Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Deadlock's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Deadlock
57.1% WR
VS
Phoenix
42.9% WR
Who Wins the Deadlock vs Phoenix Matchup?
Winner
Deadlock
Matches: 7
57.1%
Win Rate
42.9%
1.29
Avg KDA
1.36
15.0
Avg Kills
17.3
15.1
Avg Deaths
16.4
127.3
DMG/Round
156.4
25.8%
HS %
33.7%
197
Combat Score
229
45.7%
Attack WR
47.9%
52.1%
Defense WR
54.3%
Deadlock vs Phoenix Performance Breakdown
In the Deadlock vs Phoenix matchup, Phoenix demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 7 analyzed matches, Phoenix outperforms Deadlock in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Phoenix the statistically favored pick when facing Deadlock in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.29Deadlock
1.36Phoenix
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Deadlock and Phoenix, with KDA ratios of 1.29 and 1.36 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
127.3Deadlock
156.4Phoenix
Phoenix delivers substantially higher damage per round (156.4 ADR) compared to Deadlock's 127.3 ADR. This 29.0 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Phoenix a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
45.7%Deadlock
47.9%Phoenix
Phoenix shows stronger attack-side performance with a 47.9% win rate versus Deadlock's 45.7%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Phoenix provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
52.1%Deadlock
54.3%Phoenix
Defensive capabilities favor Phoenix at 54.3% win rate compared to Deadlock's 52.1%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Phoenix provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Deadlock vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 7 competitive matches analyzed, Deadlock wins 57.1% of the time compared to Phoenix's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Deadlock has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Deadlock and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Deadlock vs Phoenix Fragging Analysis
Phoenix claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Deadlock vs Phoenix matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 7 ranked games reveals Phoenix consistently outperforms Deadlock in direct combat scenarios. While Deadlock manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Phoenix in gunfights. Deadlock players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Phoenix dominates.
Avg KDA
1.29Deadlock
1.36Phoenix
The KDA comparison between Deadlock and Phoenix reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Deadlock averaging 1.29 and Phoenix posting 1.36. This razor-thin margin of just 0.06 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
15.0Deadlock
17.3Phoenix
Phoenix substantially outfrags Deadlock in this matchup, averaging 17.3 kills compared to 15.0 — a difference of nearly 2.3 eliminations per match. When Phoenix faces Deadlock, the data clearly shows Phoenix finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Deadlock players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Phoenix in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
15.1Deadlock
16.4Phoenix
Deadlock demonstrates markedly better survivability against Phoenix, recording 15.1 deaths per game versus 16.4. Dying nearly 1.3 fewer times per match gives Deadlock significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Phoenix players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
127.3Deadlock
156.4Phoenix
The damage differential between Phoenix and Deadlock is exceptional: 156.4 ADR compared to just 127.3. Phoenix deals 29.0 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Phoenix's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Deadlock struggles to even trade effectively. Deadlock players should treat Phoenix as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
25.8%Deadlock
33.7%Phoenix
The headshot percentage disparity between Phoenix and Deadlock is substantial: 33.7% compared to 25.8%, a 7.9 point difference. Phoenix consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Deadlock, challenging Phoenix in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Phoenix's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Deadlock vs Phoenix Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Phoenix
45.7%
47.9%
Defense Side
Phoenix
52.1%
54.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
Phoenix demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Deadlock in this matchup, converting 47.9% of attacking rounds versus 45.7%. While this 2.3 point edge gives Phoenix slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Deadlock players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 7 competitive games suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Deadlock teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.3% gap.
When taking entry duels, Phoenix holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Deadlock players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Deadlock has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Deadlock's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 72.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Deadlock matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Deadlock's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 72.7% win rate. Deadlock excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Deadlock's hardest matchup?
Deadlock's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Deadlock should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Deadlock have?
Deadlock has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Deadlock in difficult matchups?
When playing Deadlock in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Deadlock's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Deadlock's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Deadlock's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Phoenix's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Deadlock should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.3 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Phoenix shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Deadlock, winning 54.3% of defense rounds compared to 52.1%. This 2.3 percentage point edge suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Deadlock players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Phoenix can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.3% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Deadlock should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Phoenix demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Phoenix converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Deadlock should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Phoenix when you can wait for teammates. Phoenix can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.3% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Deadlock should be more conservative with eco aggression against Phoenix and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Phoenix holds clear advantages on both attack (47.9%) and defense (54.3%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Deadlock vs Phoenix matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Phoenix doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Phoenix's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Phoenix performs better. Deadlock teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Deadlock with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Deadlock's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Phoenix is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Phoenix provides a measurable ranked advantage. Deadlock players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Phoenix confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Phoenix wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.5 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Deadlock isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Deadlock) vs Duelist (Phoenix) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Deadlock's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Phoenix's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Deadlock's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Phoenix's Duelist kit counters others. The Phoenix advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.9%
53.7%
48.5%
56.3%
49.1%
53.5%
52.4%
53.3%
54.1%
45.3%
56.9%
53.5%
44.4%
55.4%
52.1%
56.7%
40.4%
59.5%
51.9%
54.2%
54.5%
Deadlock vs Phoenix matchup breakdown: Deadlock dominates with a 57.1% win rate across 7 matches. Higher damage output (127 ADR) gives Deadlock a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
