Quinnvs Karma
Quinn vs Karma is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Karma wins with a 83.3% win rate (+66.7%) over Quinn based on 6 games. Karma holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Quinn vs Karma matchup.
Quinn Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Quinn performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Karma(16.7%)Who Wins the Quinn vs Karma Matchup?
Quinn vs Karma Matchup Summary
The Quinn vs Karma matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Karma wins with a 83.3% win rate compared to Quinn's 16.7%, giving Karma a 66.7 percentage point advantage. Karma dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Quinn players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Karma leads by 124 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Karma has a strong advantage in this matchup. Quinn players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Karma overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Quinn vs Karma Laning Phase Breakdown
Quinn is favored during the laning phase against Karma, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Quinn holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Quinn Build Against Karma
Gluttonous Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Karma, providing the mobility and stats Quinn needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Quinn against Karma are Voltaic Cyclosword, Eclipse and Youmuu's Ghostblade. This combination gives Quinn an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Karma. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Quinn vs Karma matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Quinn0.0%Karma100.0%Quinn33.3%Karma66.7%Karma dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Quinn. This lopsided early game means Karma can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Karma is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Quinn. Extended games heavily favor Karma, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Karma holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Quinn players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Quinn Runes Against Karma
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Quinn the best tools to compete against Karma in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Quinn matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Quinn's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.60% | 125 | 4.8 | 717 | 11,206 | 38.3% | 44.6% | |
| 49.60% | 125 | 1.4 | 790 | 13,098 | 47.3% | 51.4% | |
| 38.21% | 123 | 1.3 | 734 | 12,825 | 35.2% | 40.6% | |
| 40.34% | 119 | 1.1 | 825 | 13,343 | 38.8% | 41.4% | |
| 46.32% | 95 | 5.8 | 1,007 | 12,573 | 48.7% | 44.6% | |
| 37.23% | 94 | 1.1 | 742 | 12,744 | 43.9% | 32.1% | |
| 43.48% | 92 | 1.2 | 713 | 13,283 | 36.1% | 48.2% | |
| 44.57% | 92 | 1.3 | 841 | 13,533 | 40.5% | 47.3% | |
| 48.89% | 90 | 1.0 | 803 | 13,667 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 48.86% | 88 | 1.1 | 800 | 13,187 | 47.6% | 50.0% | |
| 46.91% | 81 | 5.5 | 870 | 12,404 | 42.3% | 49.1% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 1.8 | 771 | 13,152 | 35.7% | 59.6% | |
| 49.33% | 75 | 3.8 | 837 | 12,396 | 41.4% | 54.4% | |
| 40.58% | 69 | 1.1 | 736 | 12,924 | 28.6% | 48.8% | |
| 36.76% | 68 | 4.8 | 598 | 10,632 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 4.8 | 789 | 11,857 | 58.6% | 39.5% | |
| 37.50% | 64 | 2.1 | 864 | 13,137 | 21.4% | 50.0% | |
| 57.81% | 64 | 5.0 | 1,019 | 12,899 | 53.6% | 61.1% | |
| 38.10% | 63 | 3.0 | 834 | 13,007 | 50.0% | 29.7% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 1.6 | 810 | 14,007 | 55.0% | 46.9% | |
| 46.15% | 52 | 3.0 | 785 | 11,508 | 45.2% | 47.6% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 1.0 | 791 | 13,236 | 45.5% | 41.4% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 5.3 | 950 | 13,234 | 64.7% | 43.8% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 1.6 | 871 | 14,107 | 50.0% | 40.7% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 2.2 | 828 | 12,229 | 27.3% | 48.0% | |
| 36.96% | 46 | 1.1 | 719 | 13,104 | 46.7% | 32.3% | |
| 32.61% | 46 | 4.2 | 1,036 | 12,500 | 29.4% | 34.5% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 1.9 | 884 | 13,731 | 47.6% | 58.3% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 5.2 | 988 | 11,164 | 30.4% | 59.1% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 5.2 | 700 | 10,260 | 40.7% | 41.2% | |
| 43.18% | 44 | 1.5 | 688 | 11,193 | 46.1% | 38.9% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 5.9 | 905 | 12,488 | 43.8% | 46.4% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 5.5 | 902 | 13,013 | 62.5% | 51.9% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 2.3 | 791 | 13,232 | 30.8% | 43.3% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 1.1 | 808 | 14,079 | 53.9% | 46.7% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 5.6 | 1,020 | 13,266 | 28.6% | 46.4% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 5.7 | 871 | 12,449 | 53.3% | 59.3% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 5.3 | 901 | 11,782 | 50.0% | 59.1% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 5.6 | 963 | 12,822 | 61.5% | 53.6% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 1.2 | 767 | 14,065 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 65.85% | 41 | 3.0 | 833 | 12,956 | 73.3% | 61.5% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 3.3 | 891 | 14,875 | 33.3% | 73.1% | |
| 35.00% | 40 | 1.4 | 719 | 12,174 | 25.0% | 45.0% | |
| 58.97% | 39 | 3.5 | 833 | 13,430 | 64.3% | 56.0% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 5.6 | 941 | 13,399 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 5.7 | 792 | 12,812 | 60.0% | 31.8% | |
| 32.43% | 37 | 5.2 | 840 | 12,214 | 26.7% | 36.4% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 5.8 | 819 | 11,716 | 57.1% | 60.9% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 6.3 | 918 | 11,867 | 52.6% | 76.5% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 5.6 | 999 | 14,508 | 63.6% | 64.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 4.0 | 965 | 13,061 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 6.0 | 981 | 13,459 | 35.7% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.1 | 893 | 13,510 | 46.1% | 40.9% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 1.1 | 777 | 12,568 | 18.2% | 43.5% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.0 | 920 | 12,116 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 5.5 | 752 | 11,022 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 6.0 | 1,048 | 12,820 | 23.1% | 63.2% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 0.8 | 811 | 11,554 | 35.7% | 50.0% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.3 | 642 | 13,773 | 62.5% | 39.1% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 4.7 | 977 | 12,444 | 38.5% | 70.6% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 4.1 | 793 | 11,119 | 64.3% | 46.7% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 5.6 | 909 | 13,055 | 41.7% | 68.8% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 5.1 | 815 | 10,823 | 21.4% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 0.9 | 713 | 11,343 | 50.0% | 35.7% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 4.9 | 1,056 | 12,073 | 25.0% | 53.3% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 5.6 | 1,039 | 12,246 | 72.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 6.0 | 834 | 13,511 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 4.3 | 793 | 11,395 | 18.2% | 40.0% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 4.5 | 832 | 11,135 | 66.7% | 64.3% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.6 | 722 | 12,725 | 42.9% | 47.1% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 1.1 | 721 | 12,634 | 23.1% | 44.4% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.2 | 975 | 13,512 | 62.5% | 46.1% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 1,031 | 13,808 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.4 | 904 | 11,765 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 0.9 | 765 | 12,023 | 30.8% | 28.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 4.3 | 946 | 12,771 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 802 | 10,092 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.4 | 938 | 13,794 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.8 | 973 | 13,315 | 14.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.7 | 925 | 11,687 | 42.9% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 4.3 | 902 | 14,644 | 66.7% | 46.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 1.0 | 660 | 10,894 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.3 | 710 | 12,137 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 4.5 | 863 | 12,852 | 33.3% | 22.2% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 0.8 | 603 | 11,716 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.6 | 862 | 13,818 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.1 | 830 | 14,033 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 1.7 | 844 | 13,678 | 50.0% | 18.2% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 4.7 | 813 | 12,067 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.9 | 874 | 11,644 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.2 | 719 | 13,774 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.0 | 931 | 13,342 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 86.67% | 15 | 5.3 | 954 | 14,797 | 75.0% | 90.9% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.7 | 863 | 12,612 | 28.6% | 28.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.1 | 763 | 13,623 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 4.2 | 737 | 11,569 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.4 | 680 | 14,269 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 6.6 | 889 | 11,692 | 33.3% | 14.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 2.6 | 679 | 10,274 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.7 | 939 | 12,191 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.8 | 580 | 10,133 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.4 | 909 | 12,922 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.3 | 801 | 11,628 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.9 | 981 | 14,180 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.3 | 715 | 10,273 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 618 | 9,786 | 16.7% | 25.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 915 | 12,380 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 807 | 13,177 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 852 | 15,388 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.8 | 871 | 11,710 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 779 | 11,628 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.0 | 624 | 10,608 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.9 | 612 | 9,139 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.6 | 952 | 12,053 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.6 | 838 | 11,974 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 792 | 11,170 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 934 | 14,657 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 822 | 12,726 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.0 | 780 | 13,258 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.5 | 826 | 12,618 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.1 | 738 | 12,064 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 5.5 | 742 | 10,641 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 823 | 11,784 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.6 | 766 | 14,010 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 569 | 6,521 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 660 | 13,487 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.4 | 716 | 12,423 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.6 | 594 | 10,595 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,029 | 11,746 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 890 | 12,649 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 779 | 9,853 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 803 | 13,142 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 594 | 8,090 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 929 | 12,135 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 1,148 | 14,967 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 784 | 12,574 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 802 | 14,927 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Quinn vs Karma - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Quinn do against Karma in League of Legends?
Karma wins the Quinn vs Karma matchup with a 83.3% win rate compared to Quinn's 16.7%, a 66.7 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Quinn do against Karma in the early game?
In the early game, Karma has the advantage against Quinn with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Karma players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Quinn do against Karma in the late game?
In the late game, Karma takes over the Quinn vs Karma matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Karma scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Quinn vs Karma matchup?
Karma wins the matchup against Quinn with a 83.3% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 66.7 percentage point advantage means Karma is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Quinn build against Karma?
The best Quinn build against Karma includes Voltaic Cyclosword, Eclipse, Youmuu's Ghostblade with Gluttonous Greaves. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Quinn runes against Karma?
The best Quinn runes against Karma use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Quinn vs Karma matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Quinn counter Karma?
No, Quinn struggles against Karma with only a 16.7% win rate. Karma has the advantage in this matchup. Quinn players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Karma's lead.
How do I play Quinn against Karma?
When playing Quinn against Karma, play cautiously and avoid Karma's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Karma has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.