Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Cypher's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Cypher
52.9% WR
VS
Omen
45.1% WR
Who Wins the Cypher vs Omen Matchup?
Winner
Cypher
Matches: 51
52.9%
Win Rate
45.1%
1.29
Avg KDA
1.61
14.3
Avg Kills
14.7
14.3
Avg Deaths
14.8
128.1
DMG/Round
130.1
31.2%
HS %
30.9%
191
Combat Score
200
47.7%
Attack WR
44.6%
55.4%
Defense WR
52.3%
Cypher vs Omen Performance Breakdown
The Cypher vs Omen matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 51 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.29Cypher
1.61Omen
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.61 KDA versus Cypher's 1.29. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
128.1Cypher
130.1Omen
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Cypher averaging 128.1 ADR and Omen at 130.1 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
47.7%Cypher
44.6%Omen
Cypher shows stronger attack-side performance with a 47.7% win rate versus Omen's 44.6%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Cypher provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
55.4%Cypher
52.3%Omen
Defensive capabilities favor Cypher at 55.4% win rate compared to Omen's 52.3%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Cypher provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Cypher vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 51 competitive matches analyzed, Cypher wins 52.9% of the time compared to Omen's 45.1%, a 7.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Controller matchup, Cypher dominates this matchup statistically. Cypher can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Omen should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Cypher vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Omen edges out Cypher in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 51 matches analyzed, this Cypher vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Cypher shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Cypher's favor.
Avg KDA
1.29Cypher
1.61Omen
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Cypher, maintaining a 1.61 KDA versus 1.29. This 0.32 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Cypher players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
14.3Cypher
14.7Omen
Kill production between Cypher and Omen is virtually identical, with Cypher averaging 14.3 kills per game and Omen securing 14.7. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
14.3Cypher
14.8Omen
Cypher survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.3 times per game compared to Omen's 14.8 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Cypher is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Omen players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Cypher's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
128.1Cypher
130.1Omen
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Cypher (128.1 ADR) and Omen (130.1 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
31.2%Cypher
30.9%Omen
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Cypher (31.2%) and Omen (30.9%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Cypher vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Cypher
47.7%
44.6%
Defense Side
Cypher
55.4%
52.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Cypher holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Cypher vs Omen matchup, winning 47.7% of offensive rounds compared to 44.6% for Omen. This 3.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 51 matches reveals Cypher's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Cypher consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Omen teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Cypher's favor in this matchup. When Cypher takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Omen. For Omen players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Cypher's advantages. Cypher can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Cypher has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Cypher's strongest matchup is against Waylay with a 66.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Miks at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Cypher matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cypher's best matchup is against Waylay, achieving a 66.1% win rate. Cypher excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Cypher's hardest matchup?
Cypher's hardest matchup is against Miks, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Cypher should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Cypher have?
Cypher has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Cypher in difficult matchups?
When playing Cypher in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Cypher's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Cypher's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Cypher's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Cypher's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.1% attack-side gap suggests Cypher excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Omen should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Cypher's kit advantages become decisive. For Cypher, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Cypher demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Omen, holding 55.4% of rounds versus 52.3%. This 3.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Cypher's defensive advantage. Cypher can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Omen should avoid solo anchor positions against Cypher — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Omen's site with Cypher on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Cypher in this matchup. Our 51 match analysis shows Cypher converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Omen should never attempt solo retakes against Cypher — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Cypher can confidently take 1vX retakes that Omen should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Cypher's defensive advantages. Omen should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Cypher, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Cypher can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Omen should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Cypher holds clear advantages on both attack (47.7%) and defense (55.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Cypher vs Omen matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Cypher doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Cypher's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Cypher performs better. Omen teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Omen with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Omen's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Cypher is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Cypher provides a measurable ranked advantage. Omen players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Cypher confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Cypher wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.3 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Omen isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Controller Dynamics
The Sentinel (Cypher) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Cypher's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Cypher's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Cypher advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Cypher vs Omen head-to-head analysis. Cypher holds a 52.9% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 51 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
