Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Jett's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Jett
47.9% WR
VS
Chamber
51.2% WR
Who Wins the Jett vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 939
47.9%
Win Rate
51.2%
1.24
Avg KDA
1.28
17.2
Avg Kills
16.8
16.3
Avg Deaths
15.2
148.6
DMG/Round
142.5
30.2%
HS %
29.8%
227
Combat Score
217
47.4%
Attack WR
47.6%
52.4%
Defense WR
52.6%
Jett vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 939 matches reveals that Chamber holds a clear advantage over Jett in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Jett shows strength in one category, Chamber's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.24Jett
1.28Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Jett and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.24 and 1.28 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
148.6Jett
142.5Chamber
Jett outputs 148.6 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 142.5 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Jett secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.4%Jett
47.6%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Jett at 47.4% and Chamber at 47.6% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.4%Jett
52.6%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Jett posting a 52.4% win rate and Chamber at 52.6%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Jett vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 939 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 51.2% of the time compared to Jett's 47.9%, a 3.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Jett consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Chamber has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Jett players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Jett vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Jett edges out Chamber in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 939 matches analyzed, this Jett vs Chamber matchup remains contestable for both sides. Chamber shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Chamber's favor.
Avg KDA
1.24Jett
1.28Chamber
The KDA comparison between Jett and Chamber reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Jett averaging 1.24 and Chamber posting 1.28. This razor-thin margin of just 0.04 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.2Jett
16.8Chamber
Kill production between Jett and Chamber is virtually identical, with Jett averaging 17.2 kills per game and Chamber securing 16.8. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.3Jett
15.2Chamber
Chamber demonstrates markedly better survivability against Jett, recording 15.2 deaths per game versus 16.3. Dying nearly 1.2 fewer times per match gives Chamber significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Jett players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
148.6Jett
142.5Chamber
Jett applies 6.0 more damage per round than Chamber in this matchup (148.6 vs 142.5 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Jett contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Chamber can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.2%Jett
29.8%Chamber
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Jett (30.2%) and Chamber (29.8%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Jett vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Chamber
47.4%
47.6%
Defense Side
Chamber
52.4%
52.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Jett and Chamber reveals near-perfect parity, with Jett winning 47.4% of attacking rounds compared to Chamber's 47.6%. This negligible 0.3 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Jett nor Chamber should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 939 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Jett and Chamber players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Jett or Chamber, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Jett has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Jett's strongest matchup is against Gekko with a 72.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Deadlock at 37.8% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Jett matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Jett's best matchup is against Gekko, achieving a 72.7% win rate. Jett excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Jett's hardest matchup?
Jett's hardest matchup is against Deadlock, with only a 37.8% win rate. Against this opponent, Jett should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Jett have?
Jett has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Jett in difficult matchups?
When playing Jett in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Jett's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Jett's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Jett's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.3% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Jett and Chamber is virtually identical, with Jett holding 52.4% of rounds on CT side and Chamber at 52.6%. This 0.3 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Jett and Chamber can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.3% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Jett and Chamber. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 939 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Jett or Chamber.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Jett vs Chamber specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Chamber maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.6% attack win rate and 52.6% defense win rate. While Chamber is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Jett remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Jett vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Chamber advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Jett and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Chamber has a slight statistical edge, but Jett is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Jett, don't switch to Chamber just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Jett) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Jett's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Jett's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Chamber advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Jett vs Chamber is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.9% vs 51.2%). Based on 939 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
