Seraphinevs Zac
Seraphine vs Zac is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.12. Seraphine wins with a 85.7% win rate (+71.4%) over Zac based on 7 games. Seraphine holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Seraphine vs Zac matchup.
Seraphine Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Seraphine performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Seraphine vs Zac Matchup?
Seraphine vs Zac Matchup Summary
The Seraphine vs Zac matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Seraphine wins with a 85.7% win rate compared to Zac's 14.3%, giving Seraphine a 71.4 percentage point advantage. Seraphine dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Zac players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 1,116 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Seraphine players can confidently pick into Zac and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Zac away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Seraphine vs Zac Laning Phase Breakdown
Zac is favored during the laning phase against Seraphine, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Zac holds advantages in farming, damage, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Seraphine83.3%
Zac16.7%Seraphine100.0%Zac0.0%Seraphine dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 83.3% win rate — a 66.7 percentage point lead over Zac. This lopsided early game means Seraphine can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Seraphine is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Zac. Extended games heavily favor Seraphine, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Seraphine holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Zac players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Seraphine Runes Against Zac
Sorcery
Inspiration
Running Sorcery primary with Inspiration secondary allows Seraphine to press their advantage against Zac, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Seraphine matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.12. The table below shows Seraphine's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Seraphine build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.28% | 349 | 1.6 | 451 | 9,234 | 42.4% | 51.0% | |
| 51.76% | 284 | 2.9 | 602 | 10,262 | 51.2% | 52.2% | |
| 54.35% | 230 | 1.3 | 486 | 9,184 | 58.3% | 51.2% | |
| 49.76% | 209 | 1.4 | 492 | 8,620 | 50.0% | 49.5% | |
| 51.72% | 203 | 1.4 | 491 | 9,092 | 57.8% | 46.9% | |
| 52.02% | 198 | 1.4 | 505 | 9,047 | 56.0% | 48.0% | |
| 45.92% | 196 | 1.5 | 470 | 9,302 | 53.0% | 42.3% | |
| 51.70% | 147 | 2.0 | 507 | 10,176 | 55.8% | 49.5% | |
| 47.89% | 142 | 1.4 | 486 | 8,582 | 41.8% | 55.6% | |
| 46.32% | 136 | 1.5 | 480 | 9,475 | 49.1% | 44.2% | |
| 56.49% | 131 | 1.5 | 470 | 9,463 | 54.0% | 58.0% | |
| 50.41% | 123 | 1.4 | 391 | 8,601 | 59.0% | 41.9% | |
| 60.68% | 117 | 1.5 | 465 | 9,367 | 57.5% | 62.3% | |
| 52.17% | 115 | 1.4 | 462 | 8,577 | 48.5% | 57.1% | |
| 52.63% | 114 | 1.4 | 457 | 8,670 | 46.5% | 58.9% | |
| 48.65% | 111 | 1.5 | 489 | 8,655 | 46.4% | 50.9% | |
| 66.36% | 110 | 1.5 | 478 | 8,680 | 70.2% | 62.3% | |
| 58.82% | 102 | 1.7 | 578 | 9,610 | 52.4% | 63.3% | |
| 54.00% | 100 | 1.3 | 431 | 8,872 | 42.2% | 63.6% | |
| 55.00% | 100 | 2.2 | 513 | 9,585 | 42.2% | 65.5% | |
| 54.08% | 98 | 1.4 | 492 | 9,434 | 48.7% | 57.6% | |
| 52.38% | 84 | 1.4 | 581 | 8,920 | 54.8% | 50.0% | |
| 48.19% | 83 | 1.9 | 490 | 9,446 | 46.0% | 50.0% | |
| 56.96% | 79 | 1.5 | 512 | 9,267 | 61.8% | 53.3% | |
| 53.52% | 71 | 1.5 | 479 | 8,967 | 55.6% | 51.4% | |
| 42.86% | 70 | 1.2 | 411 | 8,694 | 43.8% | 42.1% | |
| 60.94% | 64 | 4.9 | 647 | 11,064 | 57.7% | 63.2% | |
| 36.51% | 63 | 1.5 | 509 | 8,746 | 36.7% | 36.4% | |
| 49.21% | 63 | 1.4 | 497 | 9,033 | 53.6% | 45.7% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 6.2 | 788 | 11,711 | 64.0% | 43.3% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.4 | 523 | 8,826 | 65.5% | 35.0% | |
| 53.06% | 49 | 1.4 | 467 | 9,325 | 52.6% | 53.3% | |
| 61.70% | 47 | 6.7 | 783 | 13,230 | 66.7% | 59.4% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 1.6 | 471 | 9,397 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 68.09% | 47 | 5.5 | 719 | 11,908 | 70.8% | 65.2% | |
| 60.47% | 43 | 1.4 | 520 | 9,319 | 63.6% | 57.1% | |
| 71.05% | 38 | 5.4 | 798 | 12,439 | 68.8% | 72.7% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 1.2 | 519 | 8,754 | 50.0% | 78.6% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.8 | 793 | 11,963 | 54.5% | 52.4% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.6 | 471 | 10,042 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 574 | 8,911 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 3.9 | 554 | 10,367 | 76.9% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.3 | 472 | 8,739 | 61.5% | 36.4% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 6.3 | 817 | 13,004 | 66.7% | 41.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.5 | 593 | 9,192 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 1.8 | 409 | 8,198 | 72.7% | 33.3% | |
| 69.57% | 23 | 1.8 | 514 | 9,142 | 63.6% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.4 | 975 | 15,138 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 1.4 | 519 | 8,851 | 41.7% | 77.8% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 3.2 | 538 | 9,937 | 42.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.7 | 593 | 9,224 | 41.7% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.0 | 823 | 12,581 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.8 | 820 | 12,295 | 72.7% | 14.3% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 2.2 | 598 | 9,887 | 60.0% | 37.5% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.0 | 739 | 13,049 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 6.7 | 800 | 12,244 | 30.0% | 71.4% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 6.5 | 820 | 13,111 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.0 | 786 | 12,948 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 76.47% | 17 | 2.9 | 597 | 8,641 | 62.5% | 88.9% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.9 | 703 | 11,620 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 6.5 | 735 | 11,253 | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 2.4 | 435 | 9,442 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 3.9 | 637 | 10,969 | 33.3% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.9 | 758 | 11,644 | 28.6% | 57.1% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 1.5 | 509 | 9,576 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.3 | 861 | 11,236 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.3 | 639 | 10,775 | 20.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.6 | 469 | 9,510 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 6.9 | 903 | 13,743 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.5 | 504 | 7,856 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 4.7 | 554 | 11,901 | 100.0% | 37.5% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 6.8 | 881 | 13,542 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 90.91% | 11 | 1.5 | 562 | 11,136 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 696 | 11,133 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 625 | 10,413 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 702 | 14,412 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 2.1 | 476 | 10,114 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 4.9 | 670 | 8,898 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.8 | 713 | 11,505 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.0 | 724 | 11,125 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.8 | 808 | 12,652 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.6 | 476 | 7,952 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.3 | 429 | 7,817 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.0 | 442 | 7,996 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.2 | 568 | 11,632 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.4 | 423 | 7,097 | 83.3% | 100.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.2 | 917 | 14,117 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.7 | 477 | 8,563 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.4 | 685 | 11,992 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 591 | 8,281 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.2 | 566 | 13,537 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.5 | 746 | 11,794 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 665 | 10,744 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 710 | 12,962 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 482 | 8,866 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.0 | 349 | 7,805 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 574 | 9,795 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 445 | 10,612 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Seraphine vs Zac - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Seraphine do against Zac in League of Legends?
Seraphine wins the Seraphine vs Zac matchup with a 85.7% win rate compared to Zac's 14.3%, a 71.4 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.12.
How does Seraphine do against Zac in the early game?
In the early game, Seraphine has the advantage against Zac with a 83.3% win rate versus 16.7%. Seraphine players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Seraphine do against Zac in the late game?
In the late game, Seraphine takes over the Seraphine vs Zac matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Seraphine scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Seraphine vs Zac matchup?
Seraphine wins the matchup against Zac with a 85.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.12. The 71.4 percentage point advantage means Seraphine is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Seraphine build against Zac?
The best Seraphine build against Zac includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Seraphine runes against Zac?
The best Seraphine runes against Zac use the Sorcery primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Seraphine vs Zac matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Seraphine counter Zac?
Yes, Seraphine has a favorable matchup against Zac with a 85.7% win rate. Seraphine strongly counters Zac in lane based on current patch 26.12 data.
How do I play Seraphine against Zac?
When playing Seraphine against Zac, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.