Cypher vs Raze•Matchup

Cypher vs Raze Matchup Summary

The Cypher vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a significant advantage for one side. Based on 35 competitive matches analyzed, Cypher wins 54.3% of the time compared to Raze's 45.7%, a 8.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Cypher consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Cypher dominates this matchup statistically. Cypher can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Raze should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.

Cypher vs Raze Fragging Analysis

Cypher edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 35 matches analyzed, this Cypher vs Raze matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.

Cypher vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side

Raze

44.7%

46.2%

Defense Side

Raze

53.8%

55.3%

Attack Side Breakdown

Raze demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Cypher in this matchup, converting 46.2% of attacking rounds versus 44.7%. While this 1.5 point edge gives Raze slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Cypher players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 35 competitive games suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Cypher teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.5% gap.

When taking entry duels, Raze holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Cypher players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Raze's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Cypher should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.5 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Raze shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Cypher, winning 55.3% of defense rounds compared to 53.8%. This 1.5 percentage point edge suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Cypher players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Raze can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.5% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Cypher should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Raze demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Raze converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Cypher should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Raze when you can wait for teammates. Raze can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.5% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Cypher should be more conservative with eco aggression against Raze and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.2% attack win rate and 55.3% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Cypher remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Cypher vs Raze specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Cypher and Raze are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Cypher is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Cypher, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics

The Sentinel (Cypher) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Cypher's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Cypher's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.