Highest Win Rate TFT Double Up Compositions
This table showcases the TFT Double Up team compositions with the highest win rates, helping you and your partner identify the most successful comps for climbing ranked. Top 8-champion Double Up Set 17 compositions: N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler leads with 74.19% win rate and 3.37 average placement. N.O.V.A. follows at 67.65% win rate. Analyzing 68 8-comp Double Up compositions with real-time performance statistics.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.37 Avg Place | 74.19% Top 4 Rate | 24.19% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.53 Avg Place | 67.65% Top 4 Rate | 12.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 63.83% Top 4 Rate | 8.51% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.69 Avg Place | 58.06% Top 4 Rate | 19.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 67.57% Top 4 Rate | 21.62% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 58.33% Top 4 Rate | 11.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.65 Avg Place | 62.97% Top 4 Rate | 21.20% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.91 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 18.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 33.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.02 Avg Place | 59.09% Top 4 Rate | 13.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.05 Avg Place | 58.62% Top 4 Rate | 11.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 69.77% Top 4 Rate | 16.28% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 58.46% Top 4 Rate | 15.38% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 62.45% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.08 Avg Place | 57.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.89 Avg Place | 56.88% Top 4 Rate | 16.88% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.84 Avg Place | 55.97% Top 4 Rate | 18.66% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 37.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.25% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.89 Avg Place | 61.63% Top 4 Rate | 15.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.99 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 14.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.44 Avg Place | 49.02% Top 4 Rate | 10.83% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.17% Top 4 Rate | 10.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 42.42% Top 4 Rate | 3.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.00 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 17.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.31 Avg Place | 49.20% Top 4 Rate | 16.04% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 47.80% Top 4 Rate | 8.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.24 Avg Place | 54.45% Top 4 Rate | 10.68% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.68 Avg Place | 46.77% Top 4 Rate | 6.45% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.44 Avg Place | 46.67% Top 4 Rate | 15.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.59 Avg Place | 48.87% Top 4 Rate | 11.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.77 Avg Place | 45.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.39% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.36 Avg Place | 52.17% Top 4 Rate | 15.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 46.15% Top 4 Rate | 10.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.69 Avg Place | 45.24% Top 4 Rate | 16.67% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.80 Avg Place | 40.96% Top 4 Rate | 9.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.00 Avg Place | 32.35% Top 4 Rate | 8.82% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.14 Avg Place | 57.14% Top 4 Rate | 19.05% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.22 Avg Place | 33.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.73 Avg Place | 47.13% Top 4 Rate | 8.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.71 Avg Place | 44.12% Top 4 Rate | 8.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.63 Avg Place | 36.84% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
- | 5.18 Avg Place | 32.97% Top 4 Rate | 7.14% First Place | Moderately Contested | |||
4.81 Avg Place | 37.21% Top 4 Rate | 13.95% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 62.50% Top 4 Rate | 19.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 39.39% Top 4 Rate | 9.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 25.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.95% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.03 Avg Place | 36.21% Top 4 Rate | 8.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 8.33% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.21 Avg Place | 34.15% Top 4 Rate | 9.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.37 Avg Place | 32.61% Top 4 Rate | 8.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.30 Avg Place | 32.54% Top 4 Rate | 7.69% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.23 Avg Place | 32.14% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.83 Avg Place | 18.75% Top 4 Rate | 4.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.95 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.24 Avg Place | 29.41% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.36 Avg Place | 28.57% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 28.26% Top 4 Rate | 4.35% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.40 Avg Place | 27.91% Top 4 Rate | 9.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.57 Avg Place | 29.13% Top 4 Rate | 4.85% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.87 Avg Place | 23.38% Top 4 Rate | 7.79% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.49 Avg Place | 26.38% Top 4 Rate | 5.51% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.57 Avg Place | 28.57% Top 4 Rate | 2.86% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.87 Avg Place | 19.49% Top 4 Rate | 4.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 25.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.23% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
6.22 Avg Place | 12.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.17% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
TFT Double Up Comps - Set 17 FAQ
What is the best TFT Double Up comp in TFT Set 17?
The best TFT Double Up comp in TFT Set 17 is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate and 3.37 average placement. This composition is effective for climbing ranked with a partner.
How do I play the N.O.V.A./Brawler comp in Double Up?
To play N.O.V.A./Brawler in Double Up, coordinate with your partner. Focus on building around Viktor as your main carry. This comp has a 0.1% pick rate, making it a relatively uncontested option. Coordinate assists and shared items with your duo partner for best results.
What Double Up comps are good for climbing in TFT Set 17?
For consistent LP gains in TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler offers the best average placement at 3.37. Other reliable options include Replicator/N.O.V.A. (3.51 avg) and Rogue/N.O.V.A. (3.51 avg). Coordinate with your partner to avoid contesting each other.
What is the easiest TFT Double Up comp to play?
N.O.V.A./Brawler is a great option for players looking for an easier climb. With a 74.2% win rate but only 0.1% pick rate, you're unlikely to be contested, making the game easier to navigate. Low contestation means you can naturally find your units without having to force pivots.
Should my duo partner and I play the same comp in Double Up?
In TFT Set 17 Double Up, it is generally better to play different comps to avoid contesting units. Rogue/N.O.V.A. is the most popular at 2.1% pick rate. Consider having your partner play N.O.V.A./Brawler as a complementary option.