- Avg Place
- 4.32
- 1st Place
- 12.93%
- Top 4 Rate
- 53.63%
Mittens TFT Team Comps
- Set
- 18
- Matches
- 640,518
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 6, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Mittens in TFT Set 16.19. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Mittens as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 36 viable team comps currently building Mittens, with an average win rate of 58.48% across all compositions. The highest performing Mittens comp achieves a 82.17% win rate, primarily featuring Defender, Elderwood, Lunar traits with Diana as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Mittens is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.83 | Top 4 82.17% | First Place 29.07% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.97 | Top 4 80.35% | First Place 20.23% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.18 | Top 4 77.88% | First Place 19.35% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 76.30% | First Place 26.60% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 76.26% | First Place 13.47% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 75.23% | First Place 19.44% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.17 | Top 4 72.79% | First Place 29.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.46 | Top 4 72.16% | First Place 15.40% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.47 | Top 4 71.92% | First Place 10.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 71.83% | First Place 18.03% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.58 | Top 4 71.47% | First Place 8.01% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.44 | Top 4 70.05% | First Place 19.56% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.63 | Top 4 69.90% | First Place 9.22% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.64 | Top 4 69.18% | First Place 10.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 69.09% | First Place 32.08% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.73 | Top 4 67.65% | First Place 6.57% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.95 | Top 4 64.99% | First Place 4.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 64.14% | First Place 17.97% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.74 | Top 4 64.08% | First Place 14.63% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 60.77% | First Place 10.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.98 | Top 4 60.07% | First Place 11.31% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 59.62% | First Place 9.66% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.29 | Top 4 55.42% | First Place 4.75% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.54 | Top 4 50.26% | First Place 3.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.77 | Top 4 46.89% | First Place 4.11% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.63 | Top 4 46.63% | First Place 5.95% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.70 | Top 4 44.93% | First Place 7.20% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.83 | Top 4 42.56% | First Place 3.76% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.94 | Top 4 40.76% | First Place 3.42% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.12 | Top 4 37.44% | First Place 2.36% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.16 | Top 4 37.10% | First Place 3.53% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 35.35% | First Place 4.83% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 34.99% | First Place 2.91% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 32.82% | First Place 2.60% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.50 | Top 4 29.20% | First Place 2.69% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.87 | Top 4 23.01% | First Place 0.90% | High Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Mittens Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Mittens in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Mittens in TFT Set 18 achieves a 82.17% win rate with a 0.66% pick rate. This composition uses Defender, Elderwood, and Lunar traits and is picked in 0.66% of games featuring Mittens.
How many team comps use Mittens in TFT?
There are 36 viable team compositions that commonly build Mittens in TFT Set 18. Mittens appears in comps with an average win rate of 58.48% across 35,572 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Mittens most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Mittens in TFT Set 18 uses the Defender, Elderwood, and Lunar traits with a 1.04% pick rate. This composition achieves a 76.30% win rate and average placement of 3.10.
What traits work well with Mittens in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Mittens in TFT Set 18 are Defender, Elderwood, Lunar, Rival, Executioner, Ravager, Spellweaver, Vanguard, Flora Fatalis, and Attuned. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Mittens team compositions.