Chamber vs Jett matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
49.5%
Matches
378
Avg KDA
1.24
Avg ADR
140

Chamber vs JettMatchup

Sentinel
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Chamber vs Jett is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (49.5% vs 50.5%). Based on 378 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.

Chamber Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Jett - 49.5% win rateJett(49.5%)
Chamber - 49.5% win rate in this matchup
Chamber
49.5% WR
VS
Jett vs Chamber matchup - 50.5% win rate
Jett
50.5% WR

Who Wins the Chamber vs Jett Matchup?

Jett wins the Chamber vs Jett matchup
Winner
Jett
Matches: 378
49.5%
Win Rate
50.5%
1.24
Avg KDA
1.26
16.4
Avg Kills
17.4
15.4
Avg Deaths
16.2
140.1
DMG/Round
150.1
29.6%
HS %
30.7%
214
Combat Score
231
48.1%
Attack WR
49.5%
50.5%
Defense WR
51.9%

Chamber vs Jett Performance Breakdown

Chamber vs Jett matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Chamber vs Jett matchup, Jett demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 378 analyzed matches, Jett outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Jett the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.24Chamber
1.26Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Chamber and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.24 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
140.1Chamber
150.1Jett
Jett outputs 150.1 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 140.1 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Jett secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
48.1%Chamber
49.5%Jett
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Chamber at 48.1% and Jett at 49.5% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.5%Chamber
51.9%Jett
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Chamber posting a 50.5% win rate and Jett at 51.9%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.

Chamber vs Jett Matchup Summary

The Chamber vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 378 competitive matches analyzed, Jett wins 50.5% of the time compared to Chamber's 49.5%, a 1.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Jett consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Jett holds a minor advantage, but Chamber can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.

Chamber vs Jett Fragging Analysis

Jett wins fragging stats against Chamber in Valorant

Jett claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Chamber vs Jett matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 378 ranked games reveals Jett consistently outperforms Chamber in direct combat scenarios. While Chamber manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Jett in gunfights. Chamber players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Jett dominates.

KDA
1.24Chamber
1.26Jett
The KDA comparison between Chamber and Jett reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Chamber averaging 1.24 and Jett posting 1.26. This razor-thin margin of just 0.02 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.4Chamber
17.4Jett
Jett secures approximately 1.0 more kills per match than Chamber in this head-to-head (17.4 vs 16.4). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Jett contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Jett's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Chamber can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.4Chamber
16.2Jett
Chamber survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.4 times per game compared to Jett's 16.2 deaths. This 0.8 death difference per match means Chamber is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Jett players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Chamber's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
140.1Chamber
150.1Jett
Jett significantly outdamages Chamber in head-to-head encounters, posting 150.1 ADR versus 140.1. This 10.0 damage-per-round advantage means Jett consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Chamber players should avoid prolonged dueling with Jett — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
Headshot %
29.6%Chamber
30.7%Jett
Jett lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (30.7% vs 29.6%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.1 percentage point edge translates to Jett more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Chamber can fully react. Chamber players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Jett's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.

Chamber vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Jett
Chamber48.1%
Jett49.5%
Defense Side
Jett
Chamber50.5%
Jett51.9%

Attack Side Breakdown

Jett demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Chamber in this matchup, converting 49.5% of attacking rounds versus 48.1%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Jett slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 378 competitive games suggests Jett's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Chamber teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.

When taking entry duels, Jett holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Chamber players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Jett can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Jett's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Chamber should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Jett shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Chamber, winning 51.9% of defense rounds compared to 50.5%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Jett's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Chamber players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Jett can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Chamber should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Jett demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Jett converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Chamber should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Jett when you can wait for teammates. Jett can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Chamber should be more conservative with eco aggression against Jett and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Jett can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Jett maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.5% attack win rate and 51.9% defense win rate. While Jett is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Chamber remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Chamber vs Jett specific factors. The slight Jett advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Chamber and Jett are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Jett has a slight statistical edge, but Chamber is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Chamber, don't switch to Jett just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics

The Sentinel (Chamber) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Chamber's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Chamber's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Jett advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Chamber has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
49.26%4751.29141.428.9%47.8%51.2%
49.47%3781.24140.129.6%48.1%50.5%
50.54%2771.28141.930.4%50.5%50.2%
50.20%2471.28143.230.1%49.7%50.6%
53.40%2061.27139.929.1%47.0%54.8%
53.40%1911.31140.528.3%47.9%52.4%
52.22%1801.34144.829.9%49.5%51.9%
45.45%1431.25139.228.1%46.2%50.0%
51.28%1171.21135.929.4%47.5%52.7%
43.02%861.15133.326.9%42.7%53.2%
60.00%701.24136.030.2%50.3%51.2%
61.19%671.41147.128.8%51.4%56.8%
43.33%601.16131.828.7%46.7%50.0%
41.51%531.37154.226.4%47.8%48.5%
50.00%481.41148.831.5%52.3%51.0%
51.22%411.23132.629.6%47.7%56.3%
50.00%381.39150.924.9%49.9%51.9%
62.86%351.27139.033.6%51.7%53.9%
44.12%341.33148.624.3%44.3%51.0%
51.61%311.21140.229.1%48.5%50.7%
38.10%211.20129.327.3%51.8%44.1%
42.11%191.39146.427.2%56.7%44.7%
60.00%151.38139.627.9%58.5%48.8%
78.57%141.55143.529.1%63.6%57.0%
33.33%61.24149.727.5%37.3%47.0%
100.00%41.38132.720.3%59.3%60.5%
100.00%31.65156.718.2%54.5%65.6%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chamber's best matchup in Valorant?

Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Chamber's hardest matchup?

Chamber's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?

Chamber has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?

When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels