- Avg Place
- 4.14
- 1st Place
- 17.47%
- Top 4 Rate
- 56.32%
Gold Collector TFT Team Comps
- Set
- 18
- Matches
- 565,576
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 7, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Gold Collector in TFT Set 16.20. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Gold Collector as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 37 viable team comps currently building Gold Collector, with an average win rate of 59.88% across all compositions. The highest performing Gold Collector comp achieves a 82.19% win rate, primarily featuring Defender, Elderwood, Lunar traits with Fiddlesticks as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Gold Collector is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.83 | Top 4 82.19% | First Place 29.11% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.87 | Top 4 79.77% | First Place 23.98% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.18 | Top 4 77.92% | First Place 19.31% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 76.33% | First Place 26.64% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 76.04% | First Place 13.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 74.13% | First Place 20.28% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.39 | Top 4 73.75% | First Place 15.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.17 | Top 4 72.79% | First Place 29.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 72.03% | First Place 15.37% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.47 | Top 4 71.92% | First Place 10.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 71.47% | First Place 8.01% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 70.58% | First Place 11.86% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.63 | Top 4 69.89% | First Place 9.18% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.64 | Top 4 69.19% | First Place 10.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 69.03% | First Place 31.99% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.74 | Top 4 67.48% | First Place 6.56% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 67.25% | First Place 9.98% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.95 | Top 4 64.99% | First Place 4.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 64.14% | First Place 17.97% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 61.09% | First Place 9.04% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.04 | Top 4 60.66% | First Place 4.35% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.99 | Top 4 59.92% | First Place 11.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 59.73% | First Place 9.64% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.46 | Top 4 51.82% | First Place 6.48% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.54 | Top 4 50.26% | First Place 3.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.58 | Top 4 48.07% | First Place 7.32% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.77 | Top 4 46.89% | First Place 4.11% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.80 | Top 4 46.63% | First Place 4.35% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.63 | Top 4 46.63% | First Place 5.95% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.75 | Top 4 46.53% | First Place 4.51% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.70 | Top 4 44.94% | First Place 7.18% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.84 | Top 4 42.45% | First Place 3.75% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.93 | Top 4 40.86% | First Place 3.41% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.11 | Top 4 37.53% | First Place 2.35% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 35.19% | First Place 4.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.35 | Top 4 33.24% | First Place 3.33% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.43 | Top 4 32.36% | First Place 1.89% | High Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Gold Collector Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Gold Collector in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Gold Collector in TFT Set 18 achieves a 82.19% win rate with a 0.66% pick rate. This composition uses Defender, Elderwood, and Lunar traits and is picked in 0.66% of games featuring Gold Collector.
How many team comps use Gold Collector in TFT?
There are 37 viable team compositions that commonly build Gold Collector in TFT Set 18. Gold Collector appears in comps with an average win rate of 59.88% across 33,075 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Gold Collector most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Gold Collector in TFT Set 18 uses the Defender, Elderwood, and Lunar traits with a 1.04% pick rate. This composition achieves a 76.33% win rate and average placement of 3.10.
What traits work well with Gold Collector in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Gold Collector in TFT Set 18 are Defender, Elderwood, Lunar, Rival, Executioner, Ravager, Spellweaver, Vanguard, Flora Fatalis, and Attuned. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Gold Collector team compositions.