Quinnvs Samira
Quinn vs Samira is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Samira wins with a 80.0% win rate (+60.0%) over Quinn based on 5 games. Samira holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Quinn vs Samira matchup.
Quinn Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Quinn performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Samira(20.0%)Who Wins the Quinn vs Samira Matchup?
Quinn vs Samira Matchup Summary
The Quinn vs Samira matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Samira wins with a 80.0% win rate compared to Quinn's 20.0%, giving Samira a 60.0 percentage point advantage. Samira dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Quinn players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Quinn leads by 0.8s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Samira has a strong advantage in this matchup. Quinn players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Samira overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Quinn vs Samira Laning Phase Breakdown
Samira is favored during the laning phase against Quinn, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Samira holds advantages in farming, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Quinn25.0%Samira75.0%Quinn0.0%Samira100.0%Samira dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 75.0% win rate — a 50.0 percentage point lead over Quinn. This lopsided early game means Samira can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Samira is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Quinn. Extended games heavily favor Samira, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Samira holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Quinn players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Quinn Runes Against Samira
Precision
Domination
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Quinn the best tools to compete against Samira in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Quinn matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Quinn's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.60% | 125 | 4.8 | 717 | 11,206 | 38.3% | 44.6% | |
| 49.60% | 125 | 1.4 | 790 | 13,098 | 47.3% | 51.4% | |
| 38.21% | 123 | 1.3 | 734 | 12,825 | 35.2% | 40.6% | |
| 40.34% | 119 | 1.1 | 825 | 13,343 | 38.8% | 41.4% | |
| 46.32% | 95 | 5.8 | 1,007 | 12,573 | 48.7% | 44.6% | |
| 37.23% | 94 | 1.1 | 742 | 12,744 | 43.9% | 32.1% | |
| 43.48% | 92 | 1.2 | 713 | 13,283 | 36.1% | 48.2% | |
| 44.57% | 92 | 1.3 | 841 | 13,533 | 40.5% | 47.3% | |
| 48.89% | 90 | 1.0 | 803 | 13,667 | 40.0% | 54.5% | |
| 48.86% | 88 | 1.1 | 800 | 13,187 | 47.6% | 50.0% | |
| 46.91% | 81 | 5.5 | 870 | 12,404 | 42.3% | 49.1% | |
| 50.67% | 75 | 1.8 | 771 | 13,152 | 35.7% | 59.6% | |
| 49.33% | 75 | 3.8 | 837 | 12,396 | 41.4% | 54.4% | |
| 40.58% | 69 | 1.1 | 736 | 12,924 | 28.6% | 48.8% | |
| 36.76% | 68 | 4.8 | 598 | 10,632 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 47.76% | 67 | 4.8 | 789 | 11,857 | 58.6% | 39.5% | |
| 37.50% | 64 | 2.1 | 864 | 13,137 | 21.4% | 50.0% | |
| 57.81% | 64 | 5.0 | 1,019 | 12,899 | 53.6% | 61.1% | |
| 38.10% | 63 | 3.0 | 834 | 13,007 | 50.0% | 29.7% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 1.6 | 810 | 14,007 | 55.0% | 46.9% | |
| 46.15% | 52 | 3.0 | 785 | 11,508 | 45.2% | 47.6% | |
| 43.14% | 51 | 1.0 | 791 | 13,236 | 45.5% | 41.4% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 5.3 | 950 | 13,234 | 64.7% | 43.8% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 1.6 | 871 | 14,107 | 50.0% | 40.7% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 2.2 | 828 | 12,229 | 27.3% | 48.0% | |
| 36.96% | 46 | 1.1 | 719 | 13,104 | 46.7% | 32.3% | |
| 32.61% | 46 | 4.2 | 1,036 | 12,500 | 29.4% | 34.5% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 1.9 | 884 | 13,731 | 47.6% | 58.3% | |
| 44.44% | 45 | 5.2 | 988 | 11,164 | 30.4% | 59.1% | |
| 40.91% | 44 | 5.2 | 700 | 10,260 | 40.7% | 41.2% | |
| 43.18% | 44 | 1.5 | 688 | 11,193 | 46.1% | 38.9% | |
| 45.45% | 44 | 5.9 | 905 | 12,488 | 43.8% | 46.4% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 5.5 | 902 | 13,013 | 62.5% | 51.9% | |
| 39.53% | 43 | 2.3 | 791 | 13,232 | 30.8% | 43.3% | |
| 48.84% | 43 | 1.1 | 808 | 14,079 | 53.9% | 46.7% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 5.6 | 1,020 | 13,266 | 28.6% | 46.4% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 5.7 | 871 | 12,449 | 53.3% | 59.3% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 5.3 | 901 | 11,782 | 50.0% | 59.1% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 5.6 | 963 | 12,822 | 61.5% | 53.6% | |
| 39.02% | 41 | 1.2 | 767 | 14,065 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 65.85% | 41 | 3.0 | 833 | 12,956 | 73.3% | 61.5% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 3.3 | 891 | 14,875 | 33.3% | 73.1% | |
| 35.00% | 40 | 1.4 | 719 | 12,174 | 25.0% | 45.0% | |
| 58.97% | 39 | 3.5 | 833 | 13,430 | 64.3% | 56.0% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 5.6 | 941 | 13,399 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 5.7 | 792 | 12,812 | 60.0% | 31.8% | |
| 32.43% | 37 | 5.2 | 840 | 12,214 | 26.7% | 36.4% | |
| 59.46% | 37 | 5.8 | 819 | 11,716 | 57.1% | 60.9% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 6.3 | 918 | 11,867 | 52.6% | 76.5% | |
| 63.89% | 36 | 5.6 | 999 | 14,508 | 63.6% | 64.0% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 4.0 | 965 | 13,061 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 6.0 | 981 | 13,459 | 35.7% | 45.5% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.1 | 893 | 13,510 | 46.1% | 40.9% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 1.1 | 777 | 12,568 | 18.2% | 43.5% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 6.0 | 920 | 12,116 | 50.0% | 64.3% | |
| 62.50% | 32 | 5.5 | 752 | 11,022 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 6.0 | 1,048 | 12,820 | 23.1% | 63.2% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 0.8 | 811 | 11,554 | 35.7% | 50.0% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.3 | 642 | 13,773 | 62.5% | 39.1% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 4.7 | 977 | 12,444 | 38.5% | 70.6% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 4.1 | 793 | 11,119 | 64.3% | 46.7% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 5.6 | 909 | 13,055 | 41.7% | 68.8% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 5.1 | 815 | 10,823 | 21.4% | 71.4% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 0.9 | 713 | 11,343 | 50.0% | 35.7% | |
| 40.74% | 27 | 4.9 | 1,056 | 12,073 | 25.0% | 53.3% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 5.6 | 1,039 | 12,246 | 72.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 6.0 | 834 | 13,511 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 30.77% | 26 | 4.3 | 793 | 11,395 | 18.2% | 40.0% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 4.5 | 832 | 11,135 | 66.7% | 64.3% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.6 | 722 | 12,725 | 42.9% | 47.1% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 1.1 | 721 | 12,634 | 23.1% | 44.4% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 2.2 | 975 | 13,512 | 62.5% | 46.1% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 1,031 | 13,808 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.4 | 904 | 11,765 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 20 | 0.9 | 765 | 12,023 | 30.8% | 28.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 4.3 | 946 | 12,771 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 802 | 10,092 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 4.4 | 938 | 13,794 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 5.8 | 973 | 13,315 | 14.3% | 75.0% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 5.7 | 925 | 11,687 | 42.9% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 4.3 | 902 | 14,644 | 66.7% | 46.7% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 1.0 | 660 | 10,894 | 30.0% | 37.5% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 5.3 | 710 | 12,137 | 33.3% | 44.4% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 4.5 | 863 | 12,852 | 33.3% | 22.2% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 0.8 | 603 | 11,716 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.6 | 862 | 13,818 | 40.0% | 71.4% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.1 | 830 | 14,033 | 28.6% | 50.0% | |
| 29.41% | 17 | 1.7 | 844 | 13,678 | 50.0% | 18.2% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 4.7 | 813 | 12,067 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.9 | 874 | 11,644 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 5.2 | 719 | 13,774 | 40.0% | 36.4% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.0 | 931 | 13,342 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 86.67% | 15 | 5.3 | 954 | 14,797 | 75.0% | 90.9% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.7 | 863 | 12,612 | 28.6% | 28.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.1 | 763 | 13,623 | 60.0% | 55.6% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 4.2 | 737 | 11,569 | 62.5% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.4 | 680 | 14,269 | 50.0% | 63.6% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 6.6 | 889 | 11,692 | 33.3% | 14.3% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 2.6 | 679 | 10,274 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.7 | 939 | 12,191 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.8 | 580 | 10,133 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 2.4 | 909 | 12,922 | 40.0% | 28.6% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.3 | 801 | 11,628 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.9 | 981 | 14,180 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.3 | 715 | 10,273 | 40.0% | 80.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 3.3 | 618 | 9,786 | 16.7% | 25.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 915 | 12,380 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 807 | 13,177 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 852 | 15,388 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.8 | 871 | 11,710 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 779 | 11,628 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.0 | 624 | 10,608 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.9 | 612 | 9,139 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.6 | 952 | 12,053 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.6 | 838 | 11,974 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 792 | 11,170 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.4 | 934 | 14,657 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.3 | 822 | 12,726 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.0 | 780 | 13,258 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.5 | 826 | 12,618 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.1 | 738 | 12,064 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 5.5 | 742 | 10,641 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 823 | 11,784 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.6 | 766 | 14,010 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 569 | 6,521 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 660 | 13,487 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.4 | 716 | 12,423 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.6 | 594 | 10,595 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,029 | 11,746 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 890 | 12,649 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 779 | 9,853 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 803 | 13,142 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 594 | 8,090 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 929 | 12,135 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 1,148 | 14,967 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 784 | 12,574 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 802 | 14,927 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Quinn vs Samira - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Quinn do against Samira in League of Legends?
Samira wins the Quinn vs Samira matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to Quinn's 20.0%, a 60.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Quinn do against Samira in the early game?
In the early game, Samira has the advantage against Quinn with a 75.0% win rate versus 25.0%. Samira players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Quinn do against Samira in the late game?
In the late game, Samira takes over the Quinn vs Samira matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Samira scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Quinn vs Samira matchup?
Samira wins the matchup against Quinn with a 80.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 60.0 percentage point advantage means Samira is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Quinn build against Samira?
The best Quinn build against Samira includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Quinn runes against Samira?
The best Quinn runes against Samira use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Quinn vs Samira matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Quinn counter Samira?
No, Quinn struggles against Samira with only a 20.0% win rate. Samira has the advantage in this matchup. Quinn players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Samira's lead.
How do I play Quinn against Samira?
When playing Quinn against Samira, play cautiously and avoid Samira's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Samira has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.