Zacvs Seraphine
Zac vs Seraphine is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.9. Seraphine wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Zac based on 5 games. Zac wins the early laning phase while Seraphine scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Zac vs Seraphine matchup.
Zac Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Zac performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Seraphine(40.0%)Who Wins the Zac vs Seraphine Matchup?
Zac vs Seraphine Matchup Summary
The Zac vs Seraphine matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Seraphine wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Zac's 40.0%, giving Seraphine a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Zac controls the early laning stage, but Seraphine outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Zac needs to press advantages before Seraphine reaches their power spikes, while Seraphine should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Zac leads by 1,152 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Seraphine has a strong advantage in this matchup. Zac players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Seraphine overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Zac vs Seraphine Laning Phase Breakdown
Seraphine is favored during the laning phase against Zac, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Seraphine holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Zac Build Against Seraphine
Ionian Boots of Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Seraphine, providing the mobility and stats Zac needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Zac against Seraphine are Thornmail, Sunfire Aegis and Spirit Visage. This combination gives Zac an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Zac vs Seraphine matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Zac50.0%Seraphine50.0%Zac33.3%Seraphine66.7%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Zac and Seraphine, with Zac holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Seraphine is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Zac. Extended games heavily favor Seraphine, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
The power dynamics shift as the game progresses — Zac has the edge early, but Seraphine gradually takes over. However, the margins are slim enough that either champion can win at any stage with the right plays. Focus on taking advantages when you have them rather than waiting for a specific game phase.
Best Zac Runes Against Seraphine
Domination
Sorcery
The Domination and Sorcery rune setup gives Zac the best tools to compete against Seraphine in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Zac matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.9. The table below shows Zac's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Zac build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.2 | 573 | 11,915 | 42.9% | 54.0% | |
| 45.16% | 62 | 1.0 | 565 | 11,532 | 51.9% | 40.0% | |
| 49.12% | 57 | 1.0 | 597 | 12,081 | 68.2% | 37.1% | |
| 55.10% | 49 | 1.2 | 612 | 12,191 | 60.9% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 0.9 | 600 | 12,697 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 1.1 | 621 | 12,057 | 62.5% | 56.0% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 1.0 | 562 | 10,891 | 42.1% | 68.2% | |
| 35.90% | 39 | 0.9 | 552 | 10,473 | 31.3% | 39.1% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 1.1 | 672 | 11,240 | 38.1% | 50.0% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 1.3 | 591 | 11,573 | 43.8% | 42.9% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 1.1 | 630 | 11,678 | 55.6% | 52.6% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.3 | 630 | 12,282 | 57.9% | 57.1% | |
| 65.63% | 32 | 1.1 | 590 | 11,795 | 57.1% | 72.2% | |
| 41.94% | 31 | 1.0 | 610 | 12,454 | 58.3% | 31.6% | |
| 54.84% | 31 | 1.4 | 597 | 11,734 | 58.8% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 30 | 1.1 | 622 | 11,881 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 1.2 | 626 | 12,877 | 60.0% | 57.9% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.0 | 595 | 11,550 | 56.3% | 54.5% | |
| 68.00% | 25 | 1.0 | 646 | 13,070 | 75.0% | 64.7% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 1.1 | 662 | 11,635 | 69.2% | 63.6% | |
| 33.33% | 24 | 1.0 | 579 | 11,529 | 18.2% | 46.1% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 1.1 | 662 | 13,286 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 1.1 | 633 | 10,554 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 1.9 | 578 | 12,125 | 66.7% | 61.5% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 1.1 | 522 | 10,873 | 30.8% | 88.9% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.2 | 590 | 11,367 | 54.5% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 3.5 | 893 | 10,903 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.6 | 632 | 11,071 | 81.8% | 33.3% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.3 | 521 | 10,227 | 45.5% | 44.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.2 | 624 | 11,644 | 54.5% | 37.5% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 0.9 | 624 | 11,811 | 77.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 1.3 | 673 | 12,529 | 71.4% | 45.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 0.9 | 606 | 11,371 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.8 | 810 | 12,949 | 71.4% | 44.4% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.9 | 572 | 10,459 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.5 | 612 | 10,962 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.9 | 684 | 12,227 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 2.5 | 536 | 9,290 | 22.2% | 40.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 1.2 | 786 | 14,887 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.0 | 460 | 11,092 | 40.0% | 75.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 3.3 | 608 | 11,631 | 85.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 606 | 11,702 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 4.6 | 661 | 11,025 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.4 | 702 | 14,586 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 3.1 | 644 | 11,639 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.4 | 601 | 10,971 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.4 | 544 | 11,254 | 33.3% | 57.1% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.1 | 561 | 10,463 | 40.0% | 100.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 5.3 | 824 | 12,650 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.6 | 647 | 12,864 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.2 | 708 | 11,962 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.7 | 552 | 10,473 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 100.00% | 9 | 2.2 | 660 | 12,722 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.8 | 612 | 8,651 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 548 | 10,544 | 25.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.7 | 472 | 11,391 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 688 | 12,414 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.9 | 648 | 10,879 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.1 | 767 | 11,898 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.9 | 601 | 11,438 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.9 | 378 | 6,702 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.1 | 486 | 8,091 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.2 | 785 | 11,973 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.3 | 666 | 12,257 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.9 | 615 | 11,744 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.6 | 576 | 9,661 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.8 | 679 | 11,032 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.7 | 436 | 9,959 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.4 | 800 | 11,050 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.2 | 603 | 11,679 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.0 | 581 | 13,065 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.0 | 551 | 10,785 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 809 | 14,585 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.5 | 444 | 9,629 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.7 | 754 | 10,792 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 685 | 11,470 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 437 | 9,089 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 519 | 7,811 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 650 | 11,276 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 601 | 7,484 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zac vs Seraphine - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Zac do against Seraphine in League of Legends?
Seraphine wins the Zac vs Seraphine matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Zac's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.9.
How does Zac do against Seraphine in the early game?
In the early game, Zac has the advantage against Seraphine with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Zac players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Zac do against Seraphine in the late game?
In the late game, Seraphine takes over the Zac vs Seraphine matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Seraphine scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Zac vs Seraphine matchup?
Seraphine wins the matchup against Zac with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.9. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Seraphine is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Zac build against Seraphine?
The best Zac build against Seraphine includes Thornmail, Sunfire Aegis, Spirit Visage with Ionian Boots of Lucidity. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Zac runes against Seraphine?
The best Zac runes against Seraphine use the Domination primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Zac vs Seraphine matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Zac counter Seraphine?
No, Zac struggles against Seraphine with only a 40.0% win rate. Seraphine has the advantage in this matchup. Zac players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Seraphine's lead.
How do I play Zac against Seraphine?
When playing Zac against Seraphine, play cautiously and avoid Seraphine's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Seraphine has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.