Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Neon
50.8% WR
VS
Jett
47.4% WR
Who Wins the Neon vs Jett Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 392
50.8%
Win Rate
47.4%
1.28
Avg KDA
1.25
16.8
Avg Kills
17.0
16.4
Avg Deaths
16.1
143.4
DMG/Round
149.4
21.6%
HS %
29.9%
228
Combat Score
228
49.1%
Attack WR
46.8%
53.2%
Defense WR
50.9%
Neon vs Jett Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 392 matches reveals that Neon holds a clear advantage over Jett in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Jett shows strength in one category, Neon's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.28Neon
1.25Jett
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Neon and Jett, with KDA ratios of 1.28 and 1.25 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
143.4Neon
149.4Jett
Jett outputs 149.4 average damage per round, edging out Neon's 143.4 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Jett secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.1%Neon
46.8%Jett
Neon shows stronger attack-side performance with a 49.1% win rate versus Jett's 46.8%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Neon provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
53.2%Neon
50.9%Jett
Defensive capabilities favor Neon at 53.2% win rate compared to Jett's 50.9%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Neon provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Neon vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 392 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 50.8% of the time compared to Jett's 47.4%, a 3.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Jett consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Jett players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Neon vs Jett Fragging Analysis
Jett claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Neon vs Jett matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 392 ranked games reveals Jett consistently outperforms Neon in direct combat scenarios. While Neon manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Jett in gunfights. Neon players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Jett dominates.
Avg KDA
1.28Neon
1.25Jett
The KDA comparison between Neon and Jett reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Neon averaging 1.28 and Jett posting 1.25. This razor-thin margin of just 0.03 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.8Neon
17.0Jett
Kill production between Neon and Jett is virtually identical, with Neon averaging 16.8 kills per game and Jett securing 17.0. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.4Neon
16.1Jett
Jett survives longer in this matchup, dying 16.1 times per game compared to Neon's 16.4 deaths. This 0.3 death difference per match means Jett is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Neon players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Jett's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
143.4Neon
149.4Jett
Jett applies 6.0 more damage per round than Neon in this matchup (149.4 vs 143.4 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Jett contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Neon can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
21.6%Neon
29.9%Jett
The headshot percentage disparity between Jett and Neon is substantial: 29.9% compared to 21.6%, a 8.3 point difference. Jett consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Jett in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Jett's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Neon vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
49.1%
46.8%
Defense Side
Neon
53.2%
50.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
Neon demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Jett in this matchup, converting 49.1% of attacking rounds versus 46.8%. While this 2.4 point edge gives Neon slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Jett players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 392 competitive games suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Jett teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Neon holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Jett players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Neon has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 85.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 28.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Neon matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 85.7% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Neon's hardest matchup?
Neon's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 28.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Neon have?
Neon has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Neon in difficult matchups?
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Neon's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Neon's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Jett should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Neon shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Jett, winning 53.2% of defense rounds compared to 50.9%. This 2.4 percentage point edge suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Jett players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Neon can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Jett should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Neon demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Neon converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Jett should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Neon when you can wait for teammates. Neon can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Jett should be more conservative with eco aggression against Neon and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon holds clear advantages on both attack (49.1%) and defense (53.2%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Neon vs Jett matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Neon doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Neon's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Neon performs better. Jett teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Jett with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Jett's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Neon is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Neon provides a measurable ranked advantage. Jett players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Neon confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Neon wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.7 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Jett isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Neon and Jett fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Neon is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Neon's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Neon vs Jett head-to-head analysis. Neon holds a 50.8% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 392 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
