | Top 4 40.76% | First Place 3.42% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.15 | Top 4 39.65% | First Place 4.48% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.12 | Top 4 37.44% | First Place 2.36% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.16 | Top 4 37.10% | First Place 3.53% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 35.35% | First Place 4.83% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 32.82% | First Place 2.60% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.50 | Top 4 29.20% | First Place 2.69% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.71 | Top 4 27.37% | First Place 3.58% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.59 | Top 4 27.23% | First Place 1.98% | High Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ravager Emblem Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Ravager Emblem in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Ravager Emblem in TFT Set 18 achieves a 80.35% win rate with a 0.10% pick rate. This composition uses Defender, DA_18_Eclipse, and Inferno traits and is picked in 0.10% of games featuring Ravager Emblem.
How many team comps use Ravager Emblem in TFT?
There are 39 viable team compositions that commonly build Ravager Emblem in TFT Set 18. Ravager Emblem appears in comps with an average win rate of 55.77% across 51,900 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Ravager Emblem most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Ravager Emblem in TFT Set 18 uses the Adaptor, Inferno, and Invoker traits with a 3.01% pick rate. This composition achieves a 49.37% win rate and average placement of 4.56.
What comp with Ravager Emblem has the best average placement?
The Ravager Emblem comp with the best average placement achieves 2.87 with the Defender, DA_18_Eclipse, and Inferno traits. This composition has a 79.70% win rate and 0.06% pick rate.
What traits work well with Ravager Emblem in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Ravager Emblem in TFT Set 18 are Defender, DA_18_Eclipse, Inferno, Lunar, Rapidfire, Solar, and Attuned. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Ravager Emblem team compositions.