Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Neon
54.9% WR
VS
Viper
43.9% WR
Who Wins the Neon vs Viper Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 82
54.9%
Win Rate
43.9%
1.22
Avg KDA
1.31
16.1
Avg Kills
14.8
16.6
Avg Deaths
15.2
141.0
DMG/Round
138.7
22.3%
HS %
30.8%
221
Combat Score
205
52.5%
Attack WR
49.2%
50.8%
Defense WR
47.5%
Neon vs Viper Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 82 matches reveals that Neon holds a clear advantage over Viper in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Viper shows strength in one category, Neon's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.22Neon
1.31Viper
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Neon and Viper, with KDA ratios of 1.22 and 1.31 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
141.0Neon
138.7Viper
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Neon averaging 141.0 ADR and Viper at 138.7 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
52.5%Neon
49.2%Viper
Neon shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.5% win rate versus Viper's 49.2%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Neon provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
50.8%Neon
47.5%Viper
Defensive capabilities favor Neon at 50.8% win rate compared to Viper's 47.5%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Neon provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Neon vs Viper matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 82 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 54.9% of the time compared to Viper's 43.9%, a 11.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Viper consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Neon has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Viper should never take isolated fights against Neon and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Neon vs Viper Fragging Analysis
Viper edges out Neon in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 82 matches analyzed, this Neon vs Viper matchup remains contestable for both sides. Neon shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Neon's favor.
Avg KDA
1.22Neon
1.31Viper
The KDA comparison between Neon and Viper reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Neon averaging 1.22 and Viper posting 1.31. This razor-thin margin of just 0.09 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.1Neon
14.8Viper
Neon secures approximately 1.3 more kills per match than Viper in this head-to-head (16.1 vs 14.8). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Neon contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Neon's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Viper can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
16.6Neon
15.2Viper
Viper demonstrates markedly better survivability against Neon, recording 15.2 deaths per game versus 16.6. Dying nearly 1.4 fewer times per match gives Viper significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Neon players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
141.0Neon
138.7Viper
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Neon (141.0 ADR) and Viper (138.7 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
22.3%Neon
30.8%Viper
The headshot percentage disparity between Viper and Neon is substantial: 30.8% compared to 22.3%, a 8.5 point difference. Viper consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Viper in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Viper's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Neon vs Viper Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
52.5%
49.2%
Defense Side
Neon
50.8%
47.5%
Attack Side Breakdown
Neon holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Neon vs Viper matchup, winning 52.5% of offensive rounds compared to 49.2% for Viper. This 3.3 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 82 matches reveals Neon's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Neon consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Viper teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Neon's favor in this matchup. When Neon takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Viper. For Viper players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Neon's advantages. Neon can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Neon has favorable matchups against 15 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 85.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 28.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Neon matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 85.7% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Neon's hardest matchup?
Neon's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 28.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Neon have?
Neon has 15 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Neon in difficult matchups?
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Neon's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Neon's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.3% attack-side gap suggests Neon excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Viper should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Neon's kit advantages become decisive. For Neon, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Neon demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Viper, holding 50.8% of rounds versus 47.5%. This 3.3 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Neon's defensive advantage. Neon can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Viper should avoid solo anchor positions against Neon — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Viper's site with Neon on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Neon in this matchup. Our 82 match analysis shows Neon converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Viper should never attempt solo retakes against Neon — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Neon can confidently take 1vX retakes that Viper should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Neon's defensive advantages. Viper should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Neon, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Neon can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Viper should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon holds clear advantages on both attack (52.5%) and defense (50.8%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Neon vs Viper matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Neon doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Neon's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Neon performs better. Viper teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Viper with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Viper's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Neon is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Neon provides a measurable ranked advantage. Viper players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Neon confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Neon wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.6 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Viper isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Neon) vs Controller (Viper) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Neon's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Viper's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Neon's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Viper's Controller kit counters others. The Neon advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
53.2%
52.3%
52.4%
53.1%
50.3%
51.1%
50.7%
51.9%
50.7%
52.3%
50.8%
52.2%
54.0%
52.9%
52.3%
52.2%
47.0%
50.9%
55.2%
51.4%
55.4%
41.1%
60.7%
53.8%
56.2%
41.7%
Neon vs Viper head-to-head analysis. Neon holds a 54.9% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 82 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
