Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Cypher's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Cypher
51.3% WR
VS
Chamber
46.7% WR
Who Wins the Cypher vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Cypher
Matches: 152
51.3%
Win Rate
46.7%
1.31
Avg KDA
1.26
15.6
Avg Kills
16.5
14.9
Avg Deaths
15.2
134.3
DMG/Round
140.7
31.4%
HS %
29.3%
203
Combat Score
215
49.8%
Attack WR
48.8%
51.2%
Defense WR
50.2%
Cypher vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 152 matches reveals that Cypher holds a clear advantage over Chamber in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Chamber shows strength in one category, Cypher's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.31Cypher
1.26Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Cypher and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.31 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
134.3Cypher
140.7Chamber
Chamber outputs 140.7 average damage per round, edging out Cypher's 134.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Chamber secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.8%Cypher
48.8%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Cypher at 49.8% and Chamber at 48.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
51.2%Cypher
50.2%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Cypher posting a 51.2% win rate and Chamber at 50.2%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Cypher vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 152 competitive matches analyzed, Cypher wins 51.3% of the time compared to Chamber's 46.7%, a 4.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Cypher consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Cypher has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Chamber players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Cypher vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Cypher edges out Chamber in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 152 matches analyzed, this Cypher vs Chamber matchup remains contestable for both sides. Chamber shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Chamber's favor.
Avg KDA
1.31Cypher
1.26Chamber
The KDA comparison between Cypher and Chamber reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Cypher averaging 1.31 and Chamber posting 1.26. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
15.6Cypher
16.5Chamber
Chamber secures approximately 0.9 more kills per match than Cypher in this head-to-head (16.5 vs 15.6). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Chamber contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Chamber's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Cypher can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.9Cypher
15.2Chamber
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Cypher (14.9 deaths/game) and Chamber (15.2 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
134.3Cypher
140.7Chamber
Chamber applies 6.4 more damage per round than Cypher in this matchup (140.7 vs 134.3 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Chamber contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Cypher can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
31.4%Cypher
29.3%Chamber
Cypher demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Chamber: 31.4% versus 29.3%. This 2.1 percentage point gap in precision means Cypher ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Chamber faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Cypher vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Cypher
49.8%
48.8%
Defense Side
Cypher
51.2%
50.2%
Attack Side Breakdown
Cypher demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Chamber in this matchup, converting 49.8% of attacking rounds versus 48.8%. While this 1.0 point edge gives Cypher slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 152 competitive games suggests Cypher's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Chamber teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.0% gap.
When taking entry duels, Cypher holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Chamber players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Cypher can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Cypher has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Cypher's strongest matchup is against Waylay with a 66.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Miks at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Cypher matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Cypher's best matchup is against Waylay, achieving a 66.1% win rate. Cypher excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Cypher's hardest matchup?
Cypher's hardest matchup is against Miks, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Cypher should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Cypher have?
Cypher has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Cypher in difficult matchups?
When playing Cypher in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Cypher's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Cypher's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Cypher's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Cypher's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Chamber should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.0 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Cypher shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Chamber, winning 51.2% of defense rounds compared to 50.2%. This 1.0 percentage point edge suggests Cypher's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Chamber players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Cypher can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.0% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Chamber should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Cypher demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Cypher converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Chamber should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Cypher when you can wait for teammates. Cypher can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.0% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Chamber should be more conservative with eco aggression against Cypher and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Cypher can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Cypher maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.8% attack win rate and 51.2% defense win rate. While Cypher is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Chamber remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Cypher vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Cypher advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Cypher and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Cypher has a slight statistical edge, but Chamber is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Chamber, don't switch to Cypher just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Cypher and Chamber fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Cypher is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Cypher's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Cypher vs Chamber head-to-head analysis. Cypher holds a 51.3% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 152 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
